Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Csainvestor

(388 posts)
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:51 PM Mar 2016

Hillary won MA and IL by 1 POINT

Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:21 PM - Edit history (1)

Two of the largest states with some of the largest cities in the country, and she barely won.

Bernie has massively outperformed the polls, Hillary is underwhelming in her victories.

PS. this New York poll is garbage.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary won MA and IL by 1 POINT (Original Post) Csainvestor Mar 2016 OP
In other words, Bernie lost. grossproffit Mar 2016 #1
Failed To Hit His Required Target Badly Stallion Mar 2016 #4
That's why we have Bernie math. grossproffit Mar 2016 #13
Or more truthfully, the big name, big money, inevitable, annointed one BARELY won. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #8
Half WHAT party? 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #17
Even if that's true (and it ain't) Independents make up 38% of the voting public! Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #52
States don't vote people do. Hillary is leading in votes against all candidates upaloopa Mar 2016 #18
Actually, the majority of the party in the north doesn't want Bernie as the nominee. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #35
I love the way Sanders people denigrate Clinton's primary performances and yet she is soundly.... George II Mar 2016 #48
Only if you use the normal definition of the word "lost" The Second Stone Mar 2016 #22
Wonder why the OP left out Ohio, Florida, and North Carolina. As for New York there have been two still_one Mar 2016 #39
Yup workinclasszero Mar 2016 #57
Hillary will win big here in NY. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #2
And in PA. livetohike Mar 2016 #5
Yep! hrmjustin Mar 2016 #6
Both New York and PA are closed primaries, which means only DEMOCRATS are involved in electing the still_one Mar 2016 #40
NYC is Hillary country. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #46
Yay!!! A win is a win. Massive blowouts across the entire South. livetohike Mar 2016 #3
It's like bizarro world here. grossproffit Mar 2016 #7
We will not win any of those OwlinAZ Mar 2016 #37
Obama won Virginia and Florida twice. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #44
Obama won North Carolina and Hillary can, too. NC will not go for Trump. yardwork Mar 2016 #56
Obama won Florida and Virginia twice and North Carolina once. Zynx Mar 2016 #49
Hillary Clinton is not Obama. surrealAmerican Mar 2016 #55
Seriously with spreads like that you have to hand it to the Clintons. ucrdem Mar 2016 #9
TheClintons are dirty OwlinAZ Mar 2016 #38
Remind me again what her number was in Florida? MadBadger Mar 2016 #10
That's why we have a system of Czechs and balances! Tanuki Mar 2016 #24
He's got some Russian to do to catch up with Clinton... NuclearDem Mar 2016 #33
She leads by 300 delegates I guess that means Bernie is winning upaloopa Mar 2016 #11
Bernie underperformed last week in every state redstateblues Mar 2016 #12
Polls did not suggest any wins... the polls were right. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #47
She doesn't need to win at all anymore. Codeine Mar 2016 #14
Bernie got clobbered in Boston and lost Chicago alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #15
A win is a win. Delegates. Learn it. Live it. Love it. wyldwolf Mar 2016 #16
How about the Germans? DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #19
You forgot about Poland! nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #43
LOL DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #19
Ok, fine. He can get a participant trophy for keeping it close. Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #21
...the Dodo said "Everybody has won, and all must have prizes" (Lewis Carroll's Caucus Race) Tanuki Mar 2016 #27
BERNIE won MI by 1 POINT brooklynite Mar 2016 #23
Clinton is also 2.7 million votes ahead. But meh... right? Nt seabeyond Mar 2016 #29
Hillary has "won" about six states this way now. Statistically meaningless wins, to be objective. reformist2 Mar 2016 #25
states are not the coin of the realm kennetha Mar 2016 #28
And Bernie barely won MI. Without MI he doesn't have much to talk about. Zynx Mar 2016 #50
Another poster who doesn't understand how primaries work. yardwork Mar 2016 #58
Delegates are awarded proportionately workinclasszero Mar 2016 #60
Barely won is a win. You were never in sports, were you? seabeyond Mar 2016 #26
But primary races are not winner take all, so you never really "win" a whole state. reformist2 Mar 2016 #34
Winner and loser unless the numbers are the same resulting in tie. This truly is not complicated. seabeyond Mar 2016 #36
K&R for Clintons victories. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #30
Jesus....you guys cant just lose can you? nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #31
Yes, I can see how he massively outperformed the *polls* NuclearDem Mar 2016 #32
Bernie won MI by 1.7 nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #41
You don't win elections by beating polls. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #42
There's a word for someone who wins by 1 point. Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #45
There is a lot of fear in Hillary supporters DemocracyDirect Mar 2016 #51
Clinton supporters are not going to win by using ridicule. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #53
at this point MFM008 Mar 2016 #54
Il by 2.2 points BainsBane Mar 2016 #59

