Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PPP Poll: Tues Primaries Tighten (Original Post) kenn3d Mar 2016 OP
Looking good. Go Bernie! morningfog Mar 2016 #1
Interesting phrasing. Let's just show the numbers from PPP: Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #2
Accurate phrasing Karmadillo Mar 2016 #3
Sanders leads in just 1 of 5 states, and that lead is 1%. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #5
Just remember Hillary led by 30 points in Michigan, greater than 99% chance of winning . . . pdsimdars Mar 2016 #10
Sanders is now the favorite in MO and IL. A close loss by Hillary will be a victory for her. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #12
LOL! rock Mar 2016 #26
Psych 101: lower the expectations Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #27
Interesting and accurate. 5 and 3 point spread, morningfog Mar 2016 #4
The only thing that changed is the polling method due to Michigan. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #7
Lol. morningfog Mar 2016 #9
My response exactly. "We only lost by 10 points! Hurray! We won a state we should have won! Hurray!" Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #13
And now campaign mgr Mook is warning that Clinton may lose OH, MO, & IL. RiverLover Mar 2016 #6
Information known for over a week to anyone paying attention. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #11
Then why is 538 predicting Hillary's 98% chance of winning Ohio, a 95% chance of winning Illinois & RiverLover Mar 2016 #14
I don't know or care. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #15
Well, at least that is true. RiverLover Mar 2016 #16
You have no idea if it's true or not. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #18
Hillary was born and raised in Illinois. I think it is a big upset if she loses. mucifer Mar 2016 #23
Thanks. I saw that last night nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #35
OH, IL and MO looking good. We need closer losses in FL and NC. morningfog Mar 2016 #8
Why would we championing the candidate Republicans favor? Jitter65 Mar 2016 #17
Sanders beats Trump in national polls for the GE match up. RiverLover Mar 2016 #19
We? nt kenn3d Mar 2016 #20
Secret Clinton meeting Gwhittey Mar 2016 #21
Interesting - Republicans planning to vote in the Democratic primaries CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #22
Or they are crossing over the way many mucifer Mar 2016 #24
Both the Republican and Democratic bases have been shrinking CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #28
I know it's anecdotal. But, I have heard of republicans leaving the repub party mucifer Mar 2016 #31
It's easy to understand... kenn3d Mar 2016 #25
To think that more than a few Republicans... CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #30
The Hillary team will be thrilled if these are the final results. DCBob Mar 2016 #29
Absolutely, virtual ties are losses when you're far behind CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #32
Proportional allocation is the key and affects both sides. DCBob Mar 2016 #34
I wouldn't count on that & don't Sanders supporters think SD's are "undemocratic"? CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #36
Yeah, I noticed that too how the Sanders team is now "Super" friendly.. funny. DCBob Mar 2016 #37
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Mar 2016 #33
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
2. Interesting phrasing. Let's just show the numbers from PPP:
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:50 AM
Mar 2016

OH: Clinton 46, Sanders 41
IL: Clinton 48, Sanders 45
MO: Clinton 46, Sanders 47
FL: Clinton 57, Sanders 32
NC: Clinton 56, Sanders 37

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
10. Just remember Hillary led by 30 points in Michigan, greater than 99% chance of winning . . .
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:57 AM
Mar 2016

What happened there.
We'll just have to see won't we.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
12. Sanders is now the favorite in MO and IL. A close loss by Hillary will be a victory for her.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:59 AM
Mar 2016

A win in either state will be the greatest upset in the history of politics!!!!!11

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
4. Interesting and accurate. 5 and 3 point spread,
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:51 AM
Mar 2016

tightened from 20-30 points just a week ago. Serious tightening.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
7. The only thing that changed is the polling method due to Michigan.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:54 AM
Mar 2016

Sanders hasn't tightened anything. His popularity among Democrats has actually decreased.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
13. My response exactly. "We only lost by 10 points! Hurray! We won a state we should have won! Hurray!"
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:00 AM
Mar 2016
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
11. Information known for over a week to anyone paying attention.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:57 AM
Mar 2016

However, pretending to be the massive underdog allows you to label a close loss a Victory and a narrow win a Huge Upset.

That worked in Michigan, but we're onto the game.

Bottom line: Clinton's delegate lead will widen on Tuesday to about 275.

mucifer

(23,565 posts)
23. Hillary was born and raised in Illinois. I think it is a big upset if she loses.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:31 AM
Mar 2016

I never thought Bernie would win the nomination. But, you have to admit with his only superpac being a group of nurses and starting with zero name recognition to most of the USA he is doing very well and really getting his message out.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
8. OH, IL and MO looking good. We need closer losses in FL and NC.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:54 AM
Mar 2016

If Bernie can keep it close to even split in IL and OH, and take MO he is still looking good.

I'd like to see the losses in FL and NC closer. Hillary will take a chunk of delegates in FL at those numbers which will just put more distance between them.

Go Bernie!

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
17. Why would we championing the candidate Republicans favor?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:07 AM
Mar 2016

They aren't going to vote for him in the GE and you know it. Independents, either. Remember, Sander is the longest standing Independent in Congress. We are being duped and it is sad.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
22. Interesting - Republicans planning to vote in the Democratic primaries
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:30 AM
Mar 2016

Are voting overwhelming for Sanders:

OH - 56-21 for Sanders
IL - 62- 23 for Sanders
MO - 66-23 for sanders

My wife and I often vote in the Republican primaries here in AL - for their weakest candidate, the one least likely to win in the general election.

