Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jfern

(5,204 posts)
1. Gravis is such a crappy pollster that they're not even consistent with themselves
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:18 PM
Jan 2016

And they once had a national poll with Webb at 12% and Chafee at 8%. Even if Overtime Politics is making up numbers, they're still a better pollster than Gravis.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
8. I think he found the animated gif first,
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:31 PM
Jan 2016

then went in search for something to attach it to.

Not at all surprised to hear that wrt Gravis, btw.

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
6. I wouldn't get too excited over a Gravis poll.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jan 2016

I think IA is gonna be a nail-biter. Lots of variables that afftect caucus turnout that pollsters can't control.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
11. And yet it's the one polling outfit that agrees with Nate's off the wall predictions for Iowa and NH
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:35 PM
Jan 2016

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
10. On one hand, it's Gravis, on the other, they have a strong sample
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:33 PM
Jan 2016

and a 3% margin of error. Many of the polls putting Bernista ahead have a large margin of error, 5% or more.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Iowa Shock Poll-HRC 57% S...