Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

courseofhistory

(801 posts)
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 05:56 PM Oct 2012

Do Businessmen Make Good Presidents?

http://electoral-vote.com/

Since the start of the 20th Century, only three Presidents have been voted out of office after a single term. All three, Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter, and George H.W. Bush, were businessmen. It is startling but true that GDP has grown 45 times faster under Presidents with little or no business experience than when these businessmen were in office. The Presidents who had the best stock market growth, FDR, Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton, and Obama had essentially no business experience. The Dow has gained 16.8% per annum under Democrats with no business experience and lost 3.7% per year under Republicans with business experience. It is not clear why having business experience makes you a bad President; most likely there is no correlation between the business experience of the President and his performance on the economy.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
1. CEO's probably not
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 05:58 PM
Oct 2012

They are tasked at making money for a small group of people - investors or employees. A President needs to have winners all around - that is death for a CEO.

gopiscrap

(23,765 posts)
2. No not at all
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:00 PM
Oct 2012

All business is evil and at direct odds to the common good. The only noble professions are those of working for the church or state or some limited non-profits. How can you expect a business prick to care about the rest of the nation?

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
3. All business is not evil - a little sweeping judgement there maybe?
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:02 PM
Oct 2012

A CEO may not make a good president, but casting all business as evil is a bit much

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,716 posts)
7. I Thought Sweeping Generalizations Were The Province Of The Right
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:10 PM
Oct 2012

It's not about having money. It's about how you earned it and what you did with it.

yellowcanine

(35,702 posts)
4. George W. Bush had 2 terms but was supposedly a business man also....
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:03 PM
Oct 2012

I would say he is one more strike against the premise.

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
9. First he is was in the navy from 1943 through 1953.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:26 PM
Oct 2012

Then he was a farmer.

Not the same thing as being a "business man". Like I said, President Carter would find this OP a big laugh.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,716 posts)
10. I Agree With You.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:29 PM
Oct 2012

He also was a nuclear engineer.He was a Sunday School teacher. He was a multi layered person.

AJH032

(1,124 posts)
6. Saying a successful business person has a good understanding of the economy
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:09 PM
Oct 2012

is like saying any consumer good at finding deals in the market has a solid understanding of the economy.

The two sides are simply filling their roles in our multi-market macroeconomy. Being good at your role does not mean you understand predominant macroeconomic forces and how to influence a positive change as president.

JI7

(89,279 posts)
11. not in itself , Being President means not doing things like a Business Person would do
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:34 PM
Oct 2012

Carter had a bunch of other experience than the peanut farmer thing. and he was right on many things which if he had been re-elected and able to do and we could have avoided Reagan we would be a lot better off today.

Bush was always backed by people associated with his dad. everything he did was because of his name and family connections. from his business to being President. but i odn't think he was ever directly in charge .

treestar

(82,383 posts)
12. No, because the Presidency is not the running of a business
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:36 PM
Oct 2012

It is directing the Executive Branch of the federal government, which includes foreign policy, which cannot be conducted like a business.

The idea they understand the economy is silly - they understand their company and that's about it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Do Businessmen Make Good ...