Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Loudestlib

(980 posts)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 11:55 AM Jan 2016

Hillary Clinton: 'We now have driven costs down to the lowest they've been in 50 years'

We rate her claim as False.

Clinton said during the debate, "We now have driven costs down to the lowest they've been in 50 years."

When we contacted the Clinton campaign, spokesman Nick Merrill said what Clinton was actually talking about was the rate at which health care costs have been going up.

But we did find, more to the point that Clinton's campaign says Clinton was trying to make, that health care spending at the time had grown slower than at any time in the previous 50 years. Those data come from 2009 and 2010, and preliminary estimates from 2011 were showing a similar trend.

However, that may not be true anymore.

Although the rate of growth has been at historic lows, the actual per-person cost of health care has increased steadily over the last half century. Only the rate of decline has slowed, a very different measure. The Clinton campaign acknowledges that the candidate misspoke.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jan/18/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-we-now-have-driven-costs-down-tgo-/

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: 'We now have driven costs down to the lowest they've been in 50 years' (Original Post) Loudestlib Jan 2016 OP
I yelled at the TV when she said that. Avalux Jan 2016 #1
yes. due to the greedy medical health facility and hopemountain Jan 2016 #24
Not sure who's paying her premiums. EndElectoral Jan 2016 #2
I am Quite Certain We Are! At Worst as A 68 Y/o She IS Medicare Pt. Someone Should Ask Her CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #6
Grown slower, is lower, yada yada... they accomplished a lot with it no matter what category uponit7771 Jan 2016 #3
She thought no one would look up the numbers kenfrequed Jan 2016 #4
"candidate misspoke" = Candidate KNOWINGLY LIED. in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #5
I usually assume that everything she says is a lie Doctor_J Jan 2016 #7
clearly she misspoke dsc Jan 2016 #8
If you base that on a 2013 report from the White House, you are way out of date. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #14
I haven't done the math for the entire time since the ADA dsc Jan 2016 #15
You can't just make unsubstantiated claims and expect to be taken seriously. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #16
Here from the wall street journal dsc Jan 2016 #17
You sure are trying hard, but failing miserably .... Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #18
SHE LIED Odin2005 Jan 2016 #20
that is ridiculous dsc Jan 2016 #23
Hillary IS The Grand Marshall For Preserving The Status Quo... CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #9
Cost lower? nope Runningdawg Jan 2016 #10
Didn't she just prove that she either knows nothing about this subject... Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #11
She does that on a pretty regular basis....as to both of your comments. libdem4life Jan 2016 #12
ANOTHER LIE. kath Jan 2016 #13
Clinton is a professional liar for the 1%. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #19
Yeah, I knew that was false as soon as she said it jfern Jan 2016 #21
While I'm sure she meant 'health care inflation' forest444 Jan 2016 #22
Who does she think she is fooling? Does she take us for fools and suckers? Bernblu Jan 2016 #25
Yes, she does. n/t djean111 Jan 2016 #26

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
1. I yelled at the TV when she said that.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jan 2016

Personally, I have a good job and employer provided health insurance. I am paying MORE this year than the past several years. A lot more, to the tune of around $1500.

Hillary says things with such conviction, even though she knows it's not true. I don't trust her and never will.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
24. yes. due to the greedy medical health facility and
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jan 2016

pharmaceutical corportations, aarp, and the medical professional organizations. this is why single payer is going to be the only way to bring down medical costs. providers have too much power and say on medical charges and speak only for their boards and ceo's.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
6. I am Quite Certain We Are! At Worst as A 68 Y/o She IS Medicare Pt. Someone Should Ask Her
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:12 PM
Jan 2016

It would be funny... She does not want Medicare for All , yet she is on Medicare....

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
3. Grown slower, is lower, yada yada... they accomplished a lot with it no matter what category
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:01 PM
Jan 2016

... she decides to laud.

Word smithing for the most part cause this doesn't change the over all message that there's no since in starting that whole fight over again, building on the imperfect ACA makes more sense

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
4. She thought no one would look up the numbers
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jan 2016

But the odd thing is that most people KNOW that healthcare costs have gone up.

I honestly think that this "misstatement" might cause her a lot of trouble.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
7. I usually assume that everything she says is a lie
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jan 2016

If it turns out that she said something that's true, I am pleasantly surprised. If I had a chance to ask her a question, it would be, "what do you feel is so bad about Medicare that it should not be available for everyone"?

dsc

(52,161 posts)
8. clearly she misspoke
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:17 PM
Jan 2016

No one thinks that the cost of health care is lower now than it was in 1965. But the rate of increase, which is what any rational person knows she meant is lower. But the rate of increase, which is what she clearly meant, she was 100 percent right.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
14. If you base that on a 2013 report from the White House, you are way out of date.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:00 PM
Jan 2016

Odds are, you are trying to pass this information off as evidence to support Hillary:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/healthcostreport_final_noembargo_v2.pdf



Sorry, that is out of date.

