Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:14 AM Mar 2016

Bernie is running as a Dem because it's the most effective way to work for change

Last edited Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:52 PM - Edit history (1)

at this crucial moment in history.

The man has never been about "media attention" or ego. He's just trying to help make the country and the world we need.

Why is it so hard to accept that he has no cynical motives in this?

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie is running as a Dem because it's the most effective way to work for change (Original Post) Ken Burch Mar 2016 OP
Anyone who challenges Hillary is automatically The Enemy. djean111 Mar 2016 #1
Yep. In fact, that's a charge that's easier to level at someone when they run 3rd party. kcr Mar 2016 #2
Those doing the smearing don't want the party to move left. They are happy with the pseudo-comfort rhett o rick Mar 2016 #4
I think that's part of it. It's really complicated as usual. kcr Mar 2016 #6
They are comfortable with the status quo and able to ignore those around them rhett o rick Mar 2016 #7
It was. But Bernie is changing that. kcr Mar 2016 #10
Politico - smarmy outfit that they are - put up a hit piece Triana Mar 2016 #3
Politico is a Third Way PoS. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #5
I'm sure David Brock has a few friends at politico... ConsiderThis_2016 Mar 2016 #9
Ron Paul (R) TX14, switched from Libertarian party to republican party, for exactly the same reason ConsiderThis_2016 Mar 2016 #8
Funny that the Democratic Party had no trouble with Bernie caucusing with them for 25 years BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #11
exactly! renate Mar 2016 #16
Bernie should have media attention that has been lacking. All in it together Mar 2016 #12
You are right on one point. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #13
It's A vehicle. And it's ONLY a vehicle if we nominate progressive candidates. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #17
So the Democratic Party is his 'vehicle.' kstewart33 Mar 2016 #26
Not for "his individual gain"-for the good of the people. n/t. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #27
Another kick. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #14
It's only a progressive vehicle for change if we avoid nominating centrists. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #15
Not true. kcr Mar 2016 #18
I'm not calling for giving up OR going third-party. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #21
I didn't think you were calling for third party kcr Mar 2016 #22
I didn't mean that we shouldn't run progressives. I'm sorry if I somehow conveyed that idea. Ken Burch Mar 2016 #23
He's running as a Dem as to not spoil. joshcryer Mar 2016 #19
Every Bernie thread... TeeYiYi Mar 2016 #20
I am a Hillary supporter, but think that Bernie running in the primary only helped her campaign. anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #24
Because he's a damn carpetbagger. kstewart33 Mar 2016 #25
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Anyone who challenges Hillary is automatically The Enemy.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:23 AM
Mar 2016

This is what the Democratic Party has come to - the Hillary Party.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
2. Yep. In fact, that's a charge that's easier to level at someone when they run 3rd party.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:28 AM
Mar 2016

I don't get smearing him for this. It should be encouraged, especially if we want the party moving to the left.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
4. Those doing the smearing don't want the party to move left. They are happy with the pseudo-comfort
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:36 AM
Mar 2016

of Big Corporations taking good care of them. That's more important than solving any of the problems facing us.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
6. I think that's part of it. It's really complicated as usual.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

I think a lot of it is the comfort of stick with what you know. Because for so long, we've been presented with the lesser-of-two-evils dilemma thanks to our two party system. When we're finally actually presented with a candidate we can vote for, for some of us it's a thrilling jump at the chance, finally! It's hard to understand why it isn't like that for everyone. For some people I think it's like jumping off a cliff of uncertainty. Is he electable? What if people think he's a communist? What if this country isn't ready?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
7. They are comfortable with the status quo and able to ignore those around them
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:01 AM
Mar 2016

that are suffering. We are currently living in a corporate run Oligarchy and moving toward a fascistic state. The lesser of evils is moving us closer and closer.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
10. It was. But Bernie is changing that.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:14 AM
Mar 2016

More and more are jumping on board. The demographics are changing. The GOP is imploding. Things are getting better. The change is happening!

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
3. Politico - smarmy outfit that they are - put up a hit piece
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:34 AM
Mar 2016

which headlined that Bernie "ran on Dem ticket to get media attention!" -- and LEFT OUT the rest of the context of this story. Predictably. It was all of 2-3 paragraphs.

When he began the campaign, he clearly stated that he did not want to divide the Dem voters and end up with a Republican President: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/04/30/bernie_sanders_joins_2016_field_--_as_a_democrat_126448.html

Someone wisely pointed out that there were MULTIPLE reasons he chose to run as a Dem - media exposure being only ONE of them, an important context POLITICO chose to leave out...http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511492969#post11

So yea, hit piece by a slimebag outfit which left most of the story OUT and pushed an incendiary headline. Really, just typical media crap.

