Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA question:If the head of the EPA wants to clamp down on greenhouse emissions and Goldman calls too
which one would your preferred candidate for President be more likely to go along with?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 997 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A question:If the head of the EPA wants to clamp down on greenhouse emissions and Goldman calls too (Original Post)
libtodeath
Feb 2016
OP
The key to clamping down on greenhouse gas emissions lies in Congress, not the White House.
Buzz Clik
Feb 2016
#2
The EPA can regulate and Goldman can have financial interests in fossil fuel companies.
libtodeath
Feb 2016
#3
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)1. Goldman says one thing publicly
while doing something else secretly, so what GS says in not a reliable indicator of what they really want. The reliable indicator is how much money can GS make on a situation.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)2. The key to clamping down on greenhouse gas emissions lies in Congress, not the White House.
Both Dems are just fine on their environmental stance.
And, other than some bursts of methane in their flatulence, Goldman ain't much of a greenhouse gas emitter.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)3. The EPA can regulate and Goldman can have financial interests in fossil fuel companies.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)4. And? You think Sanders is going to make either Goldman or the fossil fuel companies disappear?
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)5. Was that what I said?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)6. No, that strawman...
was his gift to you. Generous, isn't he?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)9. Here's my gift to you:
Early voting for Super Tuesday. Guess who I voted for?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)7. I have no idea what you point is. However, ...
... I also don't think I care.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)10. Thanks for stopping by!
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)11. My pleasure.