Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:06 AM Feb 2016

After Crushing Defeat, DNC Quirk Still Gives Hillary More New Hampshire Delegates Than Sanders

Sanders won 60 percent of the vote, but thanks to the Democratic Party’s nominating system, he leaves the Granite State with at least 13 delegates while she leaves with at least 15 delegates.


According to the article, this is due to the DNC's superdelegate system. Six out of New Hampshire's eight superdelegates have pledged to Hillary. The other two are uncommitted as of now.

Disclaimer: A friend of mine mentioned this odd result to me earlier today. I found it hard to believe, so I did some quick research. The best explanation of it that I could find was at the site linked below. However, that site seems to be rather right-of-center.

I decided to post this anyway as a warning.

If the site is in error, please let me know and I'll delete this.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/10/hillary-earns-more-new-hampshire-delegates-than-sanders-after-loss/

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Crushing Defeat, DNC Quirk Still Gives Hillary More New Hampshire Delegates Than Sanders (Original Post) Shemp Howard Feb 2016 OP
Sanders is winning early states with the same group of people Clinton lost the primary with in 08... uponit7771 Feb 2016 #1
"STATES" itsrobert Feb 2016 #27
The Superdelegates don't count until the end. CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #31
True, I do think there's more benefit from a long dem fight than a short one... hmmmmm uponit7771 Feb 2016 #35
Yes, but Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #2
Registration is aquirk? 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #3
Reading comprehension is a good thing Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #6
I comprehended just fine thank you, and I still don't see people being able to register as a "quirk" 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #8
Which is not what I said Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #13
I don' t think you can claim " I don't mean to offend you" 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #17
OK Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #20
Then you come back with "I don't see why so many Bernie supporters 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #22
Based on my experience Nonhlanhla Feb 2016 #26
Reading comprehension is indeed a good thing 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #29
No, it's not exactly open. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #32
superdelegates shouldn't count for now Robbins Feb 2016 #4
They dont count now AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #12
Reinforces the rigged system meme NowSam Feb 2016 #5
The purpose of superdelegates is to block democracy. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #7
Hooray for Hillary!! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #9
Why are you cheering for this? PyaarRevolution Feb 2016 #19
Establishment candidate's authoritarian supporters hate democracy whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #21
Case in point. Puglover Feb 2016 #23
Because some of us want Secretary Clinton to win philosslayer Feb 2016 #24
Even if it means thwarting the will of the people? whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #25
crickets. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #33
Don't conflate pledged state delegates with Superdelegates. procon Feb 2016 #45
The Democratic Party set the rules for how delegates are apportioned. philosslayer Feb 2016 #46
Trust me, if they abuse the system for the establishment, we will whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #47
Superdelegates dont count until the convention AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #10
Overriding the democratic process and will of the people? Let them try. gyroscope Feb 2016 #11
Clinton has not locked down those votes Bad Thoughts Feb 2016 #14
we hope so-- otherwise, it's quite fucked up Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #38
"Each of the superdelegates' votes is now equivalent to about 10,000 Democratic voters." dogman Feb 2016 #15
Ah! The Tea Party / Grover Norquist-style Pledges. These "Loyalty Oaths" are NO different! TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #16
The super delegate system is blatantly undemocratic Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #18
Like I have said...if the super delegates take the election away from the real voters davidn3600 Feb 2016 #28
Our votes do matter but we have to keep crushing NowSam Feb 2016 #30
It is fair bravenak Feb 2016 #34
I doubt you would say that if they suddenly switched to supporting Sanders Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #39
Why? I do not love politicians bravenak Feb 2016 #40
what does that mean? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #41
People are too in love and unwilling to see whats going on bravenak Feb 2016 #44
hmmm... thanks for the explanation Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #50
ALL OF THEM bravenak Feb 2016 #52
so how did you end up in the Hillary camp? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #36
also reported in The Hill just now Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #37
This is CRITICAL. Needs Mainstream Media AND Grassroots coverage and OUTRAGE NAO Feb 2016 #42
This isn't exactly new stuff, yeah? procon Feb 2016 #48
Ignore the Super Delegates. The Corrupt Corporate Owned MSM uses them to PROP UP CLINTON. in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #43
Super delegates in actual Party language are called 'unpledged' delegates because they Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #49
Establishment Figures Want to Scare You with Superdelegates. Here's Why It's Bullshit... Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #51

uponit7771

(91,639 posts)
1. Sanders is winning early states with the same group of people Clinton lost the primary with in 08...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:08 AM
Feb 2016

... cause Obama played long ball with delegates.

Hillary lost NH with the same number she won with in 08 too, now there's no one to split the "hate hillary" vote...

