Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 08:06 AM Feb 2012

Romney signs anti-porn pledge, ignores demand to return contribution from "hardcore" pornographer

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/02/15/426391/romney-anti-porn-pledge-ignores-contribution-pornographer/



Last month, three of the four current Republican presidential contenders responded to a survey from the group Morality in Media’s War on Illegal Pornography campaign. They all agreed to get aggressive with violators of federal obscenity laws if elected president. Mitt Romney specifically said he would be for “strict enforcement of our nation’s obscenity laws, as well as the promotion of parental software controls that guard our children from Internet pornography.”

But campaign filings show that, last September, Romney accepted the maximum campaign contribution of $2,500 from Daniel Staton, the chairman of Friend Finder Networks Inc. that owns —among several other properties — Penthouse, BDSM sites like Bondage.com and BDSM.com, and LikeMyNudePhoto.com. Romney also accepted $2,000 from Staton and an additional $2,300 from Friend Finder Network CEO Marc Bell during his failed 2008 presidential campaign.




What a greedy dumb ass. That's pocket change to Romney, yet he's too greedy to return it, thereby exposing his own hypocrisy.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney signs anti-porn pledge, ignores demand to return contribution from "hardcore" pornographer (Original Post) Scuba Feb 2012 OP
Professional politicians like to have it both ways liberal N proud Feb 2012 #1
You have to have it both ways izquierdista Feb 2012 #5
Standard Hypocrisy on the part of many, however Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #2
I wonder... RitchieRich Feb 2012 #3
Willard is agaimst porno unless he can put the proceeds in his pocket Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #4
 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
5. You have to have it both ways
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 11:29 AM
Feb 2012

If porn wasn't strictly controlled and filtered and blocked, then it wouldn't be as exciting. And if it was everywhere, people wouldn't need to pay money for it. And then there wouldn't be a big pile of money to donate to a politician to control it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney signs anti-porn pl...