Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 06:56 PM Jan 2016

The "socialist" argument is a tough one to defeat...

The "labeling" has already begun.

Bernie Sanders is a "socialist". Donald Trump calls him a "communist".

However, the most recent poll out of New Hampshire shows the "socialist" leading the favored "Democrat" by 27 percentage points? How do we explain that? Would the rest of the country follow New Hampshire and ignore the "labels"?

After all, there are several folks running as "Republicans" and it could easily be argued that they are nowhere near what people perceive to be "Republicans". They are closer to fanaticism of one sort or the other. In my opinion, Bernie Sanders is much closer to being a "Democrat" than they are to being "Republicans".

Party labels have become nothing more than a way to unite the party loyalists and the cultists. They don't mean much anymore. Perhaps people will look beyond the labels and see which candidate is offering the solutions to making us a better country that benefits all of us, rather than just a few multi-millionaires?

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The "socialist" argument is a tough one to defeat... (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2016 OP
That's why I am concerned. NYCButterfinger Jan 2016 #1
McCaskill is a Hillary loyalist.. kentuck Jan 2016 #4
She backed Obama over Hillary in 2008. I don't know how much of loyalist she really is. JRLeft Jan 2016 #9
I wouldn't call her a Hillary loyalist. I don't particularly care for her. Beacool Jan 2016 #18
Won't matter...it's a zero sum play. NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #2
I need help ... earthside Jan 2016 #3
So what? Gore, Kerry, Obama, Clinton Bernin4U Jan 2016 #5
NOT tough to defeat. Ergo popular support. Ergo, polls where folks already identify as s Socialist highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #6
I hope you are right. kentuck Jan 2016 #13
Nobody cares. They have been calling Pres. Obama a Socialist for 8 years. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #7
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #8
Hello, Uncle Joe! kentuck Jan 2016 #14
It's good to see you as well, kentuck. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #15
unfortunately for mccaskill and her ilk, socialism already exists restorefreedom Jan 2016 #10
Bernie is not a pure socialist -- he is a Democratic Socialist Samantha Jan 2016 #11
Thank you for those supportive comments. kentuck Jan 2016 #16
You are very welcome kentuck Samantha Jan 2016 #21
Sanders Is Already Defeating It IMO SDJay Jan 2016 #12
Most modern Democrats have been called Socialists by the Right, Beacool Jan 2016 #17
People are actually concerned about this? pinebox Jan 2016 #19
The anti-Obama propaganda pays off for Bernie. JackRiddler Jan 2016 #20
Red baiting may not work anymore. moondust Jan 2016 #22
 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
9. She backed Obama over Hillary in 2008. I don't know how much of loyalist she really is.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:19 PM
Jan 2016

She is republican lite though.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
18. I wouldn't call her a Hillary loyalist. I don't particularly care for her.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:11 PM
Jan 2016

She once made a very low remark about not trusting Bill around her (then minors) daughters. She apologized, but it's not forgotten. In 2008 she was the first woman in the Senate to support Obama, according to her, because her daughter told her to do so.



earthside

(6,960 posts)
3. I need help ...
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:08 PM
Jan 2016

I don't care if you call it "purple polka-dotism" or "socialism" if it helps makes health care affordable for me, helps me pay for my kids college, and finally goes after the banksters who have screwed us all.

I think in the last analysis that is how most financially distressed Americans are going to feel, too.



Bernin4U

(812 posts)
5. So what? Gore, Kerry, Obama, Clinton
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

All hyper-socialists as far as -they- are concerned.

Someone who, for once, isn't hard-core moderate, makes no difference. Hillary will NOT be any less socialist / communist / whatever extreme evil in these people's eyes.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
6. NOT tough to defeat. Ergo popular support. Ergo, polls where folks already identify as s Socialist
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

Do we really believe that all those people supporting Bernie have not heard that he is a "Socialist"? They have, but they've also heard what he means by it, they've also had some chance now to see and hear him, and they like what they hear and see.

His policies are in the mainstream of what people want in America!!!

Also, there have already been polls asking people what they perceive as their political identity, and the word Socialist has come up repeatedly as one of the items they check!

Not hard to defeat at all. The more people are educated, the more they will realize they like "Socialism". In fact, they crave something like enlightened Socialism.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
7. Nobody cares. They have been calling Pres. Obama a Socialist for 8 years.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

The majority of Americans have gone numb to the word. The people who it does scare won't vote for any Democrat anyways, much less Hillary.


