Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:17 PM Apr 2016

Bernie's defense for not releasing tax returns: "we've been busy."

That would explain last year's tax returns, but not any of the old ones, which presumably are sitting in a file somewhere.

Hillary released hers last summer.

So what's up, Bernie?

https://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/sanders-defends-not-releasing-last-8-years-of-tax-returns-my-wife-does-them-and-weve-been-a-bit-busy/

Appearing on CNN’s State of The Union, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders stalled off questions about releasing his income taxes for the past eight years, saying his wife does them and “we’ve been a little bit busy lately.”

Host Jake Tapper pointed out that rival Hillary Clinton has posted her returns for the last eight years online — leading to considerable criticism about her income — but Sanders has yet to post his.


“I’m kind of surprised that you haven’t gone further on transparency. You released the summary page of your 2014 tax returns,” Tapper said. “Hillary Clinton has posted on her website the last eight years of her personal returns, all of the returns. Before the New York primary will you match her? Will you post your full returns for the last eight years?”

Sanders averred, saying his wife was responsible for their taxes and that there wasn’t anything “exciting” in them.

SNIP



80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie's defense for not releasing tax returns: "we've been busy." (Original Post) pnwmom Apr 2016 OP
Obfuscating in it's best form...... Little Star Apr 2016 #1
Sure Hillary has been busy passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #31
Jane has plenty of time. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #2
Tell whoever to talk to the Turbo tax people Skink Apr 2016 #3
I use turbo tax and it allows you to save your tax returns as pdf files Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #10
Ok but I have trouble remembering my password Skink Apr 2016 #37
Perhaps they don't take that option dflprincess Apr 2016 #51
Kinda weak, passing the buck to Jane BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #4
From a purely political perspective I wonder if this issue has wheels. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #9
Not sure BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #36
His supporters don't care but it might prevent him from getting new ones. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #38
Very astute BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #42
he should have added "go to opensource.com like a real reporter would do" Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #5
Full financial disclosures for people who say he's HIDING something: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #6
You should put that link in a stand alone OP for those who are deeply concerned and Autumn Apr 2016 #53
Done! Here's the link: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #55
release the transcripts timmymoff Apr 2016 #7
That takes some nerve, considering we are still waiting on the Wall St speech transcripts. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #8
I wonder what he doesn't want people to know about in the last 8 years? pnwmom Apr 2016 #11
Oh yes, I shudder at the thought...perhaps his net worth finally topped $1 million? silvershadow Apr 2016 #13
She got $200K from Burlington College when they forced her out pnwmom Apr 2016 #14
I didn't realize "she" was running. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #19
Her income is part of his return, and he benefited from that payout too. pnwmom Apr 2016 #21
meh, it's just a desperate red herring. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #24
about hc's returns questionseverything Apr 2016 #32
That article says they DID disclose, in the tax returns that were just released. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #41
yes, and they don't match earlier required financial disclosures questionseverything Apr 2016 #43
I have no problem with them donating directly to the foundation. pnwmom Apr 2016 #44
not directly...first thru the LLC she forgot to disclose questionseverything Apr 2016 #45
She's released all the info and it's clear they have plenty of money pnwmom Apr 2016 #46
i thought they were dead broke a couple years ago questionseverything Apr 2016 #57
A couple of years ago? More like 15. Plenty of time to build their assets. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #58
Are you sure they sold? Diocese (seller) reduced obligation by over a million $. snowy owl Apr 2016 #20
The possibly fraudulent part was claiming that she had millions in a multi-yr donation pnwmom Apr 2016 #22
Was that fraud or belief? snowy owl Apr 2016 #25
She reported the money as donations over a set period of time, pnwmom Apr 2016 #65
I agree. . . and so? snowy owl Apr 2016 #79
And so they had to pay her off $200K to break her contract, and it would be reported in those pnwmom Apr 2016 #80
It was not marked down as a loss -- the property was actually sold for LESS than its value karynnj Apr 2016 #30
No, the college is still there karynnj Apr 2016 #29
The college did not sell the property for a loss karynnj Apr 2016 #23
So Jane was visionary but needed time to see that vision materialize. snowy owl Apr 2016 #26
Visionary doesn't include listing future bequests as current donations. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #67
Since we don't know the details . . . hard to say snowy owl Apr 2016 #72
There has been plenty of coverage in the Vermont media, but not national coverage. pnwmom Apr 2016 #73
Well that wasn't smart. I understand her belief the money would come but it was a bad decision. snowy owl Apr 2016 #78
"he's looking into it"....give him at least 58 days... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #12
One of least wealthy in Congress? What's there to see? snowy owl Apr 2016 #15
For one thing, Jane reportedly got a $200K payout when she was pnwmom Apr 2016 #16
$200,000 - is that a lot in politics? I don't think so. What do you think about bank pay offs? snowy owl Apr 2016 #28
She was not ousted for financial mismanagement and the $200K payout is karynnj Apr 2016 #33
By this time in 2012, even Mitt had released his most recently completed tax return. DesertRat Apr 2016 #17
Mitt would also have tax people to do this for him. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #34
I'm sure they can hire an accountant DesertRat Apr 2016 #39
He said Jane does their taxes. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #40
So now he's putting the blame on his wife DesertRat Apr 2016 #47
How is he blaming her? She's with him on the campaign trial passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #48
Why didn't she release all the old ones a long time ago? They should have been pnwmom Apr 2016 #64
Who says? passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #71
I haven't been paying attention to Brock. I've been doing my own taxes, pnwmom Apr 2016 #75
Maybe that's why he rushed her off the stage Renew Deal Apr 2016 #59
I think that I will lurk every morning sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #18
I am sure he is looking into it Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #27
He needs to release them or lose my vote LoveIsNow Apr 2016 #35
No but he's a yuuuge hypocrite for demanding transparency for everyone else geek tragedy Apr 2016 #50
His full financial disclosures since his first term in Congress... phleshdef Apr 2016 #49
Bernie Sanders is no John Kerry. Kerry released 20 years of full tax returns. pnwmom Apr 2016 #54
No, what I'm saying is in direct opposition to the argument Romney made. phleshdef Apr 2016 #56
No, you implied Kerry only released his Senate disclosure forms, and not his tax returns, pnwmom Apr 2016 #61
No I did not imply that. But perhaps I wasn't being clear. phleshdef Apr 2016 #62
The disclosures provide very different information and aren't a substitute. nt pnwmom Apr 2016 #63
Not very different. The disclosures provide things tax returns don't and vice versa. phleshdef Apr 2016 #66
The disclosure forms, for example, list large RANGES, not precise figures. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #68
Really? Got proof of that? phleshdef Apr 2016 #69
That is common knowledge. The disclosure forms only report in ranges. pnwmom Apr 2016 #70
No, the fact that financial disclosures are required isn't even common knowledge... phleshdef Apr 2016 #74
Here's more info on the forms, in case you're interested. pnwmom Apr 2016 #76
They are waiting from Hillary & Brock to make it a big real, then release & show it was a non issue krawhitham Apr 2016 #52
Milk that nothing! AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #60
What's that over there! DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #77

