Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:15 AM Mar 2016

Making lemonade from lemons

The posts from Clinton supporters are different than the posts I saw yesterday. Going into Super Tuesday, it was all over for Bernie Sanders. Nothing left to do but not get hurt by the flying champagne corks at Clinton victory parties. There are still some proclamations of a huge victory, of course, and Sanders obituaries, but the tone is a little more muted around here. There is some reaching, the best of which I thought was a demand that Elizabeth Warren endorse Clinton because her state was a Clinton win. Is that a new rule? If your state votes for a candidate in the primary, do you have to endorse that candidate? It's nice that Clinton supporters are realizing Sanders is a credible opponent. It will be interesting to see how the Clinton campaign responds to not getting the Final Blow they expected.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
1. If Supers have to vote for how their state does...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:17 AM
Mar 2016

...I fully expect the Clinton supporters to advocate that Sen. Leahy switch his superdelegate vote. I'm sure those calls will be made any minute now.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
2. I can't speak for other Hillary supporters, but I am happy with the outcome tonight.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:23 AM
Mar 2016

Things were becoming so contentious between the two sides, that I think having Bernie experience a few victories was a good way to equalize us all, and maybe calm everyone down. I always thought that having Bernie around for a while would allow the liberal voices to get a bigger say in the ultimate direction of Hillary's campaign, and I think that has happened. I'm one of those people who likes what Bernie has to say...but I like Clinton and her experience a bit more.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
5. Liberal voices will get no say
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:29 AM
Mar 2016

in the ultimate direction of Hillary's campaign.

Liberals will get a few bones thrown and be expected to roll over and play dead.
Don't you know how it really works?

Let's make sure Bernie stays "around" as a candidate.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
3. It will be interesting. I need to wait until the morning
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:25 AM
Mar 2016

for both parties, that is, for the final delegate count.

I also been pointing to this... the 2008 primary,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Tuesday,_2008

This is actually going the way I expected... I like contested primaries

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
6. Wait, who's attempting to make lemonade?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:39 AM
Mar 2016

I will once again preface my comments by pointing out that I'm not a Clinton supporter. Those who think this was a good night for Sanders do not understand basic math and the meaning of demographics. While tonight didn't go as poorly for Sanders as it could have, he had a bad night. When all the results are in, Clinton will have made a *huge* gain in delegates. With the following states yet to vote: MI, OH, PA, NY, NJ, MD, FL, MO, LA, MS, IL, CA. And Washington DC.

On top of all that, there are no winner-take-all states, so Clinton will get a proportion of the delegates even in those states where Sanders can reasonably be expected to win (by a small margin for the most part). States that typically don't have all that many delegates to begin with.

Sorry, folks, but wishing doesn't make it so. Clinton will be the nominee.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
7. Hillary's awesomely funded, establishment-backed pay-to-play shtick plays great in deep red states.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:03 AM
Mar 2016

And nowhere else.

Democrats could literally not field a worse candidate than Hillary Clinton in terms of riling up the Republican base to vote against her while leaving the Democratic base stone cold. Nor could the Democrats find a single worse individual to nominate in terms of unfavorability ratings among independent voters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Making lemonade from lemo...