Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:35 AM Sep 2012

Gingrich: Obama only has to be ‘believable’ in debates to be re-elected

Sounds good to me!

Friday, September 28, 2012

Former Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is setting a low bar for President Barack Obama’s debate performance, saying that he only needs to be “believable” to be re-elected.

The former House Speaker on Friday told MSNBC that GOP hopeful Mitt Romney would need a “very strong debate” to even have a chance at the White House.

“They’re whistling past the graveyard,” Gingrich said of the Romney campaign. “I think that everybody I’ve talked to agrees that he’s had two and a half very tough weeks. I do agree, I think they started with the Clinton speech [at the Democratic Convention] and then they got compounded by all the other stuff that happened.”

“I do think in all fairness to Romney, when it got to be a crisis in Florida [during the Republican primaries], he was very good in the debates,” he explained. “That better be the Romney that goes to the debate with Barack Obama.”


VIDEO:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/09/28/gingrich-obama-only-has-to-be-believable-in-debates-to-be-re-elected/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gingrich: Obama only has to be ‘believable’ in debates to be re-elected (Original Post) TroyD Sep 2012 OP
Oh, Newt ... surrealAmerican Sep 2012 #1
Yeah Newt, Now get back to that right-wing social engineering Zambero Sep 2012 #2
Maybe because Romney can't be believed about anything he says..... Wounded Bear Sep 2012 #3
The debates at most quaker bill Sep 2012 #4
Same to you, Newt. You may have won, if only you were ... nt SDjack Sep 2012 #5
Newt was the only one in that debate more unlikeable than Romney smorkingapple Sep 2012 #6

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
1. Oh, Newt ...
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 08:23 AM
Sep 2012

... just because someone can best you in a debate does not mean they are "good in debates".

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
2. Yeah Newt, Now get back to that right-wing social engineering
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 08:37 AM
Sep 2012

that you lameneted in the primaries a few months back. After all, Todd Akin NEEDS you (to help him lose the election).

Wounded Bear

(58,654 posts)
3. Maybe because Romney can't be believed about anything he says.....
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 08:59 AM
Sep 2012

I think "believable" is RW dog-whistle talk for "truthful."

He's trying to say that President Obama will be "acting believable" when it is Romney who is acting.....about being human, mostly, I think.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
4. The debates at most
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 09:09 AM
Sep 2012

will cast the current trend in concrete. If BHO was well behind and stretching for a big score, Rmoney would have a shot at the debates. With BHO sitting on a big lead going in, Rmoney is the one needing to land some very big punches. He does not have them to throw. (he would need to be about something - have an actual ideology - to pull that off) BHO can just sit back, smile, and sound serious, reasonable, and composed. He is very, very, good at that.

smorkingapple

(827 posts)
6. Newt was the only one in that debate more unlikeable than Romney
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:53 AM
Sep 2012

That gave him room to smash Gingrich, which honestly wasn't that hard to do.

Romney cannot afford to come off as unlikeable in this debate when he's already trailing badly in that department. The town hall debate is a format he has to come off as relatable. I just don't see that happening.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Gingrich: Obama only has...