Looks like Republicans in Ohio, Illinois and Missouri plan on using the same tactic.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
28. Both the Republican and Democratic bases have been shrinking
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:55 AM
Mar 2016

There have been some defections on the far right for the Republicans and the far left for Democrats, but the vast majority of those leaving the two major parties are moderates in he middle. This has left the remaining Democratic Party members more liberal and those remaining in the Republican Party even more conservative.

To think that many of the registered Republicans planning to vote in Democratic primary are doing so to vote for the most liberal Democratic candidate in recent memory is absurd. Most are Republicans that don't care much which Republican candidate wins as long as the Democratic candidate is defeated. If you are a Republican thinking about Supreme Court choices, etc., its not a bad strategy.

It is easy to see why some Republicans would think that a Socialist would be the easiest Democrat to beat. This is exactly why the Koch brothers have so far spent $1.5 million on ads supporting Sanders.

It is no honor for any Democratic candidate to be the top choice among Republicans. However, at this point the Sanders campaign is so desperate for votes they can't be picky.

mucifer

(23,565 posts)
31. I know it's anecdotal. But, I have heard of republicans leaving the repub party
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:10 AM
Mar 2016

and becoming strong supporters of Bernie.

kenn3d

(486 posts)
25. It's easy to understand...
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:41 AM
Mar 2016

That a large number of Republicans are feeling quite frustrated to have essentially no valid candidate in their party to vote for. Some will certainly switch even for the primaries.

And the VAST majority of Republicans have been thoroughly trained by FOX to hate Hillary more than anyone or anything in this world. So crossovers to the Democratic ballots will largely favor Sanders.

Bernie will be the only palatable alternative to lots of them in the GE also. And their votes for him will be significant.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
30. To think that more than a few Republicans...
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:04 AM
Mar 2016

...would vote for a Socialist for the right reasons is absurd. They just don't care which Republican wins, they just want to make sure that the Democrat loses. They are going to vote for Sanders for the same reason that the Koch brothers have spent $1.5 million on ads supporting Sanders.

Hey, it doesn't matter if these Republicans are trying to thrust sticks in the spokes, Sanders is going to need every vote he can get to just hang on.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
29. The Hillary team will be thrilled if these are the final results.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:03 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie simply falls farther and farther behind.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
32. Absolutely, virtual ties are losses when you're far behind
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:15 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary is virtually assured of gaining quite a few more delegates than Sanders tomorrow leaving him still further behind with even few states left to decide.

There are no winner takes all states on the Democratic side. Sanders has to start winning big or his campaign is doomed. I don't see any big wins for Sanders tomorrow. For the Sanders team it's not a matter of gaining ground tomorrow, it is a matter of not losing ground and surviving.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
34. Proportional allocation is the key and affects both sides.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:53 AM
Mar 2016

It means Bernie cant catch up and also means Hillary cant finish him off. I looks like its going to the convention undecided with Hillary leading by a substantial amount. Then the supers will put her over the top.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
36. I wouldn't count on that & don't Sanders supporters think SD's are "undemocratic"?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:19 PM
Mar 2016

I see that suddenly Bernie and his supporters went from hating super delegates as "undemocratic" to loving them because they are the only factor which might keep Hillary from claiming the nomination before before the convention. After all, if it it weren't for the super delegates, in a two person race the person leading after the primaries and caucuses are over would automatically be the winner. With the super delegates Sanders possibly extend the race into the convention. This Sanders supporters are disingenuous when they call for rule changes only if they feel that those rule changes benefit their candidate.

So are the super delegates Sanders' new best friend? No, for two reasons:

1. Hillary can still claim the nomination before the convention. She only needs to lead in the pledged delegate count by half of the number of super delegates plus one. (Give yourself a few minutes and you will figure that out for yourself.) There are 712 super delegates so Hillary needs a lead of 357 pledged delegates when the primaries and caucuses are over. Right now Hillary leads Sanders in super delegate category by a margin of 206 and she should increase that lead today. Right now she only has to increase her lead over Sanders by 151 pledged delegates to win outright.

2. Even if she does not a lead of least than 357 pledged delegates after all of state elections are over, and the race continues on into the convention, Hillary will win on the first ballot. There is no way that more than half of the super delegates are going to vote for a non Democrat, especially one they believe would be sliced and diced by the Republican hit machine in the general election. Heck, I sincerely doubt that the super delegates would give Sanders the nomination even if he was leading in pledged delegates going in to the convention. But that isn't going to happen.

The reason isn't going to happen is because Bernie would have to start winning large states by very big margins to catch up. Virtual ties like the Sanders campaign hoping for tomorrow is just not going to get it don't.

Official Democratic Party position: "Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don't have to be in a position where they are running against grass-roots activists."

It's not over yet but the fat lady has been warming up for a while.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
37. Yeah, I noticed that too how the Sanders team is now "Super" friendly.. funny.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016

I think we are in agreement regarding how this ends. Hillary has a big lead going into the convention and she wins it on the first ballot with most of the Supers voting for her. The Bernie die-hards might be angry and complain but that is how its going to go down.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»PPP Poll: Tues Primaries ...