Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:29 AM Mar 2016

We have two candidates in the Democratic Primaries.

Some of us support one of them, while others support the other. Both candidates have been supporting Democratic issues for a long time. They have somewhat different plans if elected as President, but there is much they share.

As a lifelong Democrat, I'll be more than pleased to vote for whomever becomes our nominee.

I think we should be pointing out the differences, but with the recognition that we're talking about two Democratic candidates, not opponents of our Party.

Thanks for reading.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We have two candidates in the Democratic Primaries. (Original Post) MineralMan Mar 2016 OP
Very logical, thoughtful and realistic. How could ANY intelligent person be against this? NurseJackie Mar 2016 #1
I'm "intelligent" marions ghost Mar 2016 #2
That's fine, but enough people may not agree with you MineralMan Mar 2016 #4
Good for you marions ghost Mar 2016 #7
I would never say such a thing. There are intelligent people MineralMan Mar 2016 #11
In an imperfect world, getting close is the best we can do. MineralMan Mar 2016 #3
Easy: for some of us, it's not "our" party. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #10
The John Madden of political commentary. Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #5
Let me get this straight. Are you trying to tell me... Wilms Mar 2016 #6
There will be nothing dignified about this! Dem2 Mar 2016 #8
We have one democrat.. dubyadiprecession Mar 2016 #9
When did Democrats start praising the Reagans for being AIDS activists? That's what makes this Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #12

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
2. I'm "intelligent"
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:13 AM
Mar 2016

by any standard, and I'm against Hillary for President. Now HOW could that happen?

I guess I'm standing with teh stupid? Doesn't feel like that......... Feels like being with the smart AND wise....

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
4. That's fine, but enough people may not agree with you
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:16 AM
Mar 2016

to nominate a different Democrat for President. What then? I recognize that my choice is not always the one I will be able to vote for in any given November. So, I vote for the Democrat, because that leads to a better outcome than the alternative.

Right now, we're in the process of selecting a Democratic nominee. I've played my part in that. Now, I'm ready to help the eventual nominee beat the Republican in November. As I said, I'll be happy to support either Democratic candidate at that time.

It's the only decision that makes any sense to me.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
7. Good for you
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:21 AM
Mar 2016

-- I responded to the post putting out the idea that "intelligent" people don't vote for Bernie. I mean how could they NOT love Hillary and all she stands for? They must not be reasonable, rational people like all Clinton fans.



Your comments on that statement?

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
3. In an imperfect world, getting close is the best we can do.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:13 AM
Mar 2016

We have two political parties. That's it. I prefer the Democratic Party, despite its failure to be 100% representative of my own viewpoints. In any given election, the Democrat will be the preferred choice for me. I've seen both parties in power. That's why I prefer Democrats to be in the majority in all branches of government, local, state and federal.

When the General Election comes around, I have a binary choice to make. It's an easy one, I think.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
10. Easy: for some of us, it's not "our" party.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:33 AM
Mar 2016

I'm not a Democrat.* I'm an independent progressive. The party branding is meaningless to me. I'm here (and I almost always vote Democrat) because I share values with the majority of posters here, Democrats and fellow independents alike. When the Democrat in a given race is someone largely in agreement with those values, I'm happy to vote for them. Sometimes there's a candidate in those races that's closer to my views (usually Green Party), but the Democrat is close enough, and will have more actual influence, as a member of one of the major parties.

But while Hillary Clinton and I certainly share values (to the degree I can determine what her real values are, which is part of the problem), we also have areas of disagreement. Huge, gaping, probably-irreconcilable gaps of disagreement... Without any "support the crest" (if I might use a soccer metaphor) motivation, I have more reason to vote against her than for her. Simply put and for a host of reasons I don't see a need to rehash here, I don't think she'd make a good president.

So yeah, I've been flip-flopping, but have finally decided to vote for Hillary if my state ends up in play (about as likely as Donald Trump pausing a campaign rally to permit Muslim prayers). There is the SCOTUS to think about, and I'm not confident of reclaiming the Senate to prevent "Justice Cruz" (*shudder*). But I'll probably never stop resenting the lost opportunity of a "prefect storm" situation for putting a progressive in the Oval Office.

* Well, okay, technically I am right now: I switched registration to vote in our primary in May.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
6. Let me get this straight. Are you trying to tell me...
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

1. We have two candidates in the Democratic Primaries.
2. Some of us support one of them, while others support the other.
3. Both candidates have been supporting Democratic issues for a long time.
4. They have somewhat different plans if elected as President, but there is much they share.

Is that what you are saying. Why, oh why, did you not let us in on this sooner???

I realize that as one of the few adults in the room, you won't always share everything with the children you speak down to. But you COULD have pointed out those facts sooner.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
8. There will be nothing dignified about this!
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:29 AM
Mar 2016

You've already been called to the mat for being patronizing, how dare you ask for a little civility.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
12. When did Democrats start praising the Reagans for being AIDS activists? That's what makes this
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:58 AM
Mar 2016

cycle confusing. Hillary keeps sounding like a Republican from the 90's. I despised those Republicans.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We have two candidates in...