Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 06:01 PM Mar 2016

Taking a trip back to 2008, Hillary got more than 60%

in Arkansas, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Puerto Rico.

After today, Sanders will have gotten more than 60% in Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Utah, Kansas, Minnesota, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. Hell, he will have gotten more than 70% in Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Utah, and Vermont!

I find this interesting and ominous.

It's ominous that so many people in so many states are looking at Hillary and going "nope," but she's still being treated like the presumptive nominee.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taking a trip back to 2008, Hillary got more than 60% (Original Post) XemaSab Mar 2016 OP
Ominous why? dchill Mar 2016 #1
Learn to count delegates, that will help you. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #2
She's being treated as the presumptive nominee because.....math UMTerp01 Mar 2016 #3
Math is showing right now that some US states don't want the front runner by a large margin... Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #40
did you miss her sweep of the south? bigtree Mar 2016 #43
is that what you call it? Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #46
you won't get far with that untruth bigtree Mar 2016 #47
Demographics Trenzalore Mar 2016 #4
States like Alaska, Idaho, and Kansas? XemaSab Mar 2016 #6
Care to enlighten me on Bernie's minority outreach in KS nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #7
As a person who cacused in Kansas Sky Masterson Mar 2016 #10
My point was Trenzalore Mar 2016 #11
That wasn't your point at all Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #21
Don't get mad at me Trenzalore Mar 2016 #23
Your dishonesty didn't make me mad Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #24
Getting mad at people on the internet is unhealthy nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #27
Indeed. AlbertCat Mar 2016 #41
You failed to mention.. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #13
what is wrong with being a white liberal? Also those with high incomes tend to back her over Bernie JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #29
Nothing wrong with it Trenzalore Mar 2016 #30
He split the difference 49-49 with Latinos in Illinois. And I hear Native Americans love him too. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #31
Math says she is the nominee. nt onehandle Mar 2016 #5
Tell that to Bernie when we nominate him Vincardog Mar 2016 #8
Absolute fantasy. onehandle Mar 2016 #9
In 30 minutes, Hawaii will be caucusing Live Bait Mar 2016 #12
Arizona wasn't close Trenzalore Mar 2016 #20
How come the only exit poll I could find regarding Arizona showed Live Bait Mar 2016 #22
Does your exit poll include early voting nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #26
That is rascist bs. You are saying my vote doesn't count. Why do you hate voters? Vincardog Mar 2016 #14
I love voters! 2.5 million+ plus more voted for the nominee! onehandle Mar 2016 #15
Me too let's look at the counts in a month Vincardog Mar 2016 #17
I heard that last month. And the month before that. nt onehandle Mar 2016 #18
What is that I hear? Is it whistling? Are we going past the graveyard? Vincardog Mar 2016 #19
We specifically told you after March 15th, the schedule shifts to Bernie Live Bait Mar 2016 #25
what nominee? There is no nominee yet. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #35
Where did your interlocutor mention race? DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #16
incorrect ibegurpard Mar 2016 #39
And of course the Southern States where Clinton got 60%+ don't count... brooklynite Mar 2016 #28
Here. You need any more? Wilms Mar 2016 #33
Am I to understand that this thread is just for Sanders supporters? brooklynite Mar 2016 #34
I only get around so much, so I may not have seen those opinions. Wilms Mar 2016 #38
My point was that the "losing" candidate is still kicking ass XemaSab Mar 2016 #36
did you say the same after MI bigtree Mar 2016 #45
shes winning states Obama won last time Mary Mac Mar 2016 #32
I try not to describe the primary in such stark racial terms... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #37
she was better liked and not universally distrusted in 2008. Vote2016 Mar 2016 #42
She was not even viable in VT. No front runner in a 2 person race morningfog Mar 2016 #44

Avalon Sparks

(2,565 posts)
40. Math is showing right now that some US states don't want the front runner by a large margin...
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:10 PM
Mar 2016

That is concerning...

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
47. you won't get far with that untruth
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:10 AM
Mar 2016
Georgia
Hillary Clinton 543,008 71.3%
Bernie Sanders 214,332 28.2

Florida
Hillary Clinton 1,097,400 64.4%
Bernie Sanders 566,603 33.3

Arkansas
Hillary Clinton 144,580 66.3%
Bernie Sanders 64,868 29.7

Alabama
Hillary Clinton 309,928 77.8%
Bernie Sanders 76,399 19.2

Louisiana
Hillary Clinton 221,615 71.1%
Bernie Sanders 72,240 23.2

North Carolina
Hillary Clinton 616,383 54.6%
Bernie Sanders 460,316 40.8

Virginia
Hillary Clinton 503,358 64.3%
Bernie Sanders 275,507 35.2

South Carolina
Hillary Clinton 271,514 73.5%
Bernie Sanders 95,977 26.0

Tennessee
Hillary Clinton 245,304 66.1%
Bernie Sanders 120,333 32.4

Texas
Hillary Clinton 935,080 65.2%
Bernie Sanders 475,561 33.2

Mississippi
Hillary Clinton 182,447 82.6%
Bernie Sanders 36,348 16.5

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
10. As a person who cacused in Kansas
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 06:29 PM
Mar 2016

Nobody reached out to me.
If you don't care enough to show up and vote for a candidate than you aren't inspired by them.
Hillary has a built in base that both likes her and dislike her. The "dislike her" is the prevailing choice here.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
11. My point was
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

Any state that does not have a large minority population tends to favor Sanders. Sanders doesn't do well in states that have diversity.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
21. That wasn't your point at all
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:05 PM
Mar 2016

You actually said, "states that don't have large populations of white privileged liberals vote for Hillary."

