2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI will say one good thing about the Clinton lies on Bernie's healthcare plans
Her complete and deliberate distortions have caused Bernie to explain what his proposal is much more directly and clearly than he has previously. I have the nooze channel on in the background, and Bernie countered with a more succinct, but clear explanation that his goal is single payer expansion of Medicare for everybody.
So perhaps the condescending meme that has been said to dismiss him as a serious candidate ("Having Sanders as a challenger will make Hillary a better nominee when she wins the primary" also applies in reverse.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)taxes raise??
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/01/clinton-campaign-keeps-attacking-bernie-health-care
Sanders' proposal, say Clinton staffers, would raise taxes on the middle class.
By Patrick Caldwell
| Wed Jan. 13, 2016 4:23 PM EST
.............Clinton campaign officials alleged that Sanders is not releasing the details of how he'd pay for the plan because he wants to hide tax increases that would hit the middle class. Earlier on Wednesday, Sanders' campaign had released a comprehensive list of proposals to pay for his various campaign schemesexcept for health care. As recently as 2013, Sanders had regularly introduced bills for single-payer health plans that include details on the tax increases that he would include to pay for the system, including an across-the-board 2.2 percent income tax hike. Since launching his presidential campaign, he's continually promised to introduce a new Medicare-for-all proposal, but has yet to come out with the details.
Speaking on behalf of the Clinton campaign, senior policy advisor Jake Sullivan and national press secretary Brian Fallon ripped into Sanders for the delay, claiming that it did a disservice to Democratic voters, with the Iowa caucuses just three weeks away. "It's not becoming, and it's not worthy of the caucus-goers in Iowa," Fallon said.
The pair of Clinton aides weren't subtle in suggesting that the reason Sanders has yet to unveil a proposal is because he doesn't want to talk about the tax increases needed to fund it. "One can only draw the conclusion that the Sanders campaign does not want to outline what is going to amount to a massive across-the-board tax hike on working families," Sullivan said. (The Sanders campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)
Clinton has regularly attacked both Sanders and her other Democratic opponent, former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, for being willing to raise taxes on people she terms middle classa broad definition that reaches nearly to the top tier of incomes.........................................
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The right wing talking points and spin are dizzying!
Twirl twirl twirl!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Telling lies to deceive voters and harm reputations comes at a price.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)That guy is the daddy of all Propaganda Catapulters.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I was enamored of the Clintons at that time, so many years back. But times do change, and so did I.
Autumn
(45,066 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)will have wait for the Sanders comments.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)lapfog_1
(29,199 posts)with universal health care seem to be able to pay for it?
Perhaps its because they don't spend as much on their military as we do.
kath
(10,565 posts)Planet. Manages. To. Pay. For. Universal. Healthcare. Without. Going. Bankrupt.
(Kinda reminds me of the old "News for the Hard-of-Hearing" on SNL )
bvf
(6,604 posts)Or à la "Slow Talkers of America," by Bob and Ray (for us old-timers).
I'm old,but I guess not THAT old.
Will have to Google it.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)I love universal healthcare and know a great deal about how it functions as well. It's a wonderful thing. It's also extremely expensive, politically radioactive, and has a lot of problems of its own - even though it looks simple from far away. Think about the VA hospital system - it's rife with problems. Everyone agrees that veterans deserve the best possible care and that the government has a duty to supply it to them - it's one of the few things that people across the political spectrum agree on - and yet fixing those problems and making the VA work properly is a slow and painful process. Universal socialized healthcare will be orders of magnitude more problematic. I am very much for it, but I am also completely distrustful of anyone who tells me how simple it will be, because they're either clueless or lying.
Over-simplifying an issue and underestimating its real complexity does just as much a disservice to people as throwing up your hands and saying its impossible. In many ways I think it's worse because when people run into the inevitable disappointments, they're much less inclined to support further reforms.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)as they do here.
An example: My dentist told me to use a tooth-guard at night, since I apparently
grind my teeth when I'm asleep. I dropped into a drug store, and the price was
$35. I thought it was kind of high for a small piece of plastic. I checked into a
sporting goods store, and the tooth-guard (used by boxers) cost $6.
