Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:40 AM Jan 2016

Ten New York Gay Politicians To Endorse Hillary Clinton

Ten New York gay politicians are expected to endorse Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential ambitions on Tuesday.

According to the New York Daily News, among those backing Clinton are New York Senator Brad Hoylman, Assembly members Deborah Glick and Daniel O'Donnell of Manhattan, Harry Bronson of Rochester, and Matthew Titone of Staten Island, and New York City Council members James Vacca, Daniel Dromm, Corey Johnson, Rosie Mendez and James Van Bramer.

http://www.ontopmag.com/article/22205/Ten_New_York_Gay_Politicians_To_Endorse_Hillary_Clinton
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ten New York Gay Politicians To Endorse Hillary Clinton (Original Post) SecularMotion Jan 2016 OP
Clinton will gladly take their endorsements. Just don't expect her Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #1
Did you forget this ? DURHAM D Jan 2016 #3
Show me the picture. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #4
Here DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #5
So the only couple she wanted to be with is rich enough to be 0.1%. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #6
Dear Ms. Karlson DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #7
Respectfully, DSB, you took me at my word, and supplied a photo. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #8
I care about everybody DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #9
Until 2012/ 2013, Clinton did not want me to be married. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #10
Just as Joe Biden and Barack Obama... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #11
Clinton "changed" her mind after polls showed NOt supporting gay marriage was Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #17
She was a Goldwater girl in high school. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #20
Goldwater was in favour in 1993, while Hillary was supporting DADT. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #23
Bill Clinton wanted to totally lift the ban... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #38
Bill has openly said his wife has a problem with gays. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #44
If you believe Hillary Clinton is a homophobe there ... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #46
and Bernie only wanted you to be married dsc Jan 2016 #45
Never try to convince somebody to believe something their whole world view is contingent... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #47
But Bernie Sanders wanted you neighbor to be able to have a gun... brooklynite Jan 2016 #13
So did Hillary "Annie Oakley" Clinton. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #15
Ayup. senz Jan 2016 #22
I am so grateful for millennials like you, Betty Karlson. senz Jan 2016 #33
They're still bitter about the HRC endorsement, don't waste your time. misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #34
the Human Rights Campaign okasha Jan 2016 #12
The establishment doesn't take notice of my opinions - or of the rest of the 99%. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #16
Oh, twaddle. okasha Jan 2016 #26
Sweetie, I'm gay too, remember? Ask my man of you don't believe me. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #32
if you say so. okasha Jan 2016 #36
I am not going to impugn anybody's integrity... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #48
K & R Iliyah Jan 2016 #2
And we know it can't be a back-room deal, because Gays. Bernin4U Jan 2016 #14
Self-defeating behavior on their part. senz Jan 2016 #18
She opposed marriage equality for moral and religious reasons. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #19
I think we both know senz Jan 2016 #25
Fun huh? Fearless Jan 2016 #28
Rec ing for one reason. These are the Don't Rock the Boat Endorsements and they are a libdem4life Jan 2016 #21
"And gay? Who cares about that? " okasha Jan 2016 #30
That's right. Who cares. Gay or straight or bi or trans or queer or lesbian...people finally libdem4life Jan 2016 #35
It was your own silly question. okasha Jan 2016 #37
First of all, I guess the question in question is "Who cares?" Second of all, there isn't a libdem4life Jan 2016 #40
So by "cares about" you mean okasha Jan 2016 #43
Absolutely...I should have taken more notice of your graphic. Sorry. Yes, I and my family, libdem4life Jan 2016 #49
When will the Human Rights Campaign realize that VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #24
Well, some are cynical but some are well-intenioned and uninformed. senz Jan 2016 #27
Great!!! Beacool Jan 2016 #29
I know several of them and I proudly stand with my fellow LGBT NYers in endorsing Hillary. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #31
Me too. For those today, tomorrow & those who have gone & only dreamed of such a Candidate like HRC misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #39
All political endorsements are business transactions. Maedhros Jan 2016 #41
Then in this case, its about time. misterhighwasted Jan 2016 #42
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
1. Clinton will gladly take their endorsements. Just don't expect her
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jan 2016

to be photographed with a gay family. Gays make her uncomfortable - even more so than millennials. And millennial gays: let's not even go there.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
6. So the only couple she wanted to be with is rich enough to be 0.1%.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jan 2016