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
31. Sure Hillary has been busy
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016

Like Hillary doesn't have a tax accountant and maybe even a tax lawyer who does their taxes and can post them for her. Pick up a phone and it's done.

How many times has Bernie even been home between all his jet setting around? Is he still trying to manage his senate job too, or are they in recess now?

Give him a break. He will get to it.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
10. I use turbo tax and it allows you to save your tax returns as pdf files
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:15 PM
Apr 2016

It's so easy.

Any monkey could do it.

dflprincess

(28,078 posts)
51. Perhaps they don't take that option
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:27 PM
Apr 2016

I don't, I just print a copy of them and stick them a file. I don't leave any personal information on my computer.


BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
42. Very astute
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 07:45 PM
Apr 2016

Anything less than smooth sailing plants doubt and lowers his ceiling a little because he is still a relative mystery on the personal front.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
5. he should have added "go to opensource.com like a real reporter would do"
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:00 PM
Apr 2016

More info there than you'll find on tax returns anyway

Autumn

(45,084 posts)
53. You should put that link in a stand alone OP for those who are deeply concerned and
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:31 PM
Apr 2016

will ignore that you posted it as long as they can.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
7. release the transcripts
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:09 PM
Apr 2016

make the democrats who are currently doubting you come to your camp..unless.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
14. She got $200K from Burlington College when they forced her out
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:23 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:54 PM - Edit history (1)

after she obtained a huge real estate loan for the college without having the promised security for it .

Maybe he doesn't want that discussed.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
21. Her income is part of his return, and he benefited from that payout too.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:51 PM
Apr 2016

If you DON'T think this would be an issue if he's in the general, then you never heard of Rose Hill law firm, did you?

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
32. about hc's returns
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511626213

Among the nuggets in the Clintons' tax forms: The couple has his-and-her LLCs, a corporate entity made by independent earners for tax advantages. Hillary Clinton's post-State Department income from speeches and her book, “Hard Choices,” was paid to ZFS Holdings LLC, established in Delaware a week after she left the job. Her husband uses a similar entity, WJC LLC, to take in speech and consulting income. The Clintons listed WJC but not ZFS in financial disclosures released earlier this year, and the Clinton campaign did not respond to questions about why the candidate's LLC was not disclosed.
The Clintons disclosed $3,022,700 in charitable contributions last year, including $3 million to the Clinton Family Foundation and $200 to Hot Springs High School's class of 1964, for which the former president attended his 50th reunion last fall. In all, the Clintons gave $14,959,450 in charitable contributions between 2007 and 2014, though nearly all-$14,769,000-went to the Clinton Family Foundation, which disburses donations to other charities, including the Clinton Foundation.
The Clintons utilize a tax strategy that I have advocated over the years. Their smart tax adviser has set up a tax savings strategy utilizing their own charity. It is real nice to contribute to your own charity, take the tax deduction and then get some of the money back as administrative fees.