We'll see, the SEC states is a tell tale.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
31. The Superdelegates don't count until the end.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:45 PM
Feb 2016

The Superdelegates always vote the way of the people. They throw their vote to the candidate who won.

No chance, they'd subvert the will of the people.

This conversation happened about the same time in 2008. Clinton kept trying to insist that she was winning, when she wasn't--because of the Superdelegates.

Ridiculous in 2008. Ridiculous now.

uponit7771

(91,639 posts)
35. True, I do think there's more benefit from a long dem fight than a short one... hmmmmm
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:47 PM
Feb 2016

... we need the back and forth.

hmmmm

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
2. Yes, but
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:09 AM
Feb 2016

another quirk gave Bernie a strong majority vote: and that is the fact that is is an open primary with same day registration.

I don't have a problem with that. My point is that both are particular "quirks" of the NH primary (and some other states) that influence the outcome.

Superdelegates are not written in stone, though. They only really come into play if there is a tie in the end.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
3. Registration is aquirk?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

In the same way that a Clinton loss by more than 20% and still gets more delegates? See to me that is just more of a rigged system.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
6. Reading comprehension is a good thing
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:25 AM
Feb 2016

My point is that NH is an OPEN primary, with SAME DAY registration, which means that it's much easier for people with less strong party ties to vote. Since Bernie is strong among independents, such a scenario favors him.

I don't have a problem with that. It's simply that there are quirks in every primary. And those quirks influence outcomes.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
8. I comprehended just fine thank you, and I still don't see people being able to register as a "quirk"
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:29 AM
Feb 2016

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
13. Which is not what I said
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:33 AM
Feb 2016

I did not describe registration as a quirk. I don't wish to offend you, but you did not in fact comprehend what I said, if that is what you get from it.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
17. I don' t think you can claim " I don't mean to offend you"
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:55 AM
Feb 2016

Then start your post with "reading comprehension is a good thing", followed by additional reading comprehension remarks, then continue to state that same day registration is a quirk like Hillary losing by more than 20% but gets more delegates is a quirk. I do comprehend what you are saying, I just believe it is bullshit much like your " I don't mean to offend you" is also bullshit.

Can you comprehend that?

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
20. OK
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:11 PM
Feb 2016

I should not have started with the reading comprehension thing, but it seemed to me that you were deliberately distorting my words, so I got annoyed. I don't see why so many Bernie supporters feel the need to aggressively attack even the most neutral remark.

And no, REGISTRATION is not a quirk and your efforts to make me sound like someone who would want to deny voters rights, are duly noted and rejected. My point is simply that the entire process is quirky. It's not a simple majority vote. Unrepresentative states get a head start; some states have caucuses; some states have open primaries where anyone can register to vote wherever they want, while other states have closed primaries where party loyalists tend to have the upper hand; and there are super delegates. All quirks on the system.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
22. Then you come back with "I don't see why so many Bernie supporters
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:28 PM
Feb 2016

Feel the need to aggressively attack...."

Really, I think we're done here.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
26. Based on my experience
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

This is not the first time where I would say something pretty neutral, and yet have someone twist or attack it for no good reason. It's getting tiresome.

Goodbye.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
29. Reading comprehension is indeed a good thing
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:42 PM
Feb 2016

I said we are done with this faux conversation. Comprehend yet?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
32. No, it's not exactly open.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:46 PM
Feb 2016

Republicans can not vote in the Democratic primary, and vice versa. Independents can choose a GOP ballot or a Democratic ballot. Basically, it's a closed primary that permits independents to participate.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
5. Reinforces the rigged system meme
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:23 AM
Feb 2016

in my opinion and will support the argument for electing the perceived anti establishment candidate. Bernie's fighting the rigged system. The slanted table. Overcoming this is the stuff of legend and a place will be reserved on Mt. Rushmore for Bernie Sanders.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
7. The purpose of superdelegates is to block democracy.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:27 AM
Feb 2016

No matter who wins the election I hope the Democrats will end the superdelegate system.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
19. Why are you cheering for this?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:02 PM
Feb 2016

It sends the message to those voters "Screw who most of you voted for, we're canceling that out with who we want".

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
24. Because some of us want Secretary Clinton to win
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:33 PM
Feb 2016

And, based on the number of delegates that came out of New Hampshire, she DID win.

procon

(15,805 posts)
45. Don't conflate pledged state delegates with Superdelegates.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:31 PM
Feb 2016

New Hampshire has 24 pledged delegates based on the popular vote. Superdelegates are chosen from the VIP party members and bigtime elected officials. They aren't awarded through the primary vote, but by the Democratic Party. New Hampshire has 8 with 6 deciding to go with Clinton. In our two party system, there is no separate callout for Independents, but the Superdelegates are free to switch their votes.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
46. The Democratic Party set the rules for how delegates are apportioned.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:34 PM
Feb 2016

If you have a problem with it, take it up with them.

