Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:12 AM Mar 2016

Why is Elizabeth Warren supporting a Hillary Clinton sell-out?

She's in town today for a fundraiser for my Congresswoman (Nydia Velasquez), a superdelegate who's signed up with Clinton (and who, in my opinion, doesn't need the money); not aware of any pro-Sanders candidates getting Warren's support. Maybe that says something...

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is Elizabeth Warren supporting a Hillary Clinton sell-out? (Original Post) brooklynite Mar 2016 OP
Maybe. Iliyah Mar 2016 #1
I bet it do workinclasszero Mar 2016 #11
Warren knows that Hillary actually wants to get things done instead of promising unrealistically. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #2
:-) riversedge Mar 2016 #9
Not too much longer.. Sheepshank Mar 2016 #3
Because Velasquez is a woman and Warren supports women. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #4
this OP is a bit unfair, as the number of prominent Sanders supporters is so small that geek tragedy Mar 2016 #5
Disagree, there are a number of Primary CANDIDATES supporting Sanders... brooklynite Mar 2016 #7
Sure, there are candidates, but are they credible enough to merit endorsements and fundraising? nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #8
Two possibilities... thesquanderer Mar 2016 #14
1+1 = 3 GeorgeGist Mar 2016 #6
Thought you were finally admitting Hillary sold out to the corporate lobby. Never mind.... think Mar 2016 #10
I think HRC supporters do acknowledge that casperthegm Mar 2016 #12
re: "not aware of any pro-Sanders candidates getting Warren's support" thesquanderer Mar 2016 #13
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. this OP is a bit unfair, as the number of prominent Sanders supporters is so small that
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:18 AM
Mar 2016

we really can't draw any meaningful inferences about the lack of endorsements/fundraising they receive.

I mean, even Donna Edwards is endorsing Hillary.

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
7. Disagree, there are a number of Primary CANDIDATES supporting Sanders...
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:25 AM
Mar 2016

Shawn O'connor is right next door in New Hampshire.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
14. Two possibilities...
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:08 AM
Mar 2016

1) If her hidden allegiance is more toward Clinton, there would obviously be no reason for her to go out of her way to support pro-Sanders candidates, unless she also preferred them for other reasons.

2) If her hidden allegiance is more toward Sanders, the same factors that are preventing her from openly endorsing him now would be at work to prevent her from openly endorsing a pro-Sanders candidate, unless, again, she preferred them for other reasons.

I think she probably doesn't want to expend any political capital on an underdog, unless there is an over-riding reason to do so. So I think at this point, she will only do the "safe" endorsements, i.e. incumbents. Or a dem running unopposed (or at least enormously favored) in a challenge against a Republican incumbent. That would be consistent with her behavior so far.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
12. I think HRC supporters do acknowledge that
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

I just don't think it matters to them. How else would explain their support of her despite her opposition to Glass Steagall, support of fracking, support of NAFTA, rejects free college education, the Wall Street speeches, etc? These are facts that everyone is aware of, right?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is Elizabeth Warren s...