Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:47 PM Jan 2016

GOLD STANDARD IOWA POLLSTER- Ann Selzer, calls it for Hillary!!! -HRC 45% SBS 42% MOM 3%

Hillary Clinton has kept a tight grip on her slim lead over Bernie Sanders in the waning hours leading into the Iowa caucuses, a new Iowa Poll shows.

Clinton is the top pick for 45 percent of likely Democratic caucusgoers, with Sanders at 42 percent, The Des Moines Register/Bloomberg Politics poll shows.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/01/30/clinton-keeps-slim-edge-over-sanders-latest-iowa-poll/79537020/









71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOLD STANDARD IOWA POLLSTER- Ann Selzer, calls it for Hillary!!! -HRC 45% SBS 42% MOM 3% (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 OP
That's not what I just saw: Bernie 51%, Hillary 39% <-- Is this not correct? n/t 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #1
Apparently not TSIAS Jan 2016 #2
When I first tuned into the live announcement those numbers were up on the screen 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #8
It was the cares about people like you number. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #16
Ahh. Helpful to know. Thank you. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #31
WORK HARDER BERNITES. CAN'T LET THE ESTABLISHMENT WIN! Fawke Em Jan 2016 #3
+10000 nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #9
Makes me sick. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #4
Ahhhhhh DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #10
You win - my son gets killed. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #61
I don't even know how to respond... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #62
Not killed by her, directly. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #64
You are about the fifth Sanders supporter to insult and patronize me today. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #70
YES! Iliyah Jan 2016 #5
YES!! workinclasszero Jan 2016 #6
That is a dead heat. All within MOE. retrowire Jan 2016 #7
I am too busy Twisting to respond. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #12
Turnout, turnout, turnout. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #63
WOOOHOOO!!! lunamagica Jan 2016 #11
We were told by the Sanders supporters Ann Selzer was the Babe Ruth of polling... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #13
So predictable and expected. Let's just enjoy this lunamagica Jan 2016 #17
I was told she was the Michael Jordan of polling and her word is golden. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #21
She didn't pick Bernie...so she's now more like Michael (mike) Lookinland from lunamagica Jan 2016 #30
They found a little room under the bus ismnotwasm Jan 2016 #46
"This board badly needs a dancing banana!" Number23 Jan 2016 #68
That's it! YAY! lunamagica Jan 2016 #69
Do you not understand what a Margin of Error is? DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #22
Do you not understand she's ahead in this golden poll FloridaBlues Jan 2016 #35
She's ahead by 3 and there's a MOE of 4 DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #37
Sir or madame, DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #44
There's really nothing to argue about DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #47
The margin of error is theoretical... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #49
"That's a tie..." brooklynite Jan 2016 #51
Here are the takeaways... brooklynite Jan 2016 #53
Statistically it's seen as a tie DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #56
No need to patronize me, sir or madame... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #40
It's actually 4 not 3 DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #43
You didn't read the entire article did you? mythology Jan 2016 #25
Bernie folks got some funny math skills workinclasszero Jan 2016 #27
No. Statistics tells us they are tied. You know that. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #36
Woohoo! ucrdem Jan 2016 #14
You mean, you're "a-samin'" coz she's the same ole, same ole. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #65
dd O'Malley's 3% to Sanders and you get bkkyosemite Jan 2016 #15
If that makes you feel better please run with it./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #18
I would not count on that at all. sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #34
And SENATOR Sanders isn't as much a part of the establishment elleng Jan 2016 #38
Congrats, Hillary supporters. Glad you finally got some good news. But we all know... dinkytron Jan 2016 #19
Living changes day by day, nothing stays the same Iliyah Jan 2016 #26
I'm not sure showing a lead within the MOE is "calling it for Hillary" DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #20
I agree. It is better to be ahead in the last five polls than behind. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #24
Well we won't have to wait long to find out DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #33
My wife was out canvassing our precinct here in Des Moines today... DaGimpster Jan 2016 #23
I think they are more concerned about their party. Iliyah Jan 2016 #28
The comment she got from the R's who were going to come caucus D was DaGimpster Jan 2016 #32
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jan 2016 #29
I can only imagine the nasty emails the pollster is getting KingFlorez Jan 2016 #39
I hope she doesn't have a Facebook page! Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #41
Swarming feel the Bern attack workinclasszero Jan 2016 #45
What's the margin of error? Most likely it's a virtual tie. Vinca Jan 2016 #42
4 Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #48
The 'gold standard'? Who told you to say that? elias49 Jan 2016 #50
This distinguished gentleman. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #54
Bernie Sanders is running an AWESOME campaign and the proof is in the poll LOL! nc4bo Jan 2016 #52
Dewey Beats Truman! NowSam Jan 2016 #55
Great numbers! Within the MOE and leaves MOM numbers. morningfog Jan 2016 #57
kick! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #58
Good enough for me! DCBob Jan 2016 #59
Propaganda. Cute. It's within the MOE cali Jan 2016 #60
Game over after Super Tuesday. On that, no polling authority needed oasis Jan 2016 #67
Ridiculous- how can you 'call it' before it's even begun? Eom Karma13612 Jan 2016 #71
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
8. When I first tuned into the live announcement those numbers were up on the screen
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:59 PM
Jan 2016

not sure what "Bernie 51%, Hillary 39%" was about ??