And well over 60. Establishment. Pathetic.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
7. Dear Ms. Karlson
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016

Dear Ms. Karlson, you requested, errr demanded a photo of Hillary Clinton with a gay family:


Show me the picture.

There isn't a single frame Clinton has shared with a gay family



and I dutifully supplied you with one. Rather than admit your error you doubled down on your invective and threw in a ageist comment as well:

So the only couple she wanted to be with is rich enough to be 0.1%.And well over 60. Establishment. Pathetic.


Dear Ms. Karlson, I will , as always, rise above the fray, be the bigger person, and not respond in kind, other then to say raising money to fight AIDS strikes me as a good thing.

Always respectfully,
DSB
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
8. Respectfully, DSB, you took me at my word, and supplied a photo.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:28 PM
Jan 2016

Well done. I guess that when debating with Clinton's supporters, one should always be VERY clear that speaking of families, our sides usually thinks of ordinary men and women.

Being a millennial, I'd like to see someone from camp Clinton care about any ordinary person under 40, and how all the deck is stacked against us. But then, such a request is so specific, that fulfillment is unlikely for anyone not named Chelsea - precisely because she was lifted above the stacked deck from an early age on.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
9. I care about everybody
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

That was the only photo I could find. I am sure Hillary has taken photos with glbtq folks in all kinds of arrangements.

Oh, she and me care about everybody and want the best for em...

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
17. Clinton "changed" her mind after polls showed NOt supporting gay marriage was
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

a losing position in the primaries. Has she ever been on the right side of history before the rght side became fashionable? This is a former Republican (Goldwater girl) we are talking about.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
20. She was a Goldwater girl in high school.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jan 2016

There is a reason they have a Statute Of Limitations In the law.


And I suspect the libertarian Goldwater would have been supportive of glbtq rights as he was ahead of his times on the issue of them serving in our armed forces:

“You don’t need to be ‘straight’ to fight and die for your country.”

-Barry Goldwater-1993



Respectfully,
DSB
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
23. Goldwater was in favour in 1993, while Hillary was supporting DADT.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

Just goes to show how little support can be expected from her: only the amount the polls and focus groups tell her is necessary.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
38. Bill Clinton wanted to totally lift the ban...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jan 2016

Bill Clinton wanted to totally lift the ban but Senator Sam Nunn (D), Chairman of the Armed Forces Committee and Colin Powell, Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff derailed his efforts:


In Congress, Democratic Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia led the contingent that favored maintaining the absolute ban on gays. Reformers were led by Democratic Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts, who favored modification (but ultimately voted for the defense authorization bill with the gay ban language), and Barry Goldwater, a former Republican Senator and a retired Major General,[34] who argued on behalf of allowing service by open gays and lesbians. In a June 1993 Washington Post opinion piece, Goldwater wrote: "You don't have to be straight to shoot straight,"[35] after Congressional phone lines were flooded by organized anti-gay opposition, indicating substantial public opposition to Clinton's open service proposal.[clarification needed]

Congress rushed to enact the existing gay ban policy into federal law, outflanking Clinton's planned repeal effort. Clinton called for legislation to overturn the ban, but encountered intense opposition from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, members of Congress, and portions of the public. DADT emerged as a compromise policy.[36] Congress included text in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (passed in 1993) requiring the military to abide by regulations essentially identical to the 1982 absolute ban policy.[37] The Clinton Administration on December 21, 1993,[38] issued Defense Directive 1304.26, which directed that military applicants were not to be asked about their sexual orientation.[37] This is the policy now known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". The phrase was coined by Charles Moskos, a military sociologist.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_ask,_don%27t_tell






Respectfully,
DSB
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
44. Bill has openly said his wife has a problem with gays.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 03:45 AM
Jan 2016

So I can guess where she stood in 1993: on the side of the homophobes.

