2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI am proud to stand with SMART in their endorsement of Hillary Clinton
SMART General President Joseph Sellers, Jr., said, She has the real-world experience and dedication that makes her the right candidate to serve the interests of Americas working families in these turbulent times.
Sellers noted that Secretary Clintons plans are detailed and well-reasoned. On the economy, she will build on our apprenticeship and training programs, expand and improve freight transportation and transit and address environmental concerns with investments in energy efficiency. All of these involve jobs that members earn their living in every day.
smart-union.org/...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)More bullshit obfuscation from union bigwigs
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)all they have left I guess. How many of those endorsements for Hillary were based on member polls? I would like to see that.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)David Brock = Glenn Greenwald.
Done.
snoringvoter
(178 posts)based on their "issues" polls?
Nice to see that you're blindly accepting whatever bullhockey Clinton feeds you.
You can stand with them, but the members knows it's not Clinton.
bvf
(6,604 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Sir, or madame, I will stand with whomever I choose and I would defend to my last breath your right to stand with whomeve you choose. I suspect that is the difference between us, yey, pluralism.
Earnestly and respectfully,
DSB
P.S. I would be remiss if I didn't thank you for bumping my thread,
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Of course you can stand with anyone you like but if you stand with the Establishment, the Wealthy 1%, the banksters that crashed the market for profits, then it's only fair to question whether you really believe in Democratic (and democratic as far as that goes) principles.
It's very simple: Clinton is a wealthy member of the 1%, the American Aristocrats, and has close relationships with those that brought the crash of 2008. While Sen Sanders is appealing to those that are outspoken against the corruption of the Wash DC Establishment.
I bet most of Clinton's endorsement get negotiated over martini's. In Nov the honest hardworking Americans will stand up to the plutocrats that use their money to run our government.
mcar
(42,307 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)Nope.
SMART surveyed its diverse membership on the 2016 election in December. The poll focused on issues, not candidates, in order for member feedback to guide the unions electoral efforts in every race, at every level, in 2016 and beyond.
Members overwhelmingly chose jobs and the economy as their most vital interest. On qualifications, members indicated they want leaders to possess the competency, broad experience and serious approach necessary to tackle the nations difficult domestic and international challenges.
These, combined with the memberships preference, led the SMART General Executive Council to approve Secretary Clinton for the Unions support.
Seems union leadership has no problem throwing it's own members under buses.
https://smart-union.org/news/smart-endorses-clinton-for-president/
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will give it all the attention it deserves.
Earnestly and respectfully,
DSB
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)Rec'd you post by the way. Earnesty (apparently not a real word) deserves credit.
Earnestly and respectfully, backatcha.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Encyclopedia.
ear·nest 1 (ûr?nĭst)
adj.
Showing or expressing sincerity or seriousness: an earnest gesture of goodwill. See Synonyms at serious.
Idiom:
in earnest
1. With a purposeful or sincere intent: settled down to study in earnest for the examination.
2. Serious; determined: "Both sides are deeply in earnest, with passions that approximate those of civil war" (Conor Cruise O'Brien).
[Middle English ernest, from Old English eornoste; see er- in Indo-European roots.]
ear?nest·ly adv.
ear?nest·ness n.
BTW, I am not thick...I understand there are folks who believe just about every HRC endorsement is illegitimate. That begs the question. If nobody likes her she is going to get crushed in the Primary so why complain now?
Just sit back and relax and have the last laugh at poor Ole DSB's expense.
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)Your spelling is just fine my friend.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If all these endorsements are bogus and consequently worthless and nobody likes her she will be crushed in the Primary.
I guess we will be finding out soon if that hypothesis is correct.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Strawman. No one has made that claim. People in power, the Establishment, Goldman-Sachs and other crooked banksters, Wall Street, the Wealth 1%, all love her and will use their powers (of which you apparently appreciate) to push their candidate HRC into the WH. They think the People be damned. They will use every trick at their disposal including the corporate media that I am guessing you are giving a pass to as long as they support HRC. They will use Citizens United to HRC's advantage, and again apparently her supporters are ok with that.
In Sen Sanders a movement is growing. A movement for honesty in government and an end to the corruption of Big Money. All Democrats should be on board.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the Corp-Media and shenanigans. Of course the Establishment is supporting HRC because they want their share of the take.
We are fighting the corruption of Big Money in our government. All Democrats should.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)of the Establishment. So do you embrace the Establishment? Those that brought us the Iraq War and the Banking "Crash"? The Wealthy 1% that has sent our jobs to China and kicked millions out of their homes? The Establishment that has given us a huge prison population, militarized the local police and Prisons for Profit. H. Clinton represents the Establishment, which is not surprising since she has a huge personal fortune of her own. I am sure she sympathizes with us but not to the extent where the profits of the Aristocracy are endangered.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)All this standing you're doing must be exhausting!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)choose to vote for might well be different.
Just sayin'.
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/01/22/bernie-sanders-gets-group-endorsements-when-members-decide-hillary-clinton-when