2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy winning Iowa is good news for Clinton
Last edited Wed Feb 3, 2016, 01:29 PM - Edit history (1)
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanders-could-win-iowa-and-new-hampshire-then-lose-everywhere-else/?w=575
On Edit: The above is a quote, the below is my own thoughts, in case this wasn't clear.
If Sanders can't win in Iowa, he may well win in New Hampshire and Vermont, but Clinton probably doesn't have to worry too much about too many other states.
It's too soon to be totally confident, but if you support Sanders then this is worse news than the margin of victory might make it look, and if - like me - you think that a Sanders victory would essentially hand the next presidency to the Republicans on a platter - then it's reassuring.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)flawed at best. It was posted yesterday and my comment still hasn't been addressed.
Sorry.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)We'll see how long that supposed firewall holds out for them. As far as 538 goes, they don't have a crystal ball, as we've seen before.
Cartoonist
(7,323 posts)And threw all journalistic integrity out the window.
and if - like me - you think that a Sanders victory would essentially hand the next presidency to the Republicans on a platter - then it's reassuring.
Thankfully, I'm not like him.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Only the part in the [quote] box is a quote, although I admit I should have made that clearer.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)They simply said Sanders was the underdog. He was given a 20% chance to win.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Because one looks foolish trying to spin a loss as a win. Much better to win and claim a win.
Thanks for the info.