Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:49 PM Jan 2016

Brand New ARG poll in Iowa: Sanders 48%; Clinton 45%; O'Malley 3% (S 55%; C 38%; O 3% in 18-49 demo)

Here is a link to the ARG polling data:

48% - Sanders
45% - Clinton
3% - O'Malley

Interesting internal numbers on 18-49 year olds:

55% - Sanders
38% - Clinton
3% - O'Malley

Also, look at the split among those (regardless of age) who were polled by cell phone (versus landline):

53% - Sanders
38% - Clinton
3% - O'Malley
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brand New ARG poll in Iowa: Sanders 48%; Clinton 45%; O'Malley 3% (S 55%; C 38%; O 3% in 18-49 demo) (Original Post) Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 OP
ARG is biased for Bernie. With the margin of error, Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #1
You can't give her the entire MOE and say she is ahead. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #7
Not in the two sub-groups identified in the OP Goblinmonger Jan 2016 #12
I see how you might want to cling to that, but compare ARG to the other live phone polls: Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #13
Thanks for that thoughtful reply. Most illuminating. eom Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #21
Excellent breakdown!!! draa Jan 2016 #27
Very nice summary. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #29
ARG is a crummy pollster KingFlorez Jan 2016 #2
If ARG was right, Coo Coo Ernst would not be a Senator right now. Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #6
I guess you prefer Opinion Research Corp which had Sanders up by 8% or Quinnipiac with Sanders up 5% Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #15
If Nate Silver was always right, Donald Trump would have dropped out by now. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #26
Silver had Jeb! as "inevitable" and Trump as "inconceivable." It's not that he's wrong; it's just Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #37
Most polls and ALL trendlines are for Bernie. senz Jan 2016 #3
Naturally. Most polls and ALL trendlines are biased for Bernie. closeupready Jan 2016 #4
Yes, Hill fans flocked to this thread to tell us just that. senz Jan 2016 #9
exactly! Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #36
Not a good track record for ARG. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #5
Truth is, caucuses are by their nature tough to poll. TDale313 Jan 2016 #10
Forcast is for snow so that will also be a factor. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #11
By all means -- pray for snow. We Democrats always want to suppress the vote! Right? Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #14
Are you freaking kidding me? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #16
If you were not hoping for a reduced turn out, I withdraw the comparison. If you were hoping for a Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #17
Where the hell was I hoping? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #18
I await your response to this poster below. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #24
I presume that poster also inferred from the context that you were glad for the forecast of snow. If Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #32
You presume the poster is being sarcastic but jumped on me and called me rove. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #33
I own an all-wheel drive vehicle... DaGimpster Jan 2016 #19
Glad you are helping out. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #25
GOOD! That should keep the OLD PEOPLE at HOME! John Poet Jan 2016 #22
Really? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #23
It's really the COLD that'll keep me in. John Poet Jan 2016 #30
You want old people to stay home and not vote? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #31
If I could pick who actually votes in Iowa? John Poet Jan 2016 #34
I didn't find the humor in it. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #35
GO BERNIE! in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #8
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #20
K+R!!! draa Jan 2016 #28
Figures that most Clinton supporters are old people. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #38
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
7. You can't give her the entire MOE and say she is ahead.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:57 PM
Jan 2016

That claim makes as much sense as saying Bernie is really 13% ahead.


Both are ridiculous.


I will agree that this is a virtual tie, but you can't claim Hillary to be slightly ahead based on this poll.




 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
12. Not in the two sub-groups identified in the OP
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:06 PM
Jan 2016

The cell phone one should scare the shit out of Clinton. Most people don't have land lines.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
13. I see how you might want to cling to that, but compare ARG to the other live phone polls:
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:44 PM - Edit history (1)

Here is how the race in Iowa has developed according to ARG:



Here is how the race in Iowa has developed according to the aggregation of ALL live phone polling (including those, like Loras, which have a HUGE pro-Clinton house effect):



When comparing the two charts, note that the ARG chart goes back only to June so the left quarter of the all polls chart includes numbers that predate the earliest ARG Iowa polling this cycle.

