"Sanders is 'astounded' by Clinton hires"
= new reply since forum marked as read
NOT MY SIDE!
Proud it is not my side.
Thank you Betty. 
How self-serving. But typical. 
I also question yours if you think that the Republicans aren't going to attack Democrats mercilessly, so by all means, let's pick the lambs who are the least effective.
Clinton explained her interest in Kissinger in a few short sentences. You do realize that few people have the luxury of hating on their predecessors in any job or in any type of professional setting. Only truly out of touch or unaccountable people can diss former employers or acquaintances and most people know that and understand that. I doubt you are teaching your boys to curse and spit on people with whom they disagree. Lots of people here encourage that kind of behavior against your political enemies, but that's not reality and most people know that. It's a luxury few people could afford to do, but it sure sounds good on the internet.
And your response is full of morality, which is another hallmark of the Sanders responses. lol.
That's what I meant about Sanders mostly using BenieFan INTERNET-fueled talking points. The man is 92-YEARS-OLD. She explained why she was interested in his viewpoints.
Most people aren't going to care about these INTERNET flame wars.
And yet more superiority in your post, although we hear these are the "issues". LOL,
He said that on This Week with George Stephanopolous a couple weeks ago.
SHAMEFUL! Spread the word....
with George Stephanopolous and he named the person and I even looked it up. You are free to use your Google to look it up.
Face it, your only responses to me are that I should be ashamed. Morality and shame, lol, that's all these responses are . Oh, and I must be "paid".
I didn't say positive things about Brock or Kissinger. I said these are INTERNET-fueled talking points, which they are. Most of the talking points about this lead back to internet flame wars. That pretty much says it all.
It think it was also posted here. You can find it with a couple searches. What's funny is that if I posted it, you would just continue in this tactic of insulting me and insisting you are superior. And this is passed off as a discussion of "issues."
I have to now just giggle at your self-reverence. Enjoy yourself. 
If you can't find it with all I gave you, you obviously have other motives for continuing to badger me. This is now completely off topic, but it does illustrate that these things are just internet flame wars. That was my initial point.
Oh, and I bet when you find him, you'll come up with all kinds of things that we're all supposed to take "in context" for how Bernie intends the information from this source. But if Hillary uses a source, it's just a matter of Good vs. Evil. She was in a picture with so-and-so.....Evil! 
That's what I mean that this is all internet flame wars. Considering that Sanders has said he would consult with a former Reagan advisor, it's OBVIOUS that people are aware that some understanding of prior administrations and the thought processes of their decision making are necessary to fully understand America's position at that time, wrong or not.
But do continue to tell me how much better you are and how unworthy I am. LOL.
Google it. There are threads here also about Sanders foreign policy advisors. If I told you to put up or shut up, my post would be hidden. Hmmm. It's hard to believe you are a Sanders supporter and don't know his foreign policy "advisors".
C'mon. Bernie Sanders fans should know what he has said about his foreign policy advisors. There were even threads here about. it.
Like I care what you think about my "ideas". It's obvious that this is about your version of Good vs. Evil, with everything I say being "evil." It's just silly to spend more time, gotta go. 
with me being evil, of course, because I can see why current politicians would want to understand the decision making of their predecessors.
There is nothing to be learned except that you searched on the internet for edited clips that fit your needs.
Clinton was clear in a few sentences why she was interested in Kissinger's viewpoints. Even Sanders has said he would consult with a Reagan foreign policy advisor, so obviously there is a need to have a nuanced understanding of others' views.
Like I said, this is mostly material for internet flame warriors. Most people don't have the luxury of behaving like internet flame warriors in real life, especially if they have a position of standing in the world. That is a position for people who are unaccountable and... anonymous.
Now you are saying they are heroes. That's not what was said, but it does sound good on the internet for the internet flame wars. Which was my original point.
Sniffle. 
and Brock's history as a "former" right-wing scumbag and enemy of the left is "conspiracy theory"
it gets them riled up. Most people in real life aren't going to hunt down 40 year old clips to post on the internet, and they don't care who wins internet fights. That's why I said it's surprising his message is targeted mostly to the internet mongers. Most of these Googled "issues" lead back to internet fights.
LMAO.
Bored with the Good vs. Evil theater, but good show.
DUzy!
"...whining about Brock"?!?
Are YOU serious?!?
Wow. As I recall, David Brock was the cretin who smeared Anita Hill and helped install one of the WORST SCOTUS Justices ever in our history!
I'm with Bernie on this one, too. But, you keep applauding Hi11ary's team. I think it says a lot about HER and a lot about her supporters that now, when Brock is on her team, he's one of the good guys.
That much is clear by your post.
If you understood ethos, you would see that your post makes no sense. In fact, right now this is unfolding, but you still haven't connected the dots. The more they attack Bernie using underhanded methods like the kind Brock comes up with, the stronger it makes Bernie.
Bernie doesn't understand her choices, and the reason he says he doesn't understand them is that Bernie is operating from ethos.
The same thing will happen with the Republicans.
You and most of the rest of us have never seen what happens when there is a political candidate whose basis is ethos. That is because our system weeds them out. Bernie is one of very few people who could both navigate the system and maintain his own integrity.
I personally know only one person who has maintained a long-time career in business operating from ethos. It is formidable, and given what I see of the Clinton and the republican candidates, they will be unable to overcome it.
Cher
This is an article of comments made up from around the web:
Folks who have identified as Republicans for years have made the switch, citing Bernie’s honesty, integrity, and unwavering stance on issues.
See: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511237382
Read more at the link cited in the OP. This will give a bit of an understanding on how ethos works and why people like Clinton or any of the Republicans will be unable to overcome it.
Cher
been using Karl Rovian tactics...I can see you DEFEND the use of those tactics, counting on the fact that the only good guy (your Hillary is NOT A GOODX PERSON) while you think you'll get away with bullshit is quite telling. In fact, it exposes as the mentality among Hillary supporters.
You don't seem to give a shit about the electorate or the issues. The only thing you think that will work for you is parroting GOP and start mudslining as if you were still in grade school or kindergarten.
But Bernie won't take the bait. Even though many of you Hillary supporters have wet dreams about him taking your bait.
But take if from someone who's been around the block a few times.
Hillary is a whiner and not a fighter. She stands 11 hours against republicans, and feels as attacking money in politics, legalized bribery is an "artful smear" against her. But then again, we know the lack of masculinity among repubicans, in which they are trying to over compensate.
She is an egomaniac and a compulsive liar who uses the same tactics as her FELLOW republicans have been using since Reagan.
Sorry. It won't work anymore Clinton and OTHER republicans!
The days of your smear machine are over. And I can literally smell the fear from Hillary and GOP!
We live in the internet age, and your lies and destortions will quickly be shut down.
We came, we bombed, they drowned... HAHAHAHAHAH
You can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep. Birds of a feather flock together.