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
8. Or more truthfully, the big name, big money, inevitable, annointed one BARELY won.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:56 PM
Mar 2016

Half the party in the Northern states DON'T want her to be the nominee. Those are the states that help Democrats win.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
17. Half WHAT party?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:59 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary has won easily among Dems in every state. It's only independent party crashers that have kept this even as close as it is.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
52. Even if that's true (and it ain't) Independents make up 38% of the voting public!
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 03:30 AM
Mar 2016

They are the biggest group of voters in the country. She MUST have a good portion of Independents to win the GE. So their voting for Sanders is a bad omen for Clinton.

But you are forgetting a whole lot of people who voted for Sanders in big numbers, including the under 30 voters, under 30 women voters, disgusted non-voters drawn back into the party, and labor union member voters, plus people like me--70 year old lifelong Democratic voters!

Then there were crossover Republican voters who don't like any of their candidates and don't like Clinton either, and others including Latinos voting for Sanders and an increasing number of northern African Americans voting for Sanders, especially young African Americans.

You calling all these people "party crashers"? Keep it up!

Do you have any concept of how to build a political party, or how to rebuild one that has seen its ranks decimated by neo-liberalism (spitting on the workers and the poor)? YOU DON'T DO IT BY CALLING PEOPLE WHO VOTE DEMOCRATIC, NO MATTER THE CANDIDATE, "PARTY CRASHERS"!

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
35. Actually, the majority of the party in the north doesn't want Bernie as the nominee.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:45 PM
Mar 2016

Independents and Republicans, on the other hand, do. Democrats crossed over to vote in the GOP primary in Michigan, which is what cost Clinton the win there. In Ohio, independents and Republicans voted in the GOP primary and cost Sanders the win there.

George II

(67,782 posts)
48. I love the way Sanders people denigrate Clinton's primary performances and yet she is soundly....
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:06 PM
Mar 2016

....thrashing their candidate.

In the eyes of the voting public, she is eons ahead of Sanders. So slam Clinton as much as you want, it only makes your candidate look even worse.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
22. Only if you use the normal definition of the word "lost"
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:23 PM
Mar 2016

for willfully delusional values of "lost", he won by exceeding expectations.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
39. Wonder why the OP left out Ohio, Florida, and North Carolina. As for New York there have been two
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:05 PM
Mar 2016

polls this year, with that last one through 3/3, with both having Hillary up by +21.

Also, New York is a closed primary, which means only DEMOCRATS get to select the Democratic nominee

still_one

(92,190 posts)
40. Both New York and PA are closed primaries, which means only DEMOCRATS are involved in electing the
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:06 PM
Mar 2016

Democratic nominee

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
49. Obama won Florida and Virginia twice and North Carolina once.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:45 PM
Mar 2016

He was also competitive in Georgia.

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
55. Hillary Clinton is not Obama.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:48 AM
Mar 2016

She has nothing like his charisma. She doesn't have the same kind of following. She does not appeal to voters in the same way.

If she is the nominee, she will have to use a very different strategy.

Also, after eight years, his "coattails" are too frayed for anyone to ride successfully.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
9. Seriously with spreads like that you have to hand it to the Clintons.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:56 PM
Mar 2016

They know exactly what they need to do and they do it.

MadBadger

(24,089 posts)
10. Remind me again what her number was in Florida?
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:56 PM
Mar 2016

Also, though he has outperformed the poles, he hasnt done as well with the Czechs

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
12. Bernie underperformed last week in every state
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:58 PM
Mar 2016

He was supposed to win MO and OH. He was crushed in the swing state of FL.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
47. Polls did not suggest any wins... the polls were right.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:20 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:15 PM - Edit history (1)

There was some hype where people were suggesting the polls might be wrong, but if you look at the actual polls (i.e. on 538), no states were expected to go for Bernie.