ARG had Clinton steady while other polls showed her falling in the summer and fall, and ARG has her losses plateauing in January whereas the other polls indicate the Clinton free fall isn't over.

ARG has not shown much house effect and has certainly not shown a pro-Sanders house effect.

Also, ARG is a live cell and landline phone poll of likely caucus goers. That's pretty much the top of the line in terms of methodology.

No one is saying this poll predicts doom for Clinton or that a poll takes the place of the actual caucus a week from now. However, if you are a Sanders campaign worker freezing his or her ass off in Iowa, this is a nice confirmation that all of the hard work is paying off and Sanders is on the right track. One more week of hard campaigning left in Iowa and then on to New Hampshire and Nevada!

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
15. I guess you prefer Opinion Research Corp which had Sanders up by 8% or Quinnipiac with Sanders up 5%
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:20 PM
Jan 2016

Me too!

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
37. Silver had Jeb! as "inevitable" and Trump as "inconceivable." It's not that he's wrong; it's just
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:56 AM
Jan 2016

that he's offering a snapshot in time and this picture evolves as new data comes in. New data is coming in and Silver's model will narrow (because of the way Silver values endorsements, Sanders will always be Silver's underdog, but Silver will show the race tightening).

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
4. Naturally. Most polls and ALL trendlines are biased for Bernie.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:53 PM
Jan 2016

The reality is, Hillary is WAY ahead, by a HUGE margin.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
9. Yes, Hill fans flocked to this thread to tell us just that.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:58 PM
Jan 2016

They sure do get excited about polls.

Here's what I learned from them:

All polls showing Bernie ahead are invalid.

All polls showing Hillary ahead are solid.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
10. Truth is, caucuses are by their nature tough to poll.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jan 2016

I think all this tells us is it seems to be close. Could go either way, and will come to turnout, which relies on organization (adv Hillary?) and enthusiasm (possible adv Bernie?)

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
16. Are you freaking kidding me?
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:23 PM
Jan 2016

I mention the snow forcast and you are accusing me of voter suppression and being Karl Rove!


Are you for real?

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
17. If you were not hoping for a reduced turn out, I withdraw the comparison. If you were hoping for a
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:25 PM
Jan 2016

reduced voter turn out, it kinda seems Rovian.

We're Democrats -- we want to expand the vote and not hope for circumstances which make it hard for people to vote.

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I withdrew the Rove reference.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
18. Where the hell was I hoping?
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jan 2016

I said there is snow in the forcast. That will be a factor.

Seems like you just want to call me names.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
32. I presume that poster also inferred from the context that you were glad for the forecast of snow. If
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jan 2016

that was not your intent, I'm glad that we agree that as Democrats we should want to encourage turnout and not hope for conditions unfavorable for a high turnout (because that is what Republicans do).

I presume the other pose is being sarcastic.

If not, I agree it is a completely un-Democratic sentiment.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
33. You presume the poster is being sarcastic but jumped on me and called me rove.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:53 PM
Jan 2016

Its called you have double standards.

DaGimpster

(130 posts)
19. I own an all-wheel drive vehicle...
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jan 2016

... and will be taking any neighbors who need a ride.

All jokes aside though, in '08 it was wicked cold out here, but no snow. It certainly could have implications for all candidates.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
30. It's really the COLD that'll keep me in.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:48 PM
Jan 2016

The snow just tends to come with it.


If it weren't for their politics, I'd live in Arizona...

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
34. If I could pick who actually votes in Iowa?
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:57 PM
Jan 2016

SURE, why not? Then my candidate would be sure to win.

NO, seriously, I would like EVERYONE to vote who is ELIGIBLE--
(which would actually include more independents than Democrats).
That work for you?

Actually, I was making a joke about myself but you H folks are particularly humorless of late, are you not? I can certainly understand why you would be, now.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Brand New ARG poll in Iow...