Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:16 PM Mar 2016

Not Scientific, but...

I live in the Northwest Suburbs of Chicago; a fairly Republican area. I have seen several Bernie Sanders signs and NOT A SINGLE HILLARY CLINTON SIGN! I have no doubt people will vote for her on Tuesday, but it is clear there is a major enthusism gap. If she is the nominee in November, this should be very concerning.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not Scientific, but... (Original Post) Chasstev365 Mar 2016 OP
I wonder how many of the 600 workers who just lost their jobs at Nabisco will vote for her PonyUp Mar 2016 #1
A supposed enthusiasm gap, yet leading in the popular vote. Metric System Mar 2016 #2
Yard signs? Feh! Everyone knows that COUNTING BUMPER STICKERS ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #3
Thanks Jackie! Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #4
Ha! Congratulations! :-P NurseJackie Mar 2016 #5
 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
1. I wonder how many of the 600 workers who just lost their jobs at Nabisco will vote for her
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:19 PM
Mar 2016

Thanks, ^N^A^F^T^A

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
3. Yard signs? Feh! Everyone knows that COUNTING BUMPER STICKERS ...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:10 AM
Mar 2016

... it's the only accurate way to predict a winner!



Go, Hillary!

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
4. Thanks Jackie!
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:27 AM
Mar 2016

I'm starting to recognize the Hillary supporters who are blind to the fact Hillary is a majorly flawed candidate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Not Scientific, but...