Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:46 AM Mar 2016

Hillary Clinton and Other Candidates on Counterterrorism






"Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate, offered a smart, substantive rebuttal to Republican bluster."


It didn’t take long for Tuesday’s terrorist attacks in Brussels to seep into the American presidential race. Predictably, the two leading Republicans called for severe measures against Muslims. Donald Trump also reiterated his faith in waterboarding suspected terrorists and Senator Ted Cruz said the police must “patrol and secure” Muslim neighborhoods.

While the fearmongering and bravado seem to work with part of the electorate, those approaches — including the unconstitutional singling out of a religious group — would endanger national security by straining relationships with allies and alienating Muslims.

Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate, offered a smart, substantive rebuttal to Republican bluster in a speech at Stanford University on Wednesday, when she laid out ways to work with allies to defeat terrorist groups and cautioned against responses driven by panic


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/24/opinion/hillary-clinton-and-other-candidates-on-counterterrorism.html?_r=0
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton and Other Candidates on Counterterrorism (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 OP
K & R Iliyah Mar 2016 #1
Any candidate which thinks strong encryption is something which should be compromised by the State JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #2
Thank you for your input though I do think your concerns should be ... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #3
That is actually not the public editor's responsibility JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #4

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
2. Any candidate which thinks strong encryption is something which should be compromised by the State
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:55 AM
Mar 2016

Does not understand 1) mathematics 2) 1st amendment.

Her national security credentials are tainted also by her support for the illegal patriot act.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
3. Thank you for your input though I do think your concerns should be ...
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

Thank you for your input though I do think your concerns should be shared with the New York Times Public Editor:


Margaret Sullivan, Public Editor
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018


I am glad to be of service and I would be remiss if I didn't thank you for kicking my thread,

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
4. That is actually not the public editor's responsibility
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

I have discussed issues with various articles with Ms. Sullivan but I can recognize that an editorial board opinion is well outside her purview. I have found her to be a wonderful public advocate and a kind person.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton and Other...