2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Mailed Surrogate Caucus Forms To Her "Likely" Voters - So They Can Lie And Vote Easier
Story from Kos.
"Special Message from President Clinton. Enclosed with the letter was the Surrogate Affidavit Form for the 2016 Democratic Precinct Caucus. This form allows people who have schedule conflict due to religious observance or work, or a disability or illness to submit a caucus vote without attending.""
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/3/13/1500586/-Clinton-Campaign-Caucus-Conniving-in-Washington-State
So you can fill out the caucus forms if you are too lazy to caucus, and lie about the fact that you are too lazy to caucus.
No verification.
I think every single Clinton Surrogate Form should be challenged.
The person has to prove they had to go to work, or church, or had a doctor's appointment for their caucus vote to count.
This is beyond sick.
Anything to win right Hillary?
And to think every establishment Democrat here endorsed her, when Bernie is gonna smoke her in Washington State, playing fair and square.
RandySF
(59,767 posts)The caucus is being held during spring break not, but kids are not in school on Saturdays. So while Bernie supporters can spend x number of hours sitting and voting, others have to figure out what to do with their kids. Thank God I don't live in Washington because mine is sick.
dchill
(38,617 posts)were not around to vote. Generalizations are for a******s.
RandySF
(59,767 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Only c. 40% of millennials are in college. As younger workers, millennials are more likely to be working in precisely the sort of service-sector jobs that schedule people on weekends.
Hillary voters run (a lot) older, are more likely to be in careers that have a M-F work week (or are retired).
Um...what?
Since I doubt "others" are in any position to figure out what to do with your kids, I'll assume you were in so much of a hurry with this crap that, well...you see the result.
RandySF
(59,767 posts)And stop complaining about anyone else using them.
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Caucusing is different from voting.
Use them if you have a legitimate reason.
Caucusing is not voting.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)They call us entitled, while they still enjoy regular workweeks. Shameful projection!
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)If someone has to work, church, illness... Yeah OK... Who however Has to go to Church on Saturday other than those who are Jewish? Perfectly acceptable for Jews, for others... Christians certainly... Open To Question!
all american girl
(1,788 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)Millennials range from 18-33 years old.
The average age of first time parents in the US is 25 years old.
riversedge
(70,448 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)Only if you "can't" caucus.
Not because you are too low energy to go down there and actually caucus.
riversedge
(70,448 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Oh dear.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Oh, if someone wants to make vote voting harder they can resurrect poll taxes, grandfather clauses, and tests, hmmmm.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Is that what Democrats do nowadays?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)If you can't do fifty military push ups you can't vote.
Tarc
(10,478 posts)and you immediately jump to "they're gonna use em for deceptive purposes!"
all american girl
(1,788 posts)I was unable to participate. I think this is great. Some of us don't have the ability to be part of the process because of outside forces. I'm not getting why this is a bad thing. Aren't we all Dems...we like MORE people part of the game, not less.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)riversedge
(70,448 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)Despicable.
riversedge
(70,448 posts)your camp a favor.
brooklynite
(94,974 posts)"you can get a form allowing someone else to vote for you."
http://washingtonforberniesanders.com/how-to-become-a-delegate-for-bernie-sanders
NanceGreggs
(27,821 posts)... that would be yet another example of Bernie's campaign not knowing what they're doing.
By NOT reminding their supporters that they can still vote if personal attendance isn't possible, the Bernie campaign is just being - uh, stupid.
Renew Deal
(81,899 posts)Maybe that's why they're losing so badly.
NanceGreggs
(27,821 posts)It's like everything about running a campaign is news to these people.
Yallow
(1,926 posts)About having to work, or being sick?
Caucus, or don't vote.
We are a caucus state, not an absentee ballot voting primary state.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)MineralMan
(146,351 posts)Bernie's campaign didn't send those surrogate ballots to their supporters. Hillary's did. That's unfair. Her campaign should have checked with Bernie's campaign before sending them out, you see.
Or something...
floriduck
(2,262 posts)by March 18 or they are invalid. So all this debate is now old news and over. Whatever happens, happens.
