2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe trouble with Bernie: A moralizing scold, but for the left
This article is not about Bernie's policies but rather his potential presidential leadership style based on his past and current leadership style.
Here's an excerpt from the article with provided below:
Here's my problem with Bernie Sanders. With few exceptions, I agree with his positions on issues. But I don't like him or his political temperament. He'd be an awful president.
I followed him carefully when I was editor of the Burlington Free Press in Vermont. Sanders was the state's sole congressman, lived in Burlington, and would periodically visit with the newspaper's editors and publisher.
Considering that the Free Press' editorial positions were very liberal, reflecting the nature of a very liberal Vermont community, one might think that meetings with Sanders were cordial, even celebratory.
They weren't. Sanders was always full of himself: pious, self-righteous and utterly humorless. Burdened by the cross of his socialist crusade, he was a scold whose counter-culture moralizing appealed to the state's liberal sensibilities as well as its conservatives, who embraced his gun ownership stance, his defense of individual rights, an antipathy toward big corporations and, generally speaking, his stick-it-to-them approach to politics.
http://lansingcitypulse.com/article-12189-The-trouble-with-Bernie.html
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The author is a crybaby who's whining because Bernie doesn't suffer fools gladly. Ever wonder why no one's heard of him and hundreds of thousands support Bernie?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)riversedge
(70,205 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Shame, shame, shame on you.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)who pays her.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)is that moralizing enough for ya?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)why is that?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and you're welcome!
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Gotta make the point that Bernie can sometimes be a little grouchy
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)draa
(975 posts)I'd also say who cares. If he rubs people the wrong way then good. Some of the crooks, in both parties as well as our business community, need to be put in their place and being nice just won't cut it.
We need an asshole, and if Sanders is that asshole, then he's our asshole and I'm fine with that.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)both the magazine and US voters seem to overwhelmingly disagree.
Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #11)
underthematrix This message was self-deleted by its author.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)You must have completely missed my point.
Oh wait, you're not confused, you just dodn't WANT to 'get' my point.
I get it now. So never mind.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)livetohike
(22,142 posts)it's coming.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)gonna do like Tina Turner. Start out easy then go hard.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)What liberal legislation has passed since the Republicans took back the House?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)HRC at one of her many fine points.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Autumn
(45,068 posts)I can't wait till we are back to Gunsday
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Bernie has been described as the kind of person who falls asleep at night thinking about how to deal with tax issues affecting his constituents. He's supposed to have a pretty weak sense of humor and to be pretty obsessive about numbers and policy.
GOOD.
That means he's the guy who isn't swayed by his buddies in congress who make deals with a wink and a handshake and an expensive dinner paid for by the lobbyists. He's not the guy who runs every policy and every speech through a panel of media consultants to see what plays best with the relevant demographics. He's a straightforward, bluff honest man who tries to find the best way to solve problems, and if part of the best way to solve a problem annoys someones sensibilities then tough cookies.
After decades of polished shiny suits practising the right way to gesture and smile and pitch their voice for the public gaze, its about damned time America got a policy wonk who doesn't give a damn about how his hair looks, and who just wants to make the country better for his grandkids and everyone elses families.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)Including the author of this article, who admits he was "hectoring" Sanders.
I like him even more!
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)After he was questioned as to why he hadn't done anything to promote & endorse progressive candidates for office. And he still doesn't.
Why is that? How does President Bernie plan on getting his agenda through Congress if he doesn't help the people who'll get it passed elected?
American government is not and has never been a one-man band. I don't like Bernie realizes that. Or cares.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Bernie hasn't explained the process for how he would get things done
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And the same people who are perfectly fine with that - even enthusiastic in their ignorance - are mad at Hillary because she's not transparent enough.
The mind boggles.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)It's almost as if they do not understand the basics of how government works. But I wonder if it's same anger that motivates the Trump supporters. The basics of Bernie's policies such as universal healthcare is a good one. But how do you go from repealing Obamacare 65 times to universal healthcare in 2017? How does Bernie not tell the truth about the environment in which any DEM president will have to operate? You're right. It's mind boggling.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)as I'm in the same boat - admiring Bernie's goals, but very skeptical of how he intends to implement them. I think you have hit the nail on the head - his supporters are not very knowledgeable about or interested in the workings of government, they just expect him to appoint a mix of surrogates and technocrats to his cabinet and get things done with a mixture of cheerleading and natural expertise. They figure Bernie has been in DC so long that he knows how it works.