They were then talking about how to understand Bernie's huge margin,
then it suddenly changed to the other numbers. But it appears your
numbers are the over-all numbers, I just am still wondering what the
Bernie 51%, Hillary 39% was about.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
3. WORK HARDER BERNITES. CAN'T LET THE ESTABLISHMENT WIN!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jan 2016

Phone bank, ride-share, march.

We have to beat that awful candidate!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
10. Ahhhhhh
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:59 PM
Jan 2016

She'll be in jail and Trump will win. Ugh.

-Fawke Em



I haven't been so happy since my birthday...I am literally doing the:






Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
61. You win - my son gets killed.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:31 PM
Jan 2016

She'll send us to so many wars, he'll be drafted.

She really is a neocon war monger and I don't understand how any left-leaning person could ever vote for her.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
62. I don't even know how to respond...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jan 2016
You win - my son gets killed.
She'll send us to so many wars, he'll be drafted.

She really is a neocon war monger and I don't understand how any left-leaning person could ever vote for her.

-Fawke Em




I don't even know how to respond. Nobody's son is going to be drafted and killed by Hillary Clinton. Her foreign policy views are within the mainstream of Democratic thought.



Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
64. Not killed by her, directly.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:37 PM
Jan 2016

Geez, learn to read.

She's a WAR MONGER. She'll get us in so many wars, we'll need to draft. My son is nearly 17 now - and half Arabic. YOU figure it out.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
66. You are about the fifth Sanders supporter to insult and patronize me today.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:45 PM
Jan 2016
"....Geez, learn to read..."



You are about the fifth Sanders supporter to insult and patronize me today. No wonder the senator has asked his supporters to stop insulting people on the internet. It's a bad look, a very bad one...

My reply remains the same. I will be the bigger person, rise above the fray, and not respond in kind.


Respectfully,

DemiocratSinceBirth

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #66)

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
7. That is a dead heat. All within MOE.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jan 2016

Both of them gained 3 points and have stayed relative to one another.

Oy vey, this is going to be a fight.

Either way, Bernie has the majority of the youth vote and polls over 20 points higher than Hillary when people are asked "Does this candidate care about people like you?"

And the pundits said that that number is normally very telling when it comes to deciding the winner.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
13. We were told by the Sanders supporters Ann Selzer was the Babe Ruth of polling...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:10 PM
Jan 2016

Now we are being told that when Ann Says Hillary is ahead they are really tied, go figure!!!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
21. I was told she was the Michael Jordan of polling and her word is golden.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jan 2016

I was also told to ignore every other poll in the world because she was omniscient, omnipotent, and an oracle.

What has changed?

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
30. She didn't pick Bernie...so she's now more like Michael (mike) Lookinland from
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:24 PM
Jan 2016

The Brady Bunch...to short to shoot

The last few days have been just AWESOME for Hillary! Hopefully the trend will continue right through November!

Number23

(24,544 posts)
68. "This board badly needs a dancing banana!"
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 12:07 AM
Jan 2016

Will this little fella do?? He even has his own pom poms!

FloridaBlues

(4,008 posts)
35. Do you not understand she's ahead in this golden poll
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:27 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary by 5-6 points come Monday night.
Last 5 polls all had her up not one poll had bern up.
Sweet.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
37. She's ahead by 3 and there's a MOE of 4
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jan 2016

That's a tie, sport. But far be it from me to rain on your parade with statistical analysis and whatnot.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
44. Sir or madame,
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:38 PM
Jan 2016
She's ahead by 3 and there's a MOE of 4
That's a tie, sport. But far be it from me to rain on your parade with statistical analysis and whatnot


-Defense Attorney



Sir or madame, is there really a need for you to patronize your interlocutors on an anonymous message board?

And why is a man of your status arguing with us plebeians?

Thank you in advance.

DemocratSinceBirth
Proud Proletarian



P.S. She is ahead in the last five polls. If you use the Law OF Large Numbers, add em, and get the average, her lead is outside the margin of error.

That in and of itself is not dispositive of anything but the fact her lead is outside the margin of error.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
47. There's really nothing to argue about
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jan 2016

I didn't determine the margin of error for the poll, the pollster did. It is, as they say, what it is. If that is patronizing, I'm truly sorry that facts are patronizing. If you want to argue about how statistics work, you'll need to find someone else to engage in that debate. Just enjoy the good news.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
49. The margin of error is theoretical...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jan 2016

It doesn't mean that every time a candidate's lead is inside the margin of error he or she is not really leading...

