Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumForget Universal Health Care, it is more costly to let people suffer and die.
That is the lie they want you to believe. The truth is national healthcare will cost less.
We can do the financially right thing and the morally right thing. So why aren't we doing it?
And it would mean CHEAPER LABOR costs. For all the talk of creating jobs, this doesn't seem to bother them for some reason.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 618 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forget Universal Health Care, it is more costly to let people suffer and die. (Original Post)
Skwmom
Jan 2016
OP
HRC refuses to answer whether single-payer would lower health care costs. (Video)
antigop
Jan 2016
#1
Um, wait ... A is more costly than B is a lie, in fact B is less costly than A ??
eppur_se_muova
Jan 2016
#4
antigop
(12,778 posts)1. HRC refuses to answer whether single-payer would lower health care costs. (Video)
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)3. Because she knows it will. n/t
antigop
(12,778 posts)2. Hillary Clinton Declares War on Single-Payer Health Care
eppur_se_muova
(36,289 posts)4. Um, wait ... A is more costly than B is a lie, in fact B is less costly than A ??
Problem with logic in the title.