2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYou know why I will forever use the name Mrs. Greenspan instead of Andrea Mitchell?
because it takes too long to write the accurate description: Andrea Mitchell, wife of disgraced Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, the man who was at the center of the massive deregulation and bailouts of Wall Street.
So everything she reports on that deals with Wall Street power, corruption, money in politics, she should clearly state that she is representing her husband's interests, which she has shown over and over again that she does, in fact, serve as an agent of the .01%
elias49
(4,259 posts)She's an incompetent news-person. Dreadful really.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)so I'm not holding my breath. CNN, the most busted name in news.
elias49
(4,259 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)I don't watch much cable news anymore but I would rather watch any Fox fool rather than Wolfie.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)"Wolf Blitzer and CNN have officially gone under the bus!"
Or have they tried that one already?
rurallib
(62,900 posts)which seems to align quite well with Mrs. Greenspan I would say she will be employed for life, maybe beyond.
treestar
(82,383 posts)She has a separate career. She is not just a helpmeet to her husband.
raging moderate
(4,458 posts)Stockholm syndrome? Feller feelin'? Similarly biased, narrowminded upbringing? Or is it just that his financial interests coincide with her own so much?
treestar
(82,383 posts)the OP considers her to be representing her husband's interests in spite of her clearly having a career of her own.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Now I understand and respect those who have a problem with the "Mrs" term. However most of American society still would view distain for the term as political correctness run amuck. Therefore if someone uses "Mrs Greenspan", the benefits of clarifying her position as mouthpiece for the establishment, media conglomerates, oligarchy, etc are considerable.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Her treatment of Bernie has been atrocious. I was glad to see her being humiliated at the last debate.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Is that really so difficult?
mythology
(9,527 posts)Would you be okay with people referring to Chelsea Manning as Bradley Manning because they dislike transgender people?
It makes you look really petty to do this.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)However I am quite content with identifying the agents of our oppression, and their relationships, in this fashion.