ConsiderThis_2016

(274 posts)
8. Ron Paul (R) TX14, switched from Libertarian party to republican party, for exactly the same reason
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:05 AM
Mar 2016

Exposure. How many people sell their homes (By Owner) vs using a Realtor? There is no secret to the selfishness of those whom will stop at nothing to retain control... in both parties.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
11. Funny that the Democratic Party had no trouble with Bernie caucusing with them for 25 years
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:17 AM
Mar 2016

If memory serves, Bernie created a Democratic majority in the Senate at one point by caucusing with them. But he doesn't know his place, nor does anybody else who would dare to run against Queen Hillary.

renate

(13,776 posts)
16. exactly!
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

This was a practical decision (and a smart one), not a change of heart. The Democrats in the Senate have always been plenty happy to have him on our side, and by running as a Democrat and not a third-party nominee he won't split the general-election vote. The only people who don't automatically benefit from this decision are Hillary and the Republican nominee who would otherwise be guaranteed to win.

All in it together

(275 posts)
12. Bernie should have media attention that has been lacking.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:18 AM
Mar 2016

Donald Trump is running for media attention, it's like free advertisement for him and his companies.
Bernie has important things to say that deserve media attention and has had very little. He's in this race to win and make a difference with us. Running as a Democrat has put barriers up to his advancing his ideas, with DWS and Hillary controlling the party. Bernie didn't want to run in a third party which can split the vote and lead to Republicans winning.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
13. You are right on one point.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:20 AM
Mar 2016

The Democratic Party is the vehicle for progressive change. It's a great time to be a democrat.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
17. It's A vehicle. And it's ONLY a vehicle if we nominate progressive candidates.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

It can't be progressive to just say "you have to support the Democratic party unquestioningly and settle for whatever it's leaders will allow in the platform.

If the freedom movement had left it at that in the early Sixties, we'd still HAVE Jim Crow.

We need a progressive president and congress...and we EQUALLY need that president and congress to accept protest and grassroots activism as valid and to encourage the building of a longterm movement for social AND economic justice.

Winning elections is NOT enough.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
26. So the Democratic Party is his 'vehicle.'
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:21 PM
Mar 2016

Tell that to the millions of people who have been Democrats for many years, in my case, decades. I'd wager not too many will appreciate their party being used for anyone's individual gain. Here today, gone tomorrow. Very classy, Bernie.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
14. Another kick.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:36 AM
Mar 2016

This is huge and I knew the evolution would come. The Democratic Party is the progressives vehicle for change. Thanks for the op. Didn't think my day could get much better. I love this new line of thought from Sanders supporters and it's absolutely correct.

Love it!!!

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
15. It's only a progressive vehicle for change if we avoid nominating centrists.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:38 PM
Mar 2016

(note: this comment is NOT HRC-exclusive).

Centrists elected as Dems always work to limit or stop change.

And I didn't say that the ONLY way to work for change is to elect Dems.

Organizing movements for social and economic justice(causes that are NEVER at odds with each other, if if they are distinct) is equally important.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
18. Not true.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 08:28 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie clearly showed that progressive messages work. It would be such a shame to undo all of that and go back to the lesser of two evils song and dance while progressives flail away as 3rd party spoilers. You don't give up. You keep trying.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
21. I'm not calling for giving up OR going third-party.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 10:44 PM
Mar 2016

Just saying that electing Democrats is not the only thing we should be doing.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
22. I didn't think you were calling for third party
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:02 PM
Mar 2016

But I think I misread you a bit. I thought you meant that running progressives in the Dem party alone wouldn't be enough if we lost. Even when we lose, it helps move the party to the left. They have to compete.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
23. I didn't mean that we shouldn't run progressives. I'm sorry if I somehow conveyed that idea.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:04 PM
Mar 2016

My bad for less-than-effective phrasing.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
19. He's running as a Dem as to not spoil.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 08:31 PM
Mar 2016

He could have easily pulled a Nader but he's a bigger man than that.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
24. I am a Hillary supporter, but think that Bernie running in the primary only helped her campaign.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:08 PM
Mar 2016

I think people who talk about him running as a Democrat are concerned that he won't be a loyal enough party member to step aside when it is in the best interest of the party. We'll see how it all plays out to see if their concerns are valid.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
25. Because he's a damn carpetbagger.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:16 PM
Mar 2016

How many days after November 3 will it be before Bernie leaves the Democratic Party? He will have used the party for his own interest, he's done, and so he drops out. I give him one week.

Meanwhile, he expects Democrats to vote him in as the leader of our party.

In your dreams, Bernie.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie is running as a De...