2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary won MA and IL by 1 POINT
Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:21 PM - Edit history (1)
Two of the largest states with some of the largest cities in the country, and she barely won.
Bernie has massively outperformed the polls, Hillary is underwhelming in her victories.
PS. this New York poll is garbage.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)you can't barely lose when you are 325 delegates down
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Half the party in the Northern states DON'T want her to be the nominee. Those are the states that help Democrats win.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Hillary has won easily among Dems in every state. It's only independent party crashers that have kept this even as close as it is.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)They are the biggest group of voters in the country. She MUST have a good portion of Independents to win the GE. So their voting for Sanders is a bad omen for Clinton.
But you are forgetting a whole lot of people who voted for Sanders in big numbers, including the under 30 voters, under 30 women voters, disgusted non-voters drawn back into the party, and labor union member voters, plus people like me--70 year old lifelong Democratic voters!
Then there were crossover Republican voters who don't like any of their candidates and don't like Clinton either, and others including Latinos voting for Sanders and an increasing number of northern African Americans voting for Sanders, especially young African Americans.
You calling all these people "party crashers"? Keep it up!
Do you have any concept of how to build a political party, or how to rebuild one that has seen its ranks decimated by neo-liberalism (spitting on the workers and the poor)? YOU DON'T DO IT BY CALLING PEOPLE WHO VOTE DEMOCRATIC, NO MATTER THE CANDIDATE, "PARTY CRASHERS"!
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Independents and Republicans, on the other hand, do. Democrats crossed over to vote in the GOP primary in Michigan, which is what cost Clinton the win there. In Ohio, independents and Republicans voted in the GOP primary and cost Sanders the win there.
George II
(67,782 posts)....thrashing their candidate.
In the eyes of the voting public, she is eons ahead of Sanders. So slam Clinton as much as you want, it only makes your candidate look even worse.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)for willfully delusional values of "lost", he won by exceeding expectations.
still_one
(92,190 posts)polls this year, with that last one through 3/3, with both having Hillary up by +21.
Also, New York is a closed primary, which means only DEMOCRATS get to select the Democratic nominee
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)livetohike
(22,142 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)Democratic nominee
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)livetohike
(22,142 posts)Where was Bernie even close?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)OwlinAZ
(410 posts)southern states.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)yardwork
(61,604 posts)Zynx
(21,328 posts)He was also competitive in Georgia.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)She has nothing like his charisma. She doesn't have the same kind of following. She does not appeal to voters in the same way.
If she is the nominee, she will have to use a very different strategy.
Also, after eight years, his "coattails" are too frayed for anyone to ride successfully.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)They know exactly what they need to do and they do it.
OwlinAZ
(410 posts)and they are dirtiest toward people of their own Party.
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)Also, though he has outperformed the poles, he hasnt done as well with the Czechs
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)He was supposed to win MO and OH. He was crushed in the swing state of FL.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 11:15 PM - Edit history (1)
There was some hype where people were suggesting the polls might be wrong, but if you look at the actual polls (i.e. on 538), no states were expected to go for Bernie.
As for whether he underperformed... it varied by state. He slightly over-performed in North Carolina (losing by 14 when he was projected to lose by 18), and performed as expected in Missouri. He slightly under-performed in Ohio (losing by 14, while he was only projected to lose by 11) and in Florida (where he lost by 31 while projected to lose by 29). OTOH, he out-performed in Illinois, losing by 2 when he was projected to lose by 7.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)She can lose from here on out and Senator Sanders will still find it nearly impossible to catch up.
This NY poll is probably bunk, but it's not a state he's going to win, or even get close. All New York is going to do is create a further point deficit from which he cannot reasonably hope to recover.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)He can't win the big Democratic stronghold cities in primary elections.
It's not a problem with the media, or name recognition, or coverage. It's a problem with his message, beliefs, and policies.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)How about the Germans?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)Tanuki
(14,918 posts)brooklynite
(94,540 posts)then lost IL, MO and OH.
We were told Hillary's firewall was gone.
We were told Bernie would do better when the contest moved north.
Apparently not the rust-belt
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Yet they color the whole state for Hillary, as if she won in a landslide. I guess it makes them feel better, but it doesn't change the underlying weakness in her candidacy.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)delegates are. this is not the general election and the electoral college we are talking about.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)See how silly we can be?
yardwork
(61,604 posts)It's getting boring repeating this over and over. Delegates are awarded proportionately. Read up on it.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Why don't Bernie supporters understand this????
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)LexVegas
(6,060 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)by losing all five states on Tuesday.
I guess we're just going to ignore Florida, where Hillary won by over 30%. Or Ohio, where she won by 14%. Fortunately, neither of them matter in the general election.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)You win them by beating your opponent.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I believe it's "winner".
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Bernie was competitive or a big winner in many early States.
And now if he outperforms the rest of the way...
Bernie will get the nomination.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)However, they think they are. So maybe just leave them deluded.
Clinton's position is weaker than expected, and Sanders is still a viable candidate, with blue skies ahead. At the least, he is going to crash her coronation party with enough delegates to make some demands on behalf of the working class, who used to be the Democratic Party constituency, and, at best, he can still win the nomination, because all indicators are that his small donor/no superpac-no billionaires campaign is more inspiring to the general population of voters. (He currently beats Trump by twice the margin that Clinton does, and his "favorability" and "trustworthy" ratings are through the roof, while hers are in the toilet. She has no traction with Independents and with under 30 voters.)
But what is worse is that Clinton supporters are helping her LOSE the GE by ridiculing Sanders supporters, ridiculing Independent voters (as above) and generally alienating everybody who doesn't kiss the royal ring. Their strategy is a losing strategy. I've rarely seen such clubbiness and snottiness in people who claim to be Democrats. They don't seem to be thinking people. The issues don't matter to them. Their posts are like knives in a knife fight.
MFM008
(19,808 posts)Im to worried about seeing Trump and the GOP go down I don't even consider Sanders much of a factor.
He will have a say/role at the convention, but I don't see him accepting a position in an HRC cabinet , he will just keep rolling as Senator from Vermont.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)and MA by 1.4. That sure beats losing.
She leads by 2.5 million votes, not exactly a small amount.
The NY Poll is garbage why? Because you don't like the numbers?