Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:55 PM Mar 2016

Hillary Clinton racks up another union endorsement

Hillary Clinton is cornering the union vote ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

The Democratic presidential front-runner now has at least two dozen union endorsements, according to her campaign, after the Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) backed her on Wednesday.

The OPEIU represents 103,000 workers across North America. It called Clinton “by far the most qualified to lead our nation.”

“Our country’s chief executive should be someone who is experienced in both domestic and foreign affairs and someone who understands and prioritizes the needs of working families,” OPEIU President Richard Lanigan said in a statement. “Hillary Clinton has this experience, and [we have] determined that of all the candidates, she is by far the most qualified to lead our nation.

“We urge our members to make sure to vote in all primaries and to work as volunteers on her historic campaign to get out the vote,” he added.

The most important campaign issues for OPEIU include the minimum wage, income inequality and the protection of workers’ right to organize, the union said.


read: http://thehill.com/regulation/labor/272392-clinton-picks-up-two-dozen-union-endorsements

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton racks up another union endorsement (Original Post) bigtree Mar 2016 OP
I'm sure they took a member vote too right? revbones Mar 2016 #1
Somebody will be along shortly to proudly stand with them. n/t TCJ70 Mar 2016 #2
Makes a lot of sense. Broward Mar 2016 #3
Did the members get to vote ??? SamKnause Mar 2016 #4
this is just like EVERY union endorsement touted by campaigns for decades bigtree Mar 2016 #6
It's an endorsement made by the 'executive board' and not by polling or vote of the membership Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #20
Nice..... Beacool Mar 2016 #5
Good choice KingFlorez Mar 2016 #7
Did they take into account how often she's been wrong? Lone_Wolf Mar 2016 #8
they did consider the alternative bigtree Mar 2016 #9
Yeah clearly choie Mar 2016 #10
the election there bigtree Mar 2016 #12
She Lost!! choie Mar 2016 #14
she WON the night bigtree Mar 2016 #16
» bigtree Mar 2016 #11
Remember when the Teamsters endorsed Ronald Reagan? Yeah, so do I. n/t Umbral18 Mar 2016 #13
Thank you! Lucinda Mar 2016 #15
I proudly stand. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #17
I saw a list of all the endorsements for both D candidates -- another fake endorsement pdsimdars Mar 2016 #18
Name one Nurse's union that supports Hillary. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #19
supporters of the candidate with less votes bigtree Mar 2016 #21
Within the sub group of unions I can. n/t Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #23
Two dozen union endorsements. Solid. oasis Mar 2016 #22

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
6. this is just like EVERY union endorsement touted by campaigns for decades
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

...Sanders supporters aren't going to reinvent the union nominating processes to suit their narrative about their second-place candidate.

Besides, following this false standard you set, your own candidate would forfeit several endorsements from several sources.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
20. It's an endorsement made by the 'executive board' and not by polling or vote of the membership
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 12:02 PM
Mar 2016

nor by consensus among the locals. It is their process and not one that would be accepted by the membership of my Unions ever. I vastly prefer Unions which have strong, predetermined endorsement protocols that involve as much input from working membership and vested retirees as possible. I prefer democracy.
The same goes for advocacy groups like HRC. 30 board members made that endorsement and then they tried to assign it to people they don't even respect enough to ask for an opinion, not even an opinion to ignore. They just get together for a smart cocktail and a quick 'vote'. I prefer membership driven decisions, community based advocacy.

Lone_Wolf

(1,603 posts)
8. Did they take into account how often she's been wrong?
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 09:13 PM
Mar 2016

“by far the most qualified to lead our nation.”

Did they take into account how often she's been wrong?

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
9. they did consider the alternative
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

...and apparently found him lacking.

For all of the faults you attribute to Hillary, they thought your candidate was worse.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
18. I saw a list of all the endorsements for both D candidates -- another fake endorsement
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:19 AM
Mar 2016

The list contained (1) the organization, (2) the candidate they endorsed and (3) the methodology. This is a BIG difference and also astonishing.
In every organization that endorsed Hillary it was the LEADERSHIP that endorsed her.
In every organization that endorsed Bernie, it was done by polling the MEMBERSHIP.

Do you get that? The PEOPLE in the organization want Bernie but the few 1% leadership were persuaded or threatened or promised something to endorse Hillary.

The corporate management is for her, the corporate media is for her, because she is THEIR corporate candidate.
The people want Bernie.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
19. Name one Nurse's union that supports Hillary.
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:26 AM
Mar 2016

Good luck with that.


So much for "cornering" the union vote.



All she ever gets is some union leaders that support her. The rank and file are overwhelmingly with Bernie.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton racks up ...