Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
7. ...and Don't want to run with a Democratic Socialist at the Top of the Ticket
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:07 AM
Mar 2016

inviting million of dollars of advertising to be used against them using the S word and probably the C word against them

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
2. I don't think he really even believes that
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:42 AM
Mar 2016

He just needs a rationale to keep going as the math becomes more and more problematic

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
3. Who need voters. Us!
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:46 AM
Mar 2016

Money from special interests doesn't matter when you have a pattern of voting against the people that chose the candidate opposite of that. And a challenger representative of the people's interests will put boots on the ground and money in that campaign, causing a serious problem for any elected official seeking re-election.

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
4. No, his problem is that they won't flip unless he's ahead.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:48 AM
Mar 2016

The Super Delegates are a simple issue. They will vote for the candidate with the most earned delegates. If Sanders comes into the convention with a sizable lead in earned delegates, then the Supers and the Party will support him.

If Hillary wins the majority of earned delegates, then the Party will elect her. The candidate who won the most earned delegates, state by state, should be the nominee.

speaktruthtopower

(800 posts)
6. If that was the case..
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:00 AM
Mar 2016

they would have waited for at least a few primaries before committing to her.

The truth is she was seen as inevitable, and they saw it as smart politics to be early in line to curry favor with her team.

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
11. My post didn't speculate on what the Super Delegates thought in the past. I'm predicting the future.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:28 PM
Mar 2016

Your speculation on why the SDs did what they did in the past sounds reasonable and may be correct. It wasn't what I said, though. I'm talking about what the SDs will do in the future. I believe that they will eventually cast their votes for the candidate who comes into the convention with the most earned delegates.

In other words, I doubt very much that any of the Super Delegates want to be perceived as backing a candidate other than the one who receives the most popular votes, state by state. So we can take them out of the equation. Bernie is not going to succeed in "flipping" them unless he wins the majority of earned delegates, and at the same time, as Bernie supporters here often point out, the Super Delegates are largely irrelevant in the delegate count to date. I discount them from the totals of each candidate.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. Or they prefer an actual member of the Democratic Party to a late-joiner.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)
[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie's Problem with Fli...