"Marriage is between one man and one woman" - heteronormative garbage from Hillary Clinton until 2013.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
46. If you believe Hillary Clinton is a homophobe there ...
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:57 AM
Jan 2016

If you believe Hillary Clinton is a homophobe there is nothing I can do to disabuse you of that notion.





Respectfully,
DSB

dsc

(52,160 posts)
45. and Bernie only wanted you to be married
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 07:39 AM
Jan 2016

after his state already did it without any help from him at all.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
47. Never try to convince somebody to believe something their whole world view is contingent...
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:03 AM
Jan 2016

Never try to convince somebody to believe something their whole world view is contingent on not believing.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
34. They're still bitter about the HRC endorsement, don't waste your time.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jan 2016

Its a long & lonely road with few friends walking by your side.
Thrre are many pics & videos online of Hillary & LGBTQ groups standing side by side supporting each other.
Google has a pretty good selection if anyone is really interested. Anyone can find more info if they want to.

Equal Rights are Human Rights
HRC

okasha

(11,573 posts)
12. the Human Rights Campaign
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jan 2016

is campIgnimg with her in Iowa.

Perhaps you should share your insights with them.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
16. The establishment doesn't take notice of my opinions - or of the rest of the 99%.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jan 2016

The HRC endorsement was not the result of a popular vote within the organisation / among its donors: it was just more status quo guys endorsing the status quo girl. And even then, they admitted that Sanders had the better record. But "this is how the game is played"

And this is how the game is going to be played: Sanders will change the rules. No more stacked decks, no more rigging, no more deals under the table.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
26. Oh, twaddle.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:35 PM
Jan 2016

"The establishment" is nothing but an anti-Clinton dog whistle. LGBT's were and in many ways still marginalized in American society. Don't try to straightsplain to us who our friends are or aren't. We know, far better than you do.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
32. Sweetie, I'm gay too, remember? Ask my man of you don't believe me.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jan 2016

We know exactly how hard life can be. That's why we support Sanders.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
48. I am not going to impugn anybody's integrity...
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:09 AM
Jan 2016

I am not going to impugn anybody's integrity but one would have to be incredibly naive to take anybody's assertion they are who they say they are on the internet at face value.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
14. And we know it can't be a back-room deal, because Gays.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jan 2016

Even though one could read it a lot like a business PR ("Sony to strike $50M deal with Ford&quot , we know it isn't. It's not like gays are just regular people but with different sexual orientations.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
18. Self-defeating behavior on their part.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary is not "naturally" tolerant of those who are different from herself.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
19. She opposed marriage equality for moral and religious reasons.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jan 2016

It's great she finally came around but she's no champion of lgbt rights.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
25. I think we both know
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jan 2016

she's not interested in any "rights" but those of her own privileged set.

She didn't spend her post-SOS years giving speeches to LGBT and other minority groups, now did she?

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
21. Rec ing for one reason. These are the Don't Rock the Boat Endorsements and they are a
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jan 2016

dime a dozen. This just enforces the income inequality gap. And gay? Who the hell cares about that?

I doubt that these influence the "Unwashed Masses" much. That's Bernie's territory and it used to be the Democratic territory...help the poor, health care, living minimum wage, equal pay for women. Pity.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
35. That's right. Who cares. Gay or straight or bi or trans or queer or lesbian...people finally
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jan 2016

don't much give a damn anymore. They are just people. Does that answer your silly question?

okasha

(11,573 posts)
37. It was your own silly question.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

And yeah, the bigots are still out there, including the Republicans in Congress and their sad excuses for presidential candidates. That's why we have to have a candidate who can take them down.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
40. First of all, I guess the question in question is "Who cares?" Second of all, there isn't a
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jan 2016

Democratic candidate at most any level who would not say the same.

