2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie is on Fire!!!!
Best speech I have heard him give. This is inspiring regardless of who you support. If you are not watching.... Get there!
dchill
(38,482 posts)He's on a roll!
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)Still talking about Flint. Shows what kind of candidate & person he truly is.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)Hillary mentioned it briefly.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)RandySF
(58,798 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Free clue: that's a rhetorical question.
I can provide a definition if you need it....
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)Aren't they used for hemorrhoids? I've seen them in stores, but never bought any.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Will wonders never cease.
DiehardLiberal
(580 posts)coyote
(1,561 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I actually tuned in, after swearing them off. I'm still cancelling Uverse. Lol.
But they did give him 5 min of good commentary after, before switching program lineup. Color me shocked and stunned.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I totally get it. I had to delete my first post I think, ever, today. Reading would have saved me. I failed, lol.
global1
(25,242 posts)If they did run it live in Washington - was it to keep the crowds down? Why go to the field if they could watch it on TV. Just saying - we're complementing MSNBC here - but they might have had a different motive to run it.
If Bernie was able to fill a 50,000 capacity stadium - that is history being made on the campaign trail. How could the other candidates compete with that?
Bernie has consistently filled the venues he has spoken at - all around the country. One thing that impresses me about him is that if there is an overflow area - he will always go out and personally appear to speak to them before he delivers his scheduled speech.
Go Bernie!!!
Feel the Bern!!!!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)The attempt would not surprise me.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)It's not just his usual stump speech. Or maybe I should say he's giving it in a different way. It's good.
glowing
(12,233 posts)They needed to get the differences in just in case they cut away for more of Trump farting from his face...
JudyM
(29,236 posts)now there's an image that will hang in the air.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)[..looks like a warm family gathering!!
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)and over the past week, the energy has been unbelievable.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Just try to emulate the West? No we bring to the country Bush's, that Voldermolt looking thing we have now, Charlie Christ as a Senate candidate, oh and let's not forget that lovely darling running the DNC into the ground, Miss Debbie herself. Let's not forget we also try wonderful things like FCAT testing for kids, kids to incarceration, and shoot everyone if your scared of your shadow type laws. So much wrong, where do we begin to make things right?
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)...he's running for a House seat.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)Saw him in person once and he has the weirdest eyes, they're sort of scary!
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Removing marijuana off federal crimes. Free education, free medical. Environment. And the rest of the Christmas lists items. Was Santa Claus jewish?
Hekate
(90,673 posts)On Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:10 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Let see he talked about wall street
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1577407
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Too close to anti-semitism for this board.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:20 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Dispicable response
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Was Santa Claus Jewish? This you call anti-Semitic? Oy! Alerter, get a life, and gey gezund!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Wow. No other candidate can talk this freely and honestly. Theyre all beholden toads.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Bernie One Note.
Bernie Panders.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)..because Hillary won't disrupt the gravy train.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It's the basic speech any candidate gives over and over.
However, I've watched any number of Bernie's speeches in recent weeks and they are far from exactly the same.
jillan
(39,451 posts)I've listened to almost all of his speeches and wow -
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)That's what it's all about
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I agree (as usual) with all of his proposals.
Oh, and I have to add this on edit (warped sense of humor)
virgista
(48 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)a little more Hillary bashing.
senseandsensibility
(17,026 posts)and always has new ideas in her speeches. She never bashes Bernie.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Definitely not in full length. 2) "Hillary bashing" ??? Really, I heard policy differences, I heard taking corporate monies. It wasn't "bashing" to point out differences in records. Bashing would be talking about emails, talking about Bill, talking about the unfair way in which DNC top officials seem to be just another Supe PAC for Hillary. If her record of choices she has made in the past and choices she has made in running her campaign are items that people don't like, it's not Bernie's fault.
How would people have reacted to Hillary's campaign if she had chosen to renounce her corporate friends, refuse speaking fees from Wall St the last couple of years, renounce super pacs? What if she had run as Bernie is now? Do you think there would be as many people ready to embrace Bernie across the country?