The price was about 6 times lower for the same thing!! In this country, anything
connected with medicine will automatically go up in price -- and very dramatically!!
I hope Bernie and Elizabeth will both fight this greed as a team. What a great team
they will make!
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)We need to face up to the reality that we are a second rate country with a first rate military.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)and items not covered. They are tired of paying more than any other county while having a health care system that does not provide good care.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Her credibility has sunk that deep, after Chelsea's "misspeaking".
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Under the current system people/businesses are forced to pay for private insurance coverage. It is a mandate, so it is just like a tax, except the people whop decide the rates and terms are corporate bean counters and extortionists.
Under Bernie's plan, people would pay for universal Medicare type coverage. Like SS, it would be mandatory. But unlike the mandatory private insurance fees people have to pay now, it would take out the corporate profits and waste, and families would end up better off for less money.
One can debate whether they prefer that or the prersent system. But Clinton's attacks are just a Democrat version of GOP Harry and Louise Tea Bag Talking points.
If Clinton had truly consistent values and commitment to universal coverage, she would challenge Sanders without amplifying right wing GOP talking points against the concept.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Sometimes it's good to read before posting the trademarked smarm and rofl emoticon.
.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Close enough to right wing propaganda for me.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)any kind of exposure (for Sanders) in the media is bad bad news for the preferred status quo candidate. Any kind of unrehearsed exposure in the media (for Clinton) is merely bad news for the preferred status quo candidate.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)Will the private insurance companies still be involved in that, as they are now?
riversedge
(70,204 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)You are asking for a lot of very detailed specifics.
I will assume that you are being sincere, and not concern trolling. If so, I suggest you google everything you can find, and contract his campaign with your questions.
While I agree that he should release an outline of what his ideal plan would be, whats is most important at this point is to push the conversation in the direction of the general principle of moving to a single payer system that would be the equivalent of a universal expansion of Medicare to cover everyone.
Healthcare is a very complex system. There would have to be many details worked out.
Bernie is not going to be able to walk into the Oval Office on Inauguration Day and issue an Executive Order that instantly transforms the healthcare system. He may try to submit an overall plan and let Congress have at it. Or he might take an incremental approach (partly based on the make up of Congress) and start with a public option as step one. If so we would still have a mixed system and the questions like supplemental insurance and how the non -covered deductibles might be covered, etc. will be relevant.
But whatever he proposes is going to be hashed out, and picked apart and negotiated by Congress and -- by extension -- be subjected to widespread public debate and modification.
What is important at this stage is the overall basic principle, goal and plan, not all of the tress that obscure the forest, or hypotheticals that may or may not be relevant at crtain points in the future.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)in my field I am always happy to accept Medicare patients. I do so against my personal financial interests because I believe that doing otherwise discriminates against the elderly, and because I support the vision of some awesome Democrats in the 1960's for a Great Society that gave us Medicare, the Civil Rights acts, the Voting Rights Act, and so much more. I know how hard it was to get those things and how unlikely it would be to get them today if they did not already exist. I hope the day will come when we have genuine universal health care, and it is frustrating when people act as if it will just magically fall into place. When this is practically the centerpiece of someone's campaign, I think it is legitimate to ask for specifics and to persist when brushed off with platitudes and bromides (not meaning you). It is indeed a very complex subject and disappointing in such a Bernie-rich environment as DU that it is so hard to get useful information. Thanks for at least making an effort.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)My own preference is (was) an incremental movement to single payer, starting with a public option (with appropriate provisions for providers) that would demonstrate to people that public insurance is not the end of the world, but would actually benefit people in their own pocketbooks, in addition to being the right thing to do.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)a comprehensive universal system. No copays. No deductibles. No out of pocket expenses. That system replaces Medicaid and Medicare and the federal employee system and expands coverage to everyone from birth to death.
Yes taxes will go up. The details on funding are being worked out but will include an increase in the payroll tax. For both employers and employees in the current for profit system this will likely be a reduction in costs.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....I welcome this. It couldn't happen too soon for me.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)How did the bill do in the Senate?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)The kleptocracy is not going to cede control without a struggle.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)The media is starting to pay attention to what she says and what Bernie has proposed. Which is good for all of us.