2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton confronts Nevada blowback
Her campaign's attempt to downgrade expectations backfires in the pivotal caucus state.
By Annie Karni
02/15/16 05:20 AM EST
With five days to go until the Nevada caucuses -- once viewed as Hillary Clintons Western firewall -- Sen. Harry Reid and his allies are incensed at the wounded Democratic frontrunner.
The reason: The Clinton campaigns attempt to downgrade expectations there by whitewashing the diverse state.
The campaigns recent assertion that Nevada is still a state that is 80 percent white voters in other words, a state that looks alot like Bernie Sanders' base -- is simply wrong, Reid allies claim. But more galling than that, they say, it undermines the entire rationale for the caucuses existence -- the state was only pushed to the front of the election calendar eight years ago because Reid lobbied for better demographic representation than the overwhelmingly white early-voting states like Iowa and New Hampshire.
Harry Reid pushed hard to move Nevada near the front of the primary calendar precisely because of its diversity, a source close to the Senate minority leader said last week after the Clinton team pushed the white Nevada narrative in a series of conferences calls to donors and lawmakers on the Hill, as well as in television interviews (Clinton operatives have since appeared to back off that argument).
Nevada is the early state that is truly representative of America, and were proud of that fact, the source added. It sounds like the Clinton team is worried about another embarrassing result.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-hillary-nevada-blowback-219295#ixzz40FSnEA00
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)When she not doing as well as expected by her and to just have a token primary.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)It'll be obvious it's not just white voters voting for Sanders. Another meme bites the dust!
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)The "red-baiting" worked so well, perhaps they will try that crap again.
"Cannot be elected?" Not when more people voted for Bernie in NH than any other candidate in history.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)This is her last time, I do worry how far they'll go.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Holding office is merely a means of enriching themselves.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Must not have been very good.
.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)The irony, Brock correcting anything.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)not all Jews will vote for Bernie nor all Hispanics..it goes on and on.
What is pathetic to me is this idea that not enough from diverse groups will
vote for him, and that remains to be seen..Clinton will continue to
make the case and with some black leaders support that he should
not be trusted with a way forward.
I am politically active in my state, I don't hear this crap about online supporters
turn them against him, I do hear, can he win? Against the Clinton machine and DNC..that is a
damn fair question.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)since that gives them no reason not to vote their conscience in the primary.
The one that matters is whether people think he can beat the Republican nominee.
I think he has a better shot at that than Hillary does, hard to know for certain though.
Anyway that's the electability issue that could reasonably be used as an excuse to not vote for him in the primary. Ability to beat the Clinton machine doesn't matter, if you vote for him in the primary and she beats him, you still have her in the general, nothing lost by voting for Bernie.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,227 posts).
Wait for it... Wait for it...
.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)wrestling with the raw and painful realization that TRUTH is one HELL of an unrelenting opponent.
global1
(25,285 posts)campaign. I'm wondering how many Senators and Congressmen/women are beginning to second guess their endorsement?
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Bernie is talking to Clinton endorsers and trying to convince them to change their endorsements. He started this phase already, so Clinton has nothing left to offer to benefit other Democrats. We all know that Clinton will just drag the elected officials to their doom in the GE. Bernie stands to offer excellent chance of retaking the Senate, and perhaps the House if the right seeds are planted. As in Bernie's Army. As in Tim Casnova.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)You hafta wonder how many of them are thinking: Whoa! What have I signed on for???
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)They are her firewall after all.
She's also conceding the white Democratic vote, which is incredibly revealing.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,453 posts)Thanks for the thread, Jefferson.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Why do they think he needs to win the majority of the black American voter in SC
or its a blow out? I'm like huh?
If we had a race where there were 3 or 4 candidates, we're suppose
to believe she would garner most?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)nxylas
(6,440 posts)(Look it up.)
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The drill was wrapped up hard enough I couldn't get my finger off the trigger and it threw paint everywhere, there was about a gallon in the bottom of the bucket when I finally got it stopped.
That's like the Clinton campaign, it's wrapped up, the trigger is stuck on and stuff is flying everywhere.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)reply.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)Or was yours a metaphor
Donkees
(31,478 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)on race.
Hillary should stop using race as a wedge issue. It really doesn't help her whe she dismisses a whole segment if the population for being in one racial group.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)someone who can do something about it.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)handling any state. Discuss the issues. Talk to all people as you would any people and let the voter decide. No one should be treated as if they owe you a vote. There should be no firewalls.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)of them anything. I agree.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)With that said, it's not really a bad strategy to work as if you are facing impossible demographics. Too many times candidates think they are guaranteed to win, don't put in the work and then end up losing. If Clinton did the opposite, she'd be accused of taken things for granted. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,768 posts)27+% Hispanic and 9% African American in 2012
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Hispanic_and_Latino_population
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_African-American_population
That's not going to fly!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...so their representation % in the Democratic caucus is much higher. Combined, nearly 50% as a guess. It's a fair test of minority support, although caucuses are messy and unpredictable.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Heckuva job, Hillary!
DUbeornot2be
(367 posts)...and that it begins with a power player like Harry Reid is a very bad sign for the annointed one...
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)DUbeornot2be
(367 posts)...her majesty loses South Carolina it will be because the gop has been so successful at disenfranchising her firewall, right?!
Her arrogance and willingness to use people for her own gain is beyond belief!
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)possibility.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)That will require picking up additional AA support, but that will crack the firewall. The good news is that he gets strong support from youth, including Black youth, and it appears they will enthusiastically turn out to vote for him.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)corruption and policies both domestic and foreign and how they sustain racism.
It goes far beyond a job and college, I am not altogether confident enough Americans
understand that linkage.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)has yet to actually vote?
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Are you still doing those? I love them!
.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I also think they relied too heavily on Democrats not being aware of the issues
across all demographics, and now they have any opportunity to view, compare
and contrast more in depth.
Although their politics may seem similar enough to the establishment, her campaign
has overlooked significant distinctions between them.
Her ties with WS, her choices about military interventions, her ratings on
honesty are so low, it even shocked me...and that was among Democrats
and Independents.
In short, the DNC and the Clinton machine live in a bubble.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)Seems so.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)I wonder why?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Isnt that one of her constituencies?