In "speaking fees, corporate friendliness", had she not taken money to go behind closed doors and give paid for private speaking engagements, no one would ask, can we see your transcripts? Can we see what you say to these wealthy, powerful, incredibly influential people within our system of government/ country when the cameras are off and the 99% aren't around? Would it sound similar to that 47% takers speech that Romney was caught on? The one where he was calling 47% of Americans moocher's and at the same time thought China's way of dealing with labor and environmental laws was just awesome (you know working 7 days a week, long hours, for little compensation, even living at the factory, stacked 4 to a bunk, locked behind barbed wires and gates was simply amazing.... Something he probably wishes he could do to those 47% he feels is stealing from him, even though he doesn't pay taxes? Do you think if America saw the transcripts, they would be pleased with what she had to say? If there was nothing to hide, then releasing transcripts of private events to the top 1% class shouldn't be a problem for the 99% to also hear/ see; right?
It may seem like "bashing" because he's pointing out these differences and how she's conducted her life in the public eye, as a private citizen for the past couple of years after she stepped down from SoS position, and the way in which she's running her campaign this time around. If people in party and in the country, in general, feel as if they are being lied to, pandered to, and having the deck stacked against them, it's definitely not Bernie who is doing these things. It is corporate money backers, it's Wall St, it's corporate media, it is powerful interest groups, and ultimately it is Hillary Clinton's choice to embrace the rigged system that hurts real people, that harms people in other countries with even less power or human rights than our own, and ultimately it harms this earth, this one planet we have to share as one of the many species that live on this planet, 3rd rock from the sun.
It doesn't make sense to continue on this destructive path! We are literally moving into mass extinction of the planet because a handful of people's around the world have amassed power, money, and control over the rest of the world. Engineering genocides, wars, slave labor conditions, poverty, food insecurities, lack of clean fresh water resources, polluted lands, creating fear, strife, and misery, and ultimately all for what? This country tomorrow could change direction if it wished to, and could help lead the way into creating harmony and appropriate actions to help our environment. Our congress could decide to cut the military budget from destructive bombs and killing machines, and decide to appropriate monies into using renewable energy sources. They could literally hire massive amounts of people to engineer mass transit, solar panels on every rooftop across America, wind turbines, geo-thermal. They could create subsidies to remove gas cars from the road and place electric cars onto the roads (along with funding and research in ways to reliably do this for countries across the planet). We could fund higher education and training. We could ensure that citizens have access to clean air, water, foods. Help younger generations learn and transform the way we produce sustainable food/ husbandry practices that don't erode our soil or add harmful chemicals into our lands, bodies and other species. We could make sure that health care is a fundamental right and that all people can access it without having to choose death because they lack financial resources. We could decide that Wall St is completely unnecessary for the human and planet condition; gambling on a large scale that harms the worldwide over and literally steals people's work labor by calling their speculation and theaft "investment". Do people really think someone like Trump or Romney or the Clintons work harder than the nurse, teacher, construction worker, even a fast food worker? NOPE!
Saying we can't or keeping the status quo in power doesn't work anymore. This world can't wait for patches around the edges. We need a radical shake up now! We need value in our environment and actual humanity to supersede someone's investment portfolio.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)glowing
(12,233 posts)sense at all.. Have a good day!
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)glowing
(12,233 posts)in Florida mind you, they say "why aren't you running for an election yourself"? AND then I tell them these are liberal, progressive, democratic ideals.. I'm left of the mainstream left. I don't think I could win an election in my red area. Ideas sound great, until broken down into party affiliation... BTW, I started out in VT, my whole family is still there. Guess the state just grows us good.. LOL
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)I've been here a while but I've realised I could put that time wasted on the endless, pointless arguments going on every day, and accomplishing nothing, to better use. As in volunteering.
Maybe when this campaign is over it'll be sensible around here. Hope so.
Bye Bye