MineralMan
(146,351 posts)I suppose we'll hear the results from Washington later today. I'll check them out later. I have to do some work.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I'm keeping this bookmarked for the next time a Sanders supporter complains about voter suppression.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)it out with the state and am happy because those who can't go can still participate. I'm caucusing for Bernie, but doing it by mail is a good option.
I had no idea this was possible until I got this mail and have good other people about it that can't or would not attend in person. Thanks, Bill!
The mail was a letter from Bill and a form with nothing filled out. I could easily check the Bernie big, but decided to go in person.
Do you think all the Bernie ones should also be thrown out?
Yallow
(1,926 posts)If someone truly can't caucus use the form.
Every single registered Democrat didn't get them.
See a problem here?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)DURHAM D
(32,617 posts)The Clinton campaign did not yet have the data on "Leaning Sanders" loaded into Van so the Sanders campaign could not do a targeted mailing.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Do you guys really just need your hand held the entire primary or something?
NanceGreggs
(27,821 posts)Next primary - no amateurs!
riversedge
(70,448 posts)Renew Deal
(81,899 posts)You're mad Bernie didn't think of it.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)I was for Obama last time, so it wouldn't be from previous Hillary support either.
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Not a letter making it easy to "say" I can't attend.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)On the day of the caucus to still participate.
Not sure why I would receive one and you wouldn't.
Maybe gender or demographics?
If so, that still wouldn't necessarily advantage Hillary here.
Look at The Stranger's endorsements. Even though they endorsed both candidates, they noted all the women on their board endorsed Sanders.
msongs
(67,498 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)Without a legitimate reason.
For some, rules do still apply.
riversedge
(70,448 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)"This form allows people who have schedule conflict due to religious observance or work, or a disability or illness to submit a caucus vote without attending."
And I don't have to lie, or hold my nose to vote.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Good lord!
NanceGreggs
(27,821 posts)... that under the rules of their state's caucus, they can still vote if they have a legitimate reason for not attending in person is - what? How is this "anything to win"?
Is she saying, "Fill out the form if you DON'T have a valid reason"?
What about Bernie supporters who file the form? Should they all be challenged as well?
Apparently the Surrogate Affidavit Form is perfectly acceptable UNDER THE RULES as they stand.
Tell me, are there ANY rules in any state that Bernie supporters don't want changed - from coin tosses in Iowa to calling for NY to be an open primary?
RandySF
(59,767 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)supporters always find a way to point the finger back to Bernie. If they don't SEE this for what it is, they never will.
I know what happened to my daughter and son here in FL so to me THIS is just another "way" they do things. It is what it is and keeping blinders on does help help in some way I guess.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)They can't grasp that the fact that he isn't is a big part of the appeal...
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Bernie could have sold out.
Others did right?
The bigger the slime, the smaller the revolution.
Millions understand.
HRC fans, not so much....
nenagh
(1,925 posts)Thank you
riversedge
(70,448 posts)Bernie camp. Instead, Hillary supporters get another Hit piece from a Bernie supporter who obviously does not know--the WA caucus rules.
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Rules.
RandySF
(59,767 posts)We can talk about reports of people driving to New Hampshire trying to vote for Bernie.
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Did you?
RandySF
(59,767 posts)riversedge
(70,448 posts)Renew Deal
(81,899 posts)1. Is this process available to all Democratic voters?
2. How do you want to verify that people have a conflict? Police?
3. Why shouldn't people use this process if they have a conflict?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)That's not the way it worked.
There was lots of trouble even getting the vote builder for the Bernie folks here I heard from my district leaders.
They (The DNC) have an anchor on the scale.
I should have mentioned this in the op the vote builder problems.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It seems that Clinton's campaign took the initiative and mailed forms to her supporters. Why didn't Sanders do the same?
all american girl
(1,788 posts)your problem is with the state Dems....but not Hillary. More Dems participating is a good thing.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)This just good ground game politics.
ReallyIAmAnOptimist
(357 posts)... A lot of unqualified forms will go unchallenged.
