Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

concreteblue

(626 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:59 PM Mar 2016

Bernie bashing masquarading as concern trolling:

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/1/26/berned-out-why-this-millennial-wont-be-supporting-bernie-sanders-in-the-primary-election

Will not quote, but be warned this is a mishmash of Clinton campaign talking points masquerading as concern for the country/ Democratic Party. The funny part is on the "Rules" page they claim they are all for open honest discussion, but a intensive reading of the comments show only pro author and pro Hillary views, with much "will not be tolerated" language from said commenters, sandwiched around deleted comments.
Here is mine:
"

Wow. Nobody light a match. So many strawmen in this room the whole place will go up like, well, a room full of specious arguments. I will try to address them in the order of appearance.
"than Senator Sanders willfully having Congress enact his entire agenda. "
Nobody, especially not Senator Sanders, has said Congress will "willfully enact his entire agenda".
" However, the ramification from this idea seems to be something that
Sanders hasn't fully conceived. For example, to break up the big banks
sounds good and well but what happens to the customers of those banks
that rely on them for their savings accounts? What about small
businesses that rely on those banks for loans? What about homeowners
who pay a mortgage through the bank? Are all these accounts then
shifted toward community banks? If so, which ones? What if this new
bank is far away from someone's home or business? "
WHich parts of the country went without phone service when ATT was broken up? No, I'll wait......
College tuition? Completely addressed and answered. THe author is either completely ignorant or lying. Which is it?
" At a time where the uninsured rate is at a record low,
it makes zero sense to scrap the entire system and start anew yet
Sanders is insistent that this is the only option we as a country have
to improve our health care system. "
Addressed in the second debate thoroughly. Nobody, especially not Senator Sanders, has mentioned "Scrapping the system entirely".
Gun control issue: He "only recently" changed his position. Really???!! From Camp weathervane???? Give me a fuhqin break!
Lastly: How is Hillary's campaign anything but a wishlist of things she would like to accomplish? Do you really think the CONs will suyddenly see the error of their ways and want to work with her? She will be lucky if she is not impeached before she takes the oath of office.
Really, if this is the best the Clintonites can do, do us all a favor and give up. As a matter of fact, I call on all of you to urge Ms Clinton to drop out of the race. It is surely over as evidenced by the clumsy desperation exhibited here. It is for the good of the Country.
I would have to resign in embarrassment if it was my job to write such drivel."

Did not last an hour.
Just another bunch of thin-skinned Clintonites lying about Bernie......
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie bashing masquarading as concern trolling: (Original Post) concreteblue Mar 2016 OP
Don't like criticism of Sanders? hrmjustin Mar 2016 #1
Criticism is fine. concreteblue Mar 2016 #5
Seems more like you can't handle criticism from what you wrote. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #6
What criticism? concreteblue Mar 2016 #8
Your use of Camp weathervane when discussing Sanders flip flop on the gun issue. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #10
Care to try to prove concreteblue Mar 2016 #11
By your logic then Sanders is a hypocrite everytime he goes after Clinton on a flip flop. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #14
Not really. concreteblue Mar 2016 #15
Your hypocrisy is noted. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #16
As is your bias and blinders. Good day to you too. concreteblue Mar 2016 #17
Criticism from an asshole troll who was banned from DU? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #12
Unrec. for source. n/t demmiblue Mar 2016 #2
That site is persona non grata here anyway... n/t JimDandy Mar 2016 #3
It is a thing today for someone on your side to critique stuff for everyone else upaloopa Mar 2016 #4
Uh, No. concreteblue Mar 2016 #9
Seem to be you and some others try to mitigate the damage of upaloopa Mar 2016 #19
Any "damage" done concreteblue Mar 2016 #20
Hillary surrogate shills for Hillary. Maedhros Mar 2016 #7
Ignore that troll, he was banned from DU and is a lying hack. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #13
Thanks for the info.... concreteblue Mar 2016 #18

concreteblue

(626 posts)
5. Criticism is fine.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:12 PM
Mar 2016

I am not calling them out for criticizing, I am calling them out not only for lying and being hypocrites. Your response tells me you don't know the difference.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
10. Your use of Camp weathervane when discussing Sanders flip flop on the gun issue.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:25 PM
Mar 2016

And give yourself some credit, your snark is excellent.

concreteblue

(626 posts)
11. Care to try to prove
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:27 PM
Mar 2016

that the usage of the flip flop argument is NOT ultimate hypocrisy from the Clinton camp?
And thank you. Yes, I am rather good at it.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
14. By your logic then Sanders is a hypocrite everytime he goes after Clinton on a flip flop.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:29 PM
Mar 2016

Goes both ways.

concreteblue

(626 posts)
15. Not really.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:31 PM
Mar 2016

If flip flopping on issues was a signature move for Bernie, then yeah. But it is not. That is Hillary's signature move. But nice try. There is a participation trophy with your name on it in the Lobby...(Sorry, gotta stay in practice!)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
12. Criticism from an asshole troll who was banned from DU?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:27 PM
Mar 2016

SpamDan is a nasty lying scumbag troll who's the laughingstock of DU.


upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
4. It is a thing today for someone on your side to critique stuff for everyone else
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

I use to get that in Catholic school. It was called the index. Some priest or other who couldn't be swayed by the devil read all the books and saw all the movies that were bad and made a list of what we didn't need to see. He took the bullet for the rest of us you see.

The problem with setting yourself up as a censor for everyone else is you call attention to the bad stuff and that just makes it more desirable to see.

concreteblue

(626 posts)
9. Uh, No.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:24 PM
Mar 2016

I posted the link so anybody who cared could read it. I then posted my critique because the cowards at the site deleted it.
It really is that simple. Even a Hillaryite can understand it.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
19. Seem to be you and some others try to mitigate the damage of
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:42 PM
Mar 2016

these articles. I posted a thing about group dynamics as a part of my idea.

If you can build the majority opinion early enough you rule

concreteblue

(626 posts)
20. Any "damage" done
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:59 PM
Mar 2016

Is only in the mind of the author and any followers of Hillary too weak minded to do their own research. I posted a factual point by point refutation and the cowards at the site deleted it. Nuff said.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie bashing masquaradi...