Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:16 PM Jan 2016

538 just updated their Iowa prediction

Using Polls only for their prediction, Clinton stands at 74% likely to win.

Using their Polls Plus methodology (includes things like endorsements) her odds stand at 80%.

The blow out win Bernie needs to have any kind of chance in SC and the SEC primary is looking less and less likely.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
538 just updated their Iowa prediction (Original Post) Godhumor Jan 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2016 #1
The maths suggest it Godhumor Jan 2016 #4
But I thought Hillary was inevitable? - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #12
He doesn't need a blowout. Best would be a morningfog Jan 2016 #2
Hilll fans declare Bernie must have blowout win cali Jan 2016 #3
He has Old Codger Jan 2016 #5
Ha! I was reading your WTF post in GD when I got the notification you posted here Godhumor Jan 2016 #6
K&R! stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #7
I wished that 538 would not make predictions sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #8
Bernie needs to win by a large margin in IA to remain viable. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #9
LOL, OK, You sound like an expert. nt Logical Jan 2016 #13
No, he doesnt. Even should he lose by 2-3 points, Sanders KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #15
That myth only lived in the minds of republicans and lazy MsM ... not progressives uponit7771 Jan 2016 #17
"Just like 2008!" ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #10
Hilary is great at losing huge leads. Wonder why? nt Logical Jan 2016 #14
I can't think of anything more irrelevant than Iowa. BlueStreak Jan 2016 #11
Mm, I guess Camp Weathervane didn't get the memo. - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #18
K&R. Go Hillary! lunamagica Jan 2016 #16
Hmmmm, blowout? Kilgore Feb 2016 #19
how did the polls get it wrong? DrDan Feb 2016 #20
Don't think 0.4% qualifies as a "blowout" Kilgore Feb 2016 #21
which polls suggested a blowoout? DrDan Feb 2016 #22
Check out the PPP and Gravis final polls Kilgore Feb 2016 #23
were those the only two? - you said "all" of the polls DrDan Feb 2016 #24

Response to Godhumor (Original post)

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
4. The maths suggest it
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:22 PM
Jan 2016

Winning by a couple of delegates or losing by a couple of delegates won't exactly shift the massive hurdle Bernie has in more diverse states. In order to stay competitive in delegate count is to crush Iowa and NH both.

If he can't, he has a huge problem on his hands.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. He doesn't need a blowout. Best would be a
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:20 PM
Jan 2016

solid win. An near even split is all he really needs, at this point. Hillary's gonna get clobbered in NH. We'll go from there.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
5. He has
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:27 PM
Jan 2016

The fact that it is even close means he has Already defeated her, she and her fans just don't get it yet... I fit is a tie she loses, if it is even close she loses, she is a lost cause...

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
6. Ha! I was reading your WTF post in GD when I got the notification you posted here
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jan 2016

Have to love meaningless coincidences.

...

That's it. I have no point to this post.

Cheers!

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
8. I wished that 538 would not make predictions
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 09:40 PM
Jan 2016

about states with caucuses. I live in one, and
in 08 we argued for at least an hour back and
forth. Minds were changed right there.

It also depends on how many people think that
this particular election would be very important,
which shows in attendance.

Lastly,and sadly it depends on the weather. If bad
a lot of good intentions to participate go down the
drain.

If they predict a primary state, that is much more
reliable, but caucuses are very different, because
a lot of people know their neighbors.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
15. No, he doesnt. Even should he lose by 2-3 points, Sanders
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jan 2016

will have destroyed the myth of Hillary's inevitability, the sole remainder ng argument for her candidacy.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
11. I can't think of anything more irrelevant than Iowa.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:24 PM
Jan 2016

In contested years, Iowa is only about 50% right. That is predictive of nothing. They are a little better with Dems than the Republicans. They never get the Republicans right.

New Hampshire is only about 50% right also. A coin flip is just as predictive.

Why does anybody waste any time with these things? They mean nothing at all.

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
21. Don't think 0.4% qualifies as a "blowout"
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 09:46 AM
Feb 2016

And possibly not even a win since the results are not certified yet. Time will tell on this one.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
24. were those the only two? - you said "all" of the polls
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:31 PM
Feb 2016

PPP had her at 48% - pretty darned close - they overestimated MOM at 7%

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538 just updated their Io...