Ceteris paribus, the margin of error is 4% and Candidate X is at 45% and Candidate Y is at 42% , you have to bet everything you own on the eventual winner, which candidate are you going to choose?

I will use The Law Of Large Numbers and aggregate the last five polls:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html

The sample size is 3,193 and Hillary Clinton's lead is 3.3% My back of the envelope margin of error calculation is 1.73%. That is outside the margin of error.

I regret that our tete-a-tete became rancorous. I am not not Nate Silver but I did do post grad work in Government and wouldn't have got that far without a rudimentary understanding of social science research.

brooklynite

(94,550 posts)
53. Here are the takeaways...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:05 PM
Jan 2016

No late surge for Sanders...

No bulk shift of the undecideds to Sanders...

It'll all boil down to turnout operations, and Clinton had refined hers since 2008

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
56. Statistically it's seen as a tie
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:09 PM
Jan 2016

Because you can't assume accuracy "within" the margin of error. Sure, she could be up by 7. But that is no more likely than Sanders being up by 1. As I said, you'd rather be up and than down, and it's good news for her. You just can't read more into it than is there.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
40. No need to patronize me, sir or madame...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:33 PM
Jan 2016
Do you not understand what a Margin of Error is?
It appears you do not



No need to patronize me, sir or madame.

The margin of error is 3% and the confidence interval is 95%. That means we can say with confidence that this poll is accurate 95% of the time and the results can vary by three percent.


DemocratSinceBirth
Proud Plebian



 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
43. It's actually 4 not 3
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:37 PM
Jan 2016

But since the MOE doesn't mean anything to you it doesn't really matter what it is. They "called it for Hillary" and you have won. Enjoy your weekend.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
25. You didn't read the entire article did you?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jan 2016

Here's a rather important part:

“It comes down to who can grind it out on the ground on Monday night,” said Axelrod, a senior political commentator for CNN and an architect of Barack Obama's successful 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns.

The results are within the poll’s margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

"Turnout is everything," Axelrod said. "If turnout is within a normal range, Hillary likely wins. If it goes higher, approaching 200,000, it will be a good night for Bernie."

This crowing that you're doing, is at best premature given that the very same article includes that it's within the margin of error. It's also premature in that any given poll has a confidence level and so in theory this could be one of the polls that takes an inaccurate sample of the overall electorate. 3% is a really small margin for error even if it is right and you would need to win over at least some of the O'Malley supporters if his numbers are accurate.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
36. No. Statistics tells us they are tied. You know that.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:28 PM
Jan 2016

I might not enjoy your company but I do believe you know how to read a poll.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
34. I would not count on that at all.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:26 PM
Jan 2016

O'Malley is more of an establishment guy.
We will see.

I am much more in shock that Trump has really
held up. Frightening, as far as I am concerned.

dinkytron

(568 posts)
19. Congrats, Hillary supporters. Glad you finally got some good news. But we all know...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:16 PM
Jan 2016

this whole Bernie thing cannot be put back in a jar. Let's see what happens.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
24. I agree. It is better to be ahead in the last five polls than behind.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:20 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html

If you use the Law Of Large Number and include all the samples in the survey Clinton's lead is statistically significant.




MATH

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
33. Well we won't have to wait long to find out
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:26 PM
Jan 2016

If your candidate wins on Monday you will be happy. If she loses your polls won't be much comfort. But enjoy the moment I guess.

DaGimpster

(130 posts)
23. My wife was out canvassing our precinct here in Des Moines today...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jan 2016

... and ran into a number of Republicans who support Sanders and will be switching affiliations at the door.

Either way, this is a major toss up right now with a lot of wildcards. Whomever wins, I feel it will be a slim margin. I'm glad the rubber is finally meeting the road and we, as a party, can start moving on.

DaGimpster

(130 posts)
32. The comment she got from the R's who were going to come caucus D was
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jan 2016

that their candidate didn't have a chance, so why bother.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
50. The 'gold standard'? Who told you to say that?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:00 PM
Jan 2016

You sure it's not the platinum standard. Will this be tomorrow's meme?
The "gold standard" in polling said:

The fact is, this primary is unlike any in modern American history.
Any pollster worth listening to would probably be unwise to go out on a limb, lest they lose their own personal shine!

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
52. Bernie Sanders is running an AWESOME campaign and the proof is in the poll LOL!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jan 2016

Ms. Landslide Inevitable is just plain notsomuch.

Good job Berners - now finish it and GOTV!!!

oasis

(49,383 posts)
67. Game over after Super Tuesday. On that, no polling authority needed
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jan 2016

Just drop into the DU Hillary Group for the dusk 'till dawn fandango.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»GOLD STANDARD IOWA POLLST...