As for whether he underperformed... it varied by state. He slightly over-performed in North Carolina (losing by 14 when he was projected to lose by 18), and performed as expected in Missouri. He slightly under-performed in Ohio (losing by 14, while he was only projected to lose by 11) and in Florida (where he lost by 31 while projected to lose by 29). OTOH, he out-performed in Illinois, losing by 2 when he was projected to lose by 7.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
14. She doesn't need to win at all anymore.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:58 PM
Mar 2016

She can lose from here on out and Senator Sanders will still find it nearly impossible to catch up.

This NY poll is probably bunk, but it's not a state he's going to win, or even get close. All New York is going to do is create a further point deficit from which he cannot reasonably hope to recover.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
15. Bernie got clobbered in Boston and lost Chicago
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:59 PM
Mar 2016

He can't win the big Democratic stronghold cities in primary elections.

It's not a problem with the media, or name recognition, or coverage. It's a problem with his message, beliefs, and policies.

brooklynite

(94,540 posts)
23. BERNIE won MI by 1 POINT
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:25 PM
Mar 2016

then lost IL, MO and OH.

We were told Hillary's firewall was gone.

We were told Bernie would do better when the contest moved north.

Apparently not the rust-belt

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
25. Hillary has "won" about six states this way now. Statistically meaningless wins, to be objective.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:32 PM
Mar 2016

Yet they color the whole state for Hillary, as if she won in a landslide. I guess it makes them feel better, but it doesn't change the underlying weakness in her candidacy.

kennetha

(3,666 posts)
28. states are not the coin of the realm
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:36 PM
Mar 2016

delegates are. this is not the general election and the electoral college we are talking about.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
50. And Bernie barely won MI. Without MI he doesn't have much to talk about.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:47 PM
Mar 2016

See how silly we can be?

yardwork

(61,604 posts)
58. Another poster who doesn't understand how primaries work.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:56 AM
Mar 2016

It's getting boring repeating this over and over. Delegates are awarded proportionately. Read up on it.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
60. Delegates are awarded proportionately
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:01 AM
Mar 2016
Delegates are awarded proportionately...Delegates are awarded proportionately...Delegates are awarded proportionately

Why don't Bernie supporters understand this????
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
36. Winner and loser unless the numbers are the same resulting in tie. This truly is not complicated.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:49 PM
Mar 2016
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
32. Yes, I can see how he massively outperformed the *polls*
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 09:39 PM
Mar 2016

by losing all five states on Tuesday.

I guess we're just going to ignore Florida, where Hillary won by over 30%. Or Ohio, where she won by 14%. Fortunately, neither of them matter in the general election.

 

DemocracyDirect

(708 posts)
51. There is a lot of fear in Hillary supporters
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:54 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie was competitive or a big winner in many early States.

And now if he outperforms the rest of the way...

Bernie will get the nomination.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
53. Clinton supporters are not going to win by using ridicule.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 04:03 AM
Mar 2016

However, they think they are. So maybe just leave them deluded.

Clinton's position is weaker than expected, and Sanders is still a viable candidate, with blue skies ahead. At the least, he is going to crash her coronation party with enough delegates to make some demands on behalf of the working class, who used to be the Democratic Party constituency, and, at best, he can still win the nomination, because all indicators are that his small donor/no superpac-no billionaires campaign is more inspiring to the general population of voters. (He currently beats Trump by twice the margin that Clinton does, and his "favorability" and "trustworthy" ratings are through the roof, while hers are in the toilet. She has no traction with Independents and with under 30 voters.)

But what is worse is that Clinton supporters are helping her LOSE the GE by ridiculing Sanders supporters, ridiculing Independent voters (as above) and generally alienating everybody who doesn't kiss the royal ring. Their strategy is a losing strategy. I've rarely seen such clubbiness and snottiness in people who claim to be Democrats. They don't seem to be thinking people. The issues don't matter to them. Their posts are like knives in a knife fight.

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
54. at this point
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 04:11 AM
Mar 2016

Im to worried about seeing Trump and the GOP go down I don't even consider Sanders much of a factor.
He will have a say/role at the convention, but I don't see him accepting a position in an HRC cabinet , he will just keep rolling as Senator from Vermont.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
59. Il by 2.2 points
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:58 AM
Mar 2016

and MA by 1.4. That sure beats losing.

She leads by 2.5 million votes, not exactly a small amount.

The NY Poll is garbage why? Because you don't like the numbers?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary won MA and IL by ...