2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNYTIMES: Clinton’s Bold Vision, Hidden in Plain Sight?
Excellent and thoughtful piece on Clinton's approach to policy and governing and also the challenges that still lie ahead of her.
But voters and pundits alike complain that shes a cold-eyed realist who hasnt articulated what George H. W. Bush once wistfully referred to as the vision thing. Instead, its Bernie Sanders who has been cast as the visionary in the Democratic contest, an idealist brimming with inspiring (if often unrealistic) proposals.
But Mrs. Clinton does have an ambitious vision, and its one that should be inspiring. The fact that it remains mostly hidden from view reveals more about our current political environment than it does about her more about how we understand (or misunderstand) our nations past and present than about the comparative merits of her governing philosophy.
Clintons Bold Vision, Hidden in Plain Sight?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Ron Green
(9,823 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Impedimentus
(898 posts)are mostly nightmares for most of us.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)The word "race" appears once (and only in the context of a political contest). The word racial appears nary at all. The word "inequality" isn't part of Hillary's Bold Plan either.
And guess what? The words black, lives, and matter are missing as well!
Bold vision my flabby ass.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)consent of the governed disturbing and subject to usurpation by global fascism, or so I so conveyed to Hillary in 1970. I am very regretful that my grave concerns then are largely being realized now.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)and lied about by Hillary.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)And the media has done pretty much the same to all. they only report on the horse race. That's cause they are interested in entertaining more than informing.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)I think my coments show the contrast between the candidates and how they are treated by the corrupted media.
flor-de-jasmim
(2,126 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)you do understand the difference between a Times reporter and an outside Op Ed contributor, I assume.