I'll be looking to verify that two qualified forms are indeed in our precinct packet tomorrow (from neighbors who are working). If they're not there I'll be reporting that to the chair, and the voters.
Looking forward to Super Saturday!
riversedge
(70,448 posts)--are willing to use it to benefit your candidate. Interesting.
................
MFM008
(19,836 posts)and I NEVER received such a thing. Didn't happen and I've donated so they would likely send me such a thing, We could vote by absentee that's it, quit trying to stir crap up.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)Her turn...
People keep forgetting this...
By hook or crook...
RandySF
(59,767 posts)People had trouble voting in Arizona and everyone on DU is understandably outraged. Washington Democratic Party tries to make it easier to participate and now we have more complaints. WTF?
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)I don't think the Democratic Party establishment or Corporatacrats are going to like the answer to that, either short-term or long-term.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)They're the same forms for Sanders voters too. Jesus,hysterical paranoia goes into high gear.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"I really don't know the rules of the Iowa caucus."
You should consider deleting this.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Yougeeee events. Voters do have a responsibility to be informed, learn the rules, and get out and vote in time or mail their ballots in time. Campaigns are responsible for getting as much beneficial information as possible to their supporters.
brooklynite
(94,974 posts)...I'm not sure his staff is on their game.
brooklynite
(94,974 posts)Cognitive psychology tells us that our minds tend to attach more strongly to ideas that enter first. The former President's letter therefore sets in place the notion of voting immediately by mail for Hillary. And it makes it easy to do so by providing the form. When they actually fill out the form, voters will have to claim a condition they might not have. But now they are inclined to vote. Perhaps they might fit those conditions a little bit, enough to talk themselves into it. And I think it's likely that some number of voters are annoyed by the caucus process in the first place. (Washington State also has a non-caucus vote, a non delegate, meaningless contest, just because there has already been pressure to move away from caucus voting.) A voter thinks, "Darn caucus. I have a right to vote, so I'm using this form that Bill and Hillary have so conveniently given me." Its obvious that the Party does not have an enforcement mechanism for evaluating the truthfulness of surrogate voters. Cheating is easy when you have the form and encouragement in hand.
So, the factual reasons under which a surrogate ballot can be used are presented, but the armchair psychologist has decided that the intent is to "plant" the idea that it can be used otherwise. I'm amazed that he didn't claim that this was influencing behavior by being labeled as coming from "President" Clinton.
brooklynite
(94,974 posts)http://washingtonforberniesanders.com/how-to-become-a-delegate-for-bernie-sanders
Never mind.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)The more people have access to voting the better. There is nothing sacred about going to the polls! If I remember correctly the repubs caucused on line in ID or UT.
Imagine if all Bernie folks would have voted by mail in AZ he instead of waiting in line, he may have won.
KellyW
(598 posts)This is something I actually know a lot about. I have been on the WA Dems State committee that drafts our delegate selection rules for decades. Some here may remember me as a long term campaigner to ditch the caucus in favor of the presidential primary that WA holds, but our party doesnt use.
We expanded the use of surrogate affidavits this year. IIRC, in the past a Democratic voter had to request a surrogate affidavit form from the state party. The main resistance to allowing wide use of surrogate affidavits over the years has been the fear that campaigns would do exactly what HRC has, preprint the form and mass mail them.
My wife received one of these forms from the HRC campaign. I looked at this mailing and sighed. I had mailed my daughters surrogate affidavit a few days earlier. She is a student and attends university on the other side of the state. BTW, the surrogate affidavit does not say that school is a valid reason to use it. I joked to her that I could have put her affidavit (for Bernie) in the HRC envelope so her campaign could have paid the postage.
But, lest anyone think that the HRC campaign was so smart, and the Bernie campaign so deficient HRC blew this one, at least in the case of my household. The surrogate affidavit needed to be returned to the state party not later than March 18th the mailing from HRC arrived to us way too late to get mail back to Seattle in time.
MineralMan
(146,351 posts)If not, why not? People decide for themselves whether they can or cannot attend caucus meetings. There is no verification process for such surrogate votes.
Maybe Bernie's campaign should have done the same thing. Maybe it did. Do you know?