I'm a bit skeptical about that and think the GOP would go on the offensive within hours of the inauguration if he somehow won (which I cannot see happening). The GOP has done OK for the last few years by being an obstructionist party, plus any time they try to be even vaguely bipartisan the tea partiers revolt and right now they seem to hold the upper hand.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)And his treatment of an ostensive ally when his responsability to the progressive movement is questioned sealed it.
I wonder if Bernie has a "enemies list" squirrled away? And how many progressive Democrats are on it?
riversedge
(70,205 posts)and lecturing all the time. That is what it would be like if by some miracle he won the oval office.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)riversedge
(70,205 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)I'm just tired of having presidents that pick the low hanging fruit. I'd rather have a more aggressive leader who would shake the whole damn tree. We're getting fleeced, and I need a fighter, not a diplomat. That is only my opinion.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)someone where to go and bingo problem solved. Leadership is not just about espousing ideas, it's also about moving from ideas to policies to FUNDED laws. A real leader understands you have to work with people you don't agree with, respect, or like.
HRC demonstrates she understands the political landscape and how to navigate it.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)but this article expresses many of my hesitations about him as a candidate. I honestly do not see him with the tact required to deal credibly with leaders on the global stage. For example, this sends up a LOT of red flags for me:
They characterize the senator as rude, short-tempered and, occasionally, downright hostile. Though Sanders has spent much of his life fighting for working Vermonters, they say he mistreats the people working for him, Heintz wrote. Among those he cited was Steve Rosenfeld, Sanders' press secretary during his 1990 House campaign, and author of In Making History in Vermont.
"At his best, Sanders is a skilled reader and manipulator of people and events," Rosenfeld wrote in his account of the campaign. "At his worst, he falls prey to his own emotions, is unable to practice what he preaches (though he would believe otherwise) and exudes a contempt for those he derides, including his staff."
His unwillingness to endorse progressive candidates in his own state, described in the article, also bothers me. He's a loner by nature, when we are in dire need of building coalitions.
In essence, this:
retrowire
(10,345 posts)We have tons of facts and real data to show how well he's pushed forth things in our government.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Vinca
(50,269 posts)The reporter must have rubbed him the wrong way for some reason. Or maybe the reporter is confusing passion and anger. He's got a great sense of humor.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Yupy
(154 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I live in Michigan and have never heard of him.
If his feelings were once hurt by Bernie, then so be it. Maybe having a political leader who does not kiss the backside of every reporter he/she talks to would be a good thing.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)It seems many, including myself, believe Bernie would do just that MUCH better than anyone else does. That's much more important than whether or not I want to have a beer with him. That kind of thinking simply has to stop.
I have also been very pleased with his sense of humor during this campaign. He is quite witty, and he seems exactly the opposite of being smug and full of himself. I would use those descriptors for another candidate in this primary, and I believe MANY others would agree.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...with Hillary, FWIW.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)when you would think they would be acquaintances, at the very most.
I think Senator Sanders will do fine as President.
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-bernie-sanders-fundraising/
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)"who embraced his gun ownership stance"? No thanks!
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Gee, I want my president to be agreeable, sweet, pleasant, and ready to compromise.
That's a lie, I don't want that at all.
My view is I think the Clintons and Bushes have had their turn, and that's enough of that.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)And that's why I worried when he announced his candidacy.
I was a fan of him as a Senator, where he can make some real progress, and can learn to cope with peers.
But I've worked with several progressive orgs in DC as a consultant, and I am always disheartened at how their anger at injustice get projected at their staff, where turnover is high.
Bernie is one of them. He's great one-on-one with his constituents and people like Sandra Bland's family, but you can't be an effective president if people can't stand to work with you and for you.
The fact that he completely ignores non-partisan, independent think tanks on health policy - and contradicts them - on the possibility of Single Payer, both politically and financially shows me that he doesn't listen.
I feel the same way about politicians who ignore climate scientists, and the women's health medical associations.