2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMy question to Clinton supporters
You seem giddy because of the recent poll more women support Clinton than Sanders.
Is it more important to you to see the first woman President or is it more important to you
to have a President that is not owned by banks and Wall Street?
Thanks
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)All politicians are corrupt.
All criticism of Clinton is a lie and right-wing smear.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)All politicians are corrupt so calling Clinton corrupt doesn't bother me.
And/or
DU has become a right-wing smear website full of Bernie supporters parroting right-wing conspiracy theories.
Oh and some version of Clinton is OJ; yeah he's covered in blood and there's AMPLE evidence he killed two people, but a court found him innocent so technically he's innocent.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Yeah... No.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)I can show you multiple examples if you'd like.
I can also show you a Clinton supporter saying that the ENTIRE reason they were voting for Clinton was because she had more AA staffers than Sanders.
That was it.
No other reason.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Just because one person on an anonymous discussion board says it doesn't mean it's a fact/true.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)This is not all just one person.
I've been told the first two things over and over and over.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)What's that got to do with the OP?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Just responding to you, we could both show each other posts that are OTT, or out of line.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)All honest observers knew that, a poll I never saw just one of many with the same message.
But she's far stronger than just that: Democrats support Hillary in very high numbers. She is well liked and well respected in our party.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)General Election will tell the tale ... IF Clinton Incorporated is the nominee... It will not be pretty....
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The founders of Crowdpac say that combining these factors provides a more accurate picture of a candidates true political philosophy, especially when some potential candidates (such as Carly Fiorina and Ben Carson) never have held office and thus have no voting record to judge."
I was surprised to see analysis of their records put Hillary slightly left of Martin O'Malley, but I'm guessing the realities of being a governor checked by a state legislature might account for that. Or maybe she is just a bit left in ideology.
(BTW, Marco Rubio? He moves wherever the ladder reaches highest, and most observers consider him in this period way over by Cruz. If he wants the Kochtopus to choose him for president, he'll stay there. And he really, really does.
Notice also, the Democratic ticket has NO candidate as extreme as the worst on the right.)
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Threads like this never go very well. But it's still entertaining to watch.
togetherforever
(71 posts)Even Clinton has mentioned the fact she would be the first woman President .
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)That's an actual fact... Should she be elected she would be the first woman. Are you debating that?
togetherforever
(71 posts)who would you support?
Just indulge me for a second..
If Clinton was a man , Walmart ties , Big bank ties , SOS that laughed about bombing and killing people.
Kissinger as his mentor , Super Pacs funded by big banks and Wall street types all supporting him.
THEN we would have Sanders as he is now.
Who would you support as our next President ?????
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm not anti-Bernie I've actually voted for him and helped him get elected to his Senate seat.
Again my vote, my choice.
togetherforever
(71 posts)Her track record would make a Republican proud
Why then would Clinton supporters vote for her over Bernie?
First woman President running as a democrat ???
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Have at it.
I'm voting for Clinton, I support Clinton and it's got pretty much nothing to do with her equipment down there.
But clearly according to you I don't support Democratic values and I can't see past her sex.
I'm so over people telling me how I should think and how I'm not a democrat because of who I want to vote for. The new DU...
Keep on keeping on.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)I voted for her and so did my husband....he doesn't have girly bits....I and I can actually think for myself....image that.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It's in invalid question as it contains an inherent yet unsupported premise; i.e., a logical fallacy known as 'the complex question.'
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I support my candidate for many reasons.
My vote my choice, belittling others is lame.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Also, Obama won because black people vote based on color. Only white dudes vote with their brains.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...but I think Clinton gets many votes because of her name and gender. It's evident in the cries of sexism against her. It's evident in the lack of her policies brought up by her supporters here.
It's not a good sign for November. People will see through it because there's nothing really to look at.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Good gawd!
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...but thanks for putting words in my post?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...she has support from all over the spectrum. Doesn't matter if it's a man, woman, LGBT, AA, Latino, whatever.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Keep up the insults bros.
Its gonna pay off for you BIGTIME starting tomorrow!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Edit your post before you get a hide, it's not worth it.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)Do you not think Clinton gets many votes because of her name and gender? People get excited about having "The First (BLANK) President". They just do! It doesn't make her the best choice, though...
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)If that *IS* the reason they vote so be it, we have a turnout problem telling people they aren't voting for the "right" reasons is not going to help that.
It's not your job to decide what is or is not the right reason for someone to vote for someone else.
I wish people would stop.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...people can vote however they want, and I can have an opinion about it. Gender and name are not good reasons to vote for someone for president. If you're not voting for her for either of those reasons, I think you're alright, not that it means anything.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Or you are mindlessly voting for your gender or race, is that your philosophy?
Does that about cover it?
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...gender and name are not good reasons to vote for someone for president. If you have reasons other than that, policy wise, great! I just think a large portion of her support, from all over the spectrum, don't have that. You may not be one of those people and that's fine.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Another premise based wholly on a a logical fallacy. Your being the ever popular, 'post hoc ergo prompter hoc; argument. "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X."
GDP is certainly not the home of rational thought.
livetohike
(22,177 posts)Fizzle. That's the sound of the Sanders campaign berning out. Get used to saying Madam President 😊.
I'm voting for the most qualified candidate.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)LexVegas
(6,128 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Since 69% of Americans want to see a woman president in their lifetime, older voters are voting for Hillary. Don't believe it? Bernie isn't winning that demo.
riversedge
(70,633 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Nor is even a river in Egypt... merely a bumper sticker used in place of rational responses.
Gamecock Lefty
(702 posts)that is was my political party that gave us the first African-American president. But I didnt vote for Obama because he was black.
Im going to equally as proud when my party elects the first woman president, but Im not voting for Hillary because she is a woman.
Im an older white guy, so youd think Id go with the old guy right? Not!
Go get em, Hillary!
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)This whole OP is alert bait don't give in.
BostonBob
(18 posts)Must vote the way old white men at Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Comcast MSNBC, and all those old white men at the top of the war and weapons industry want. Then the fleecing can continue while people are celebrating their "empowerment" as multinational corporate tyranny continues. Bernie has done well in states that have actually voted. If he doesn't prevail against the tidal wave of corrupt money and corporate media propaganda, all of our demographic tribes are screwed except for the tribe of the top 1%.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)From the East Coast to cali.
Together, Forever.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Tarc
(10,479 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Both those issues are important, but I think policy is more important than the sex of the person advancing it. But I also think in the end both will be able to get about the same amount of stuff done with regards to banks and Wall Street. In my opinion, of course.
I do, however, look forward to FINALLY having a woman as President.
togetherforever
(71 posts)"I do, however, look forward to FINALLY having a woman as President"
But does this trump (pardon the pun) having another man President that actually
has a track record of fighting for the poor and middle class.
A person who hasn't been shown to be a liar and shift with how the political winds happen to blow?
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Welcome and please, enjoy it while you're here. There are pastries and coffee in the Lounge.
hamsterjill
(15,229 posts)I simply believe (and contrary to all of the fuss and muss on DU, it is my RIGHT to believe) that Hillary is the better of the two candidates.
I am not "giddy" in any sense. People, both men and women, are free to choose the nominee that they deem best. I insist on that right for myself. I have tried hard not to involve myself in all of the mud slinging on DU, and none of the mudslinging that I've read on DU has had an impact on my choice.
May the best candidate win. And when that candidate is chosen, I, for one, expect all Democrats to fall in line and support that candidate. Anything less is immature and childish. Anything less is just going to put a Republican in the office of the Presidency and then the country will go back to being as shitty as it was when Bush (either one) was in office.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Nice try though!