2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumQuestions about the NV returns as shown on MSNBC:
(Not disputing HRC's apparent narrow win, just want clarification on these points)
1)Are those numbers they're showing below the percentages raw votes or pledged state convention delegates?
2)If it us just pledged state convention delegates, will they ever release the raw vote totals or will they get all Iowa about it?
3)Why do they seem to have stopped counting at 83% of the vote total? Would it really be that difficult to release the rest of the results?
HillDawg
(198 posts)Just give it time. It's at 84% now. Actually, as more vote have come out, here lead has increased. Shes up 5% now.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I'm looking at KOLO News in NV (ABC affiliate). They seem to be updating frequently.
http://www.kolotv.com/elections
HillDawg
(198 posts)livetohike
(22,163 posts)were at the caucus.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Secrecy on that was unjustified in Iowa and would be unjustified in NV as well.
Iol59
(25 posts)After all is said and done There are 12,000 total delegates. That's what Steve Kornacki said.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...are precinct delegates.
These are the delegates that are awarded in each precinct.
They are not a percentage of the raw vote (popular vote). The percentages are the percentage of precinct delegates that each candidate won in those precincts tonight.
According to KOLO News (with 85 percent reporting)
Delegates won, thus far are: Clinton 5429, Sanders 4913. That gives Clinton 52 percent; Sanders 47.
Caucuses never release raw vote totals or the popular vote. That would turn the caucus into a primary vote.
It will be interesting to see what the delegate breakdown is. Obama lost by 6 percent in 2008 and ended up earning one more delegate than Clinton.
LexVegas
(6,094 posts)ebayfool
(3,411 posts)but if that's what floats your boat, have at it.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)You know you candidate had nothing to celebrate in Iowa, though.