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
41. Indeed.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:54 PM
Mar 2016

"You actually said, "states that don't have large populations of white privileged liberals vote for Hillary.""
States with large conservative populations vote for Hillary. Maybe that's what was meant.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
13. You failed to mention..
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 06:35 PM
Mar 2016

You failed to mention that Secretary Clinton garnered 65% of the vote in the 2nd and 3rd most populous state in the union and those two states are also two of the most heterogeneous states in the union as well, am I right?

You also failed to mention more people live in South Florida than Idaho, Kansas, and Alaska combined, am I right?


So far six of the most populous states in the union have voted and Secretary Clinton has won five of them, three by double digits, am I right?






JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
29. what is wrong with being a white liberal? Also those with high incomes tend to back her over Bernie
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:15 PM
Mar 2016

so much for privileged backing Bernie..

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
30. Nothing wrong with it
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:18 PM
Mar 2016

Just saying he hasn't been able to appeal much outside of one demographic. Maybe he'll do better in April.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
31. He split the difference 49-49 with Latinos in Illinois. And I hear Native Americans love him too.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:21 PM
Mar 2016

Arab-Americans in Michigan (the largest community in the US) overwhelmingly voted Bernie. There are more demographics than black and white.

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/09/bernie-sanders-won-americas-largest-arab-community-by-being-open-to-them/

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
12. In 30 minutes, Hawaii will be caucusing
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

It will also confirm what we knew about the West: It is Bernie's.

Arizona was a complete fuckup of epic proportions. It is also sending quite a loud message when Clinton didn't even support the petition to fix the problem. She was satisfied with the results. I am not. I consider Arizona Bernie's.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
20. Arizona wasn't close
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:05 PM
Mar 2016

and the area that had the problems are we she was outperforming. People stood in line, to vote for her.

The problem with Arizona was caused when the Voting Rights Act was struck down by the Supreme Court and the republicans there could determine where to put polling places without approval.

 

Live Bait

(93 posts)
25. We specifically told you after March 15th, the schedule shifts to Bernie
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

and will remain there for quite some time.

By then New York and Pennsylvania will have agreed along with Alaska and Washington that Clinton isn't worth their time or efforts.

Arizona's massive fuckup made sure of that. And people *ARE* checking their voting ID's and making sure that they are properly registered, and bitching if their registration was changed.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
16. Where did your interlocutor mention race?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 06:40 PM
Mar 2016
Absolute fantasy.

See you in states with huuuuuge populations of Democrats.

-onehandle




Thank you in advance.

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
34. Am I to understand that this thread is just for Sanders supporters?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:07 PM - Edit history (1)

The OP made an assertion that seemed inconsisten with the opinions that Sanders folks have made about RED States that Clinton has won, and I returned the favor.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
38. I only get around so much, so I may not have seen those opinions.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

What I did see was an article that said quite clearly that Sanders needed to do really well in the north to neutralize Clinton's performance in the south.

On that thread, a prolific poster protested the OP claiming that it suggested the southern votes were only worth 3/5 a piece. And that logic turned into an incredible shit-storm that challenged the RAM of anyone logged into it.

And now, it seems, it has been managed and turned into a meme that Sanders supporters view Southerners as 3/5 a human. African American Southerners in particular.

You know what I smell? That's why I snarkly asked if you wanted to throw gas and a match on a bag filled with dog poop left on DU's doorstep.

That's not you, BKite. Not here, not in the real world. Despite our differences I have every faith you are better than that. Please don't prove me wrong.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
36. My point was that the "losing" candidate is still kicking ass
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:37 PM
Mar 2016

and that's a problem for the establishment.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
45. did you say the same after MI
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:33 PM
Mar 2016

...when she swept five states?

Ohio, NC, Illinois, Florida, and Missouri?

Mary Mac

(323 posts)
32. shes winning states Obama won last time
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:25 PM
Mar 2016

And losing the Caucasian caucuses that she won last time. Seesaw.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
37. I try not to describe the primary in such stark racial terms...
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:41 PM
Mar 2016

But what we are witnessing is a reprise of 2008 with demographics being a much better predictor of results than momentum.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
44. She was not even viable in VT. No front runner in a 2 person race
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:32 PM
Mar 2016

has ever been non viable anywhere. She did not even get 15%.

In the most recent 3 states she didn't win a single county.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Taking a trip back to 200...