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
11. Overriding the democratic process and will of the people? Let them try.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:32 AM
Feb 2016

how would the superdelegates explain it?

the rioting in the streets would dwarf the Civil Rights movement.

Bad Thoughts

(2,609 posts)
14. Clinton has not locked down those votes
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:34 AM
Feb 2016

The superdelegates vote at the convention. They make endorsements, which indicate how they would like to vote. However, they are mostly smart politicians that know how to take the pulse of the electorate.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
15. "Each of the superdelegates' votes is now equivalent to about 10,000 Democratic voters."
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:35 AM
Feb 2016

This according to Dan Abrams in Huffpost 2008. They enabled BHO to override HRC in 2008.

TheBlackAdder

(28,866 posts)
16. Ah! The Tea Party / Grover Norquist-style Pledges. These "Loyalty Oaths" are NO different!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:46 AM
Feb 2016

.


Make politicians beholden to candidates, against popular support, questioning political legitimacy!


See, the DNC and the RNC aren't that dissimilar after all!


.

Eric J in MN

(35,620 posts)
18. The super delegate system is blatantly undemocratic
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:59 AM
Feb 2016

...and should be removed from the Democratic Party starting in four years.

Super delegates include FORMER DNC Chairs. They may be retired from every job, but they're royalty when it comes to picking the Democratic nominee. This nation was founded on a rejection of royalty.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
28. Like I have said...if the super delegates take the election away from the real voters
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:41 PM
Feb 2016

I will leave the party. I'm done. I will absolutely under no circumstances support an oligarchy.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
30. Our votes do matter but we have to keep crushing
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016

I believe the system is highly corrupt and morally bankrupt and this ploy of counting the super delegates now is meant to suppress turn out because what they are saying, in my opinion, is that our votes don't matter. We can crush and win in a landslide and the establishment will still anoint Hillary.

We must continue top get out the vote in record numbers and crush the establishment candidate. Then the super delegates will go with the will of the people or risk destroying the party.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
44. People are too in love and unwilling to see whats going on
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:03 PM
Feb 2016

Nothing gets through congress
It does not matter that much
I align withJill Stein
She is way to my right
Why would I care?

They are just politicians who have similar ideas to me
I would not care who got the superdelegates just like the endorsements dont jazz me up
Unless malcolmx's ghost is running, meh

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
52. ALL OF THEM
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 06:38 PM
Feb 2016

Every time I tke that stupid test. My position is way to the left of the candidates. Never fails. Thats why I know nobody is ever going to be pushing the stuff I want. They are too far right. Even Bernie, he's to the right of stein really, and I'm to the left of her.

Response to Shemp Howard (Original post)

NAO

(3,425 posts)
42. This is CRITICAL. Needs Mainstream Media AND Grassroots coverage and OUTRAGE
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:58 PM
Feb 2016

What incredible BS that Bernie could win the largest landslide in NH primary history, and yet still receive fewer delegates!

This has to be:

1. EXPOSED

2. STOPPED

If Bernie wins the primary popular vote and Clinton gets the nomination, it will infuriate Bernie supporters and rip the party apart, handing the GE victory to the Republican.

Any ideas how we can bring this issue to the forefront?

Bernie needs to talk about this problem NOW rather than merely basking in a popular vote landslide which could be effectively meaningless because of the "Super Delegate" system.

procon

(15,805 posts)
48. This isn't exactly new stuff, yeah?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:42 PM
Feb 2016

Do you know how long the current system has been effect? You want "EXPOSED"? Google wiki and at least get some background information.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
43. Ignore the Super Delegates. The Corrupt Corporate Owned MSM uses them to PROP UP CLINTON.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:02 PM
Feb 2016

They don't mean jack crap until the convention and even then, if Bernie has swept the nation and has won the popular vote, WE THE PEOPLE, the Super Delegates will switch to Bernie.

If Bernie sweeps the nation like I think he will, Super Delegates can and DO, switch their endorsements BEFORE the convention.

IGNORE SUPER DELEGATES. Clinton did the same thing in 2008....she's not sitting in the Whute House.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
49. Super delegates in actual Party language are called 'unpledged' delegates because they
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:09 PM
Feb 2016

can't pledge and are not counted until they vote. So this thinking uses very murky language. Their endorsements are in no way binding to them, the opposite in fact.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»After Crushing Defeat, DN...