Hillary was either lying or doesn't know what the fuck she is talking about. Or possibly both. 20 years, not 50, 20.


http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2015/11/12/388800.htm


^snip^

U.S. Health Care Cost Increases at Lowest Rate in Nearly 20 years:


After plan design changes and vendor negotiations, the average health care rate increase for mid-size and large companies was 3.2 percent in 2015, marking the lowest rate increase since 1996, according to a new analysis by Aon.

Aon projects average premium increases will jump to 4.1 percent in 2016.







dsc

(52,161 posts)
15. I haven't done the math for the entire time since the ADA
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jan 2016

but I think there is a very good probability that those years had the lowest health care inflation rate since the 60's. Health care inflation has been historically low and the ACA had a great deal to do with that.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
16. You can't just make unsubstantiated claims and expect to be taken seriously.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jan 2016

You said that Hillary is 100% right when she is dead wrong.

There is a word for that.
Propaganda.


dsc

(52,161 posts)
17. Here from the wall street journal
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:47 PM
Jan 2016

The jump comes after five consecutive years of average spending growth of less than 4% annually—a rate touted by the Obama administration as the lowest since the government began tracking health spending in the 1960s and a sign that the health law’s Medicare provisions were helping rein in health costs

Five consecutive years of 4 percent followed by one of 5.5. So that is six years.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-health-spending-growth-jumped-to-5-5-in-2014-1438114020

There is no comprible period since the 1960's not even close. The ADA doesn't deserve all the credit but it deserves a good bit of it. Even the 5.5 which is the highest since 2010, is, in historical terms, on the low side.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
18. You sure are trying hard, but failing miserably ....
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jan 2016

From your own link, the very first paragraph.

WASHINGTON—Growth in national health spending, which had dropped to historic lows in recent years, has snapped back and is set to continue at a faster pace over the next decade, federal actuaries said Tuesday.




Her exact quote was " 'We now have driven costs down to the lowest they've been in 50 years''.

Even if we assume she misspoke and really meant that we have driven down the increase in costs to the lowest they've been in 50 years, she would still be wrong. As you admitted, it has jumped back up to 5.5% and as your link says it is set to continue at a faster pace over the next decade.

There just isn't any way to put her statement into the present tense and make it correct. You can only refer to a short period when we did see a few years when the cost increases were slower. That time has passed. Her statement would need to be in the past tense, referring specifically to those few years, to be correct.


It looks like she both misspoke by not saying "increase in costs" and is wrong by not realizing that costs are again rising at a higher rate than is acceptable to most Americans.

Terrible candidate. Getting facts wrong and misspeaking when presenting them too. I honestly don't see how anyone can want her as our nominee.



dsc

(52,161 posts)
23. that is ridiculous
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:29 PM
Jan 2016

no one on earth believes the cost of health care hasn't risen since 1965. She meant that costs are rising slower than they have been since the 1960's and if one looks at the complete time frame and not just last year, she is right.

Runningdawg

(4,516 posts)
10. Cost lower? nope
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:43 PM
Jan 2016

In 1992 I had an MRI after a car accident. Insurance paid the bill after my $500 deducible was met.
I'm facing abdominal surgery and my Dr has asked for an MRI. The deductible is now $3000 and the testing center has told me I need to pay the deductible before scheduling the test. If I don't have the money, but good credit, they will loan me the money at 22% interest. After discussing this with my Dr she made a few suggestions: 1)Borrow the money from a bank for lower interest. 2) If you don't have good credit sell your car, move to a smaller cheaper apartment, get a third job 3)Don't have the test at all, wait until my issue becomes a true emergency, because in an emergency, they won't ask for the deductible upfront.
So hear I sit, having chosen option #3 wondering how the odds will play out for me.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
11. Didn't she just prove that she either knows nothing about this subject...
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 03:49 PM
Jan 2016

or she will say absolutely anything to gain a few political points?



forest444

(5,902 posts)
22. While I'm sure she meant 'health care inflation'
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:28 PM
Jan 2016

and while, according to official data, her claim would be true if that's what she meant, even giving her that benefit of he doubt her claim would be preposterous.

Because official health care inflation data is preposterous.

Here's what she's basing the claim on:



Who on earth believes health care prices in the U.S. have been going up by 2 to 4% a year since 1995, as the official data claim. If anyone did they'd be in lonely company, I promise you that.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton: 'We now ...