It really doesn't matter.


Besides,

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/17/1471163/-Red-dawn-More-Iowa-Democratic-caucus-goers-identify-as-socialist-than-capitalist


^snip^

A little-noticed data point in the new Selzer & Co. Iowa poll, in fact, shows that 43 percent of likely voters in the Feb. 1 caucuses say they would use the word "socialist" to describe themselves.

And to be very clear, this question was not whether they would vote for a socialist or sympathize with socialism; it's whether they consider themselves socialist.

The 43 percent of likely Iowa Democratic caucus-goers who self-identify as socialist is actually more than the number who identify themselves as capitalist — 38 percent.




restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
10. unfortunately for mccaskill and her ilk, socialism already exists
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:31 PM
Jan 2016

in the form or corporate welfare. people are sick and tired of working their assess off and seeing the richest of the rich live in grotesque wealth after skating on taxes and getting freebies from their lapdog politicians.

what we need is socialist REFORM. the millenials and many in other age groups realize this.

it is what bernie, and only bernie, is bringing to the table.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
11. Bernie is not a pure socialist -- he is a Democratic Socialist
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jan 2016

or was until he changed his registration to Democrat. Before he did that, he explained that a Democratic Socialist is essentially a Democrat but the Socialist part goes a little farther to incorporate the belief that the government should work for all of the people, not just the corporations and the wealthy. I believe the fact that he is not a pure socialist is demonstrated by the reluctance of those who are socialists in Vermont struggling with whether or not to support him.

But it does not matter to me what sort of name-calling the Third Way and/or the Republicans want to throw out there in an attempt to cast a slur on Senator Sanders. I have observed him in action for years and always wanted him to run. I assumed he never would because it would be too much of a drain on a person his age. When he announced, I was ecstatic. I immediately decided to support him, and I will to the bitter (or perhaps the better) end.

He is a hero for just taking this on and speaking out against things that have really bothered a substantial portion of the public for a long time. The man has both guts and stamina.

Sam

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
21. You are very welcome kentuck
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:14 PM
Jan 2016

It is going to be a very rough ride, isn't it, listening to all these disparaging things said about him.

Sam

SDJay

(1,089 posts)
12. Sanders Is Already Defeating It IMO
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:53 PM
Jan 2016

He's doing so by not running scared from the term. When someone asks if he's a Democratic Socialist, it still seems as if everyone expects him to cower and spin and spit and avoid the answer. Instead he simply nods and says, "Yes, I am" and that's the end of it. Sometimes he has to explain that, but he always does so calmly and clearly.

Notice he doesn't run from it like so many ran from the word liberal to the point where it became a really nasty word. I love that he doesn't back down from this and because of that I don't think it'll work if he's the nominee.

I do think tRump will whine and whimper and complain when he's labeled a fascist in the GE, but that's actually true.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
17. Most modern Democrats have been called Socialists by the Right,
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jan 2016

including both Clintons and Obama. The problem with Sanders is that he describes himself as a "Democratic Socialist". The "Socialist" label was not pinned to him by the Right, he did it to himself. Considering that he only joined the party recently, if he were to be the nominee, expect to hear the moniker 24/7.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
19. People are actually concerned about this?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jan 2016

So let me get this straight?
Hillary supporters are worried about this when in fact for some unknown reason this seems a lot more important than;

Email servers?
Benghazi?
Whitewater?
President Clinton's past
Honduras
Iraq
Libya
Syria
Clinton cash
Yemen
Saudi Arabia
"Muslim Brotherhood"
"Negotiated with terrorists"

Pick it. Some of these are RW crap and some of them aren't but to be worried that Bernie is being labeled a "socialist" when you have more crap to choose from than a vending machine when it comes to Hillary (some manufactured) is a reach.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
20. The anti-Obama propaganda pays off for Bernie.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jan 2016

Everyone who would be mobilized to act against a "socialist" based on the label has already been hearing that a socialist is in the White House for eight years!

Not that Bernie qualifies really, by the way. He's just the best we can possibly do today.

moondust

(19,981 posts)
22. Red baiting may not work anymore.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 12:41 AM
Jan 2016

It served the capitalist oligarchs like tRump well for a lot of years during the Cold War, but the Red Scare tactics may not work on younger people today who weren't yet adults during those years. That propaganda relied heavily on the existence of the big scary Soviet Union which hasn't been around now for more than a quarter century.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The "socialist" argument ...