So yes, again, what's the big deal. That's who we are. We don't do LGBTQ sorting. I don't care about the Republicans as they will take themselves down. I care, and I care deeply, about the Democrats. And there are differences between the two candidates, but LGBTQ is definitely not one of them.

Truly, if someone cares about sexual orientation, they don't belong in the Democratic Party. And Obama made that absolutely clear...I was so proud of his speech about that...it changed the entire national political scene.

And for the record, I'm hetero, but have family members who fall into a couple of those (other) categories and not one of us gives a damn...they're family.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
43. So by "cares about" you mean
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:19 PM
Jan 2016

"is a bigot with regard to," or "is homophobic." That's a different question entirely.

The answer is, a substantial number of Republicans and all the Republican presidential candidates. That"s why those of us who are LGBT need a candidate who can win and who has a proven record of commitment our causes. Sanders has a good voting record. Clinton has an equally good voting record as Senator and a much more extensive record of active advocacy, eg., intervening for African LGBT's targeted by viciously homophobic governments.

I agree that homophobes do not belong in the Democratic Party. There are, unfortunately, a number of homophobes posting regularly on DU. I also think it"s questionable whether they are Democrats.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
49. Absolutely...I should have taken more notice of your graphic. Sorry. Yes, I and my family,
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jan 2016

all of whom were raised Right Wing Conservative, are now full-on supporters of LGBT...My little sister and I by political leanings, my older two sisters each have a lesbian daughter. Go figure. They came along...kicking and screaming to be sure...but they made the journey because they love their daughters and I'm proud of them, too.

But that's the sad story of Republicans...it has to be one of their own to change their minds. That, to me, makes them kind of fickle. But like I said, for my two nieces, it made a difference.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
24. When will the Human Rights Campaign realize that
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

she is not on their side, and is only saying what's politically expedient anymore? Oh well. Just another hijacked cause I'm not giving money to. I will not sip tea with the enemy.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
27. Well, some are cynical but some are well-intenioned and uninformed.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jan 2016

However, it might wake them up a little if enough people withheld money temporarily. They need to open their eyes.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
39. Me too. For those today, tomorrow & those who have gone & only dreamed of such a Candidate like HRC
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jan 2016

We all move forward with President Hillary Clinton.
She forgets no one. For Instance:

Two-thirds of people who need treatment in the developing world are still not receiving it.

When the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) was founded in 2002, only 200,000 people were receiving treatment for HIV/AIDS in low and middle income countries, with medicines that cost over $10,000 per person per year. Over a decade later, more than eight million people are receiving treatment and CHAI has helped reduce the cost of medicines to around $100 to $200 per person per year in many countries. Countries have repeatedly proven that it is possible to rapidly scale up treatment services. For the first time, there is real promise that we can turn the tide against HIV/AIDS
.

- See more at: https://www.clintonfoundation.org/our-work/clinton-health-access-initiative/programs/hivaids#sthash.T805gI7u.dpuf
****************


Then-President Clinton and first lady Hillary Clinton visit the quilt on the Mall in 1992, when it was made up of 40,000 panels that covered the equivalent of 24 football fields.

After calls for help with the early HIV epidemic, Pres Reagan stood silent and distanced himself from the political stigma.
President Bill Clinton & First Lady Hillary stepped up & gave the horrific epidemic their Voices.

?s=6
http://www.wbur.org/npr/155868611/pieces-of-aids-quilt-blanket-nations-capital


There should be no question as to why the HRC & LGBTQ Groups across the nation stand in support of Hillary Clinton.
THANK YOU

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
41. All political endorsements are business transactions.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:10 PM
Jan 2016

In exchange for their public support, these politicians will receive access.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
42. Then in this case, its about time.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2016, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)

We all know what the Republicans wish is for LGBTQ.

And it is about time that Equal Rights are finally Human Rights, once & for all.

HRC 2016

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ten New York Gay Politici...