////////////////////////

so i wonder why hc's ZFS LLC was not disclosed, wonder why the clinton campaign will not answer

before this campaign i would never have guessed that rich folks create charities to hide income in and to avoid paying taxes

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
43. yes, and they don't match earlier required financial disclosures
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 07:50 PM
Apr 2016

The Clintons listed WJC but not ZFS in financial disclosures released earlier this year, and the Clinton campaign did not respond to questions about why the candidate's LLC was not disclosed.

////////

since you are such a big hc fan i thought you might like to clear up the discrepancy

/////

what do you think about the clintons donating to the foundation to avoid ss taxes?

us peons wish we had the money to create a charity to avoid taxes and then use the money as we wish

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
44. I have no problem with them donating directly to the foundation.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 07:56 PM
Apr 2016

There is no reason for those funds to be taxed for social security, since they are going directly to the foundation. That would just mean less for the charity without affecting the Clinton's earnings at all, since they are giving away the money anyway.

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
45. not directly...first thru the LLC she forgot to disclose
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:01 PM
Apr 2016

then to the foundation to avoid taxes

do they then borrow money to live off of?

ya know for her 50 grand a week vacation home and stuff

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
46. She's released all the info and it's clear they have plenty of money
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:10 PM
Apr 2016

without needing to live off the charitable foundation.

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
57. i thought they were dead broke a couple years ago
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:29 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511639905

here is an op about them breaking their agreement with obama to disclose foundation donors

there seems to be nothing they can't get away with

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
20. Are you sure they sold? Diocese (seller) reduced obligation by over a million $.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:43 PM
Apr 2016

Asking . . . that's what I read. It was small private college expecting higher enrollment that didn't materialize. Nothing fraudulent. I guess she wasn't all that well-like by students however. (from wiki)

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
22. The possibly fraudulent part was claiming that she had millions in a multi-yr donation
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:53 PM
Apr 2016

that was actually promised in a future bequest . . . whenever.

I thought they sold it, but maybe it was just marked down as a loss. That wasn't the key issue, however.

To me there were two key issues. How she got the job in the first place, with her very thin resume. (A trustee reportedly said that the board was influenced by the fact that she was married to the Senator.) And the other was the way she mishandled the loan.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
25. Was that fraud or belief?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:13 PM
Apr 2016

and assuming her relationship with Sanders - I agree, that might have helped. Pretty normal procedure in business. Do you think Hillary's relationship with Bill has helped her political career? In some ways currently, it may be hurting. But we are talking about how people get jobs.

I don't think Jane's history will help Bernie but I am voting Bernie and not Jane. I cannot see her influencing him somehow. She is in social work which aligns well with Bernie's principles. Did you know that Hillary moved Bill to the right to help him in Arkansas win the governor's seat?

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
65. She reported the money as donations over a set period of time,
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 11:52 PM
Apr 2016

but it was actually a bequest for an unknown future date. She had a fiduciary obligation to have evidence that those funds were REAL when she completed the loan forms.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
80. And so they had to pay her off $200K to break her contract, and it would be reported in those
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 09:41 PM
Apr 2016

tax returns Bernie hasn't released yet.

That he apparently doesn't want out there.

Maybe he's waiting till he loses the primaries, and then it will be moot.



P.S. One of the trustees said in an interview that Bernie being a Senator was one of the things that led to them hiring her. And considering she had her PhD from an online place that lost its accreditation shortly afterwards; and she only a year and a half of relevant education experience, that seems likely.

IOW, she seems to have gotten a college President job that she was ill qualified for and performed poorly at because of her husband's position as Senator.

If he's in the general this will be coming up. It's all up there, fully covered in the Vermont papers. It just hasn't come out in the national media.

http://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/jane-says-sanders-secret-weapon-or-a-political-liability/Content?oid=2670992

Burlington activist Robin Lloyd, who served on the board, says she supported O'Meara Sanders' hiring, in part, because, "We felt that her connection with Bernie would be helpful, certainly in terms of fundraising." But when the college had to come up with the cash to make its payments, O'Meara Sanders didn't pull through, she says.

"She was very confident and gave good presentations to the board, but, frankly, she didn't raise money," Lloyd says.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
30. It was not marked down as a loss -- the property was actually sold for LESS than its value
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:22 PM
Apr 2016

by the Catholic diocese to the school. It is a big, gorgeous property that stretched along the lake front.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
29. No, the college is still there
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:19 PM
Apr 2016

They found a developer who bought PART of the property and will build homes there. That allowed them to pay off part of the mortgage. This was apparently always the plan, but took longer than anticipated. One bonus - apparently from local stories, the developer is also building a dormitory.

A later President, resigned when students protested her too.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
23. The college did not sell the property for a loss
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016

It includes the land it is sitting on. In fact, the deal was to sell PART OF THE PROPERTY to build housing AND they will be building the college some college housing - something they did not have on site before.

The original deal was complicated. To work, the college had to grow its student body and they had to find a developer to build housing on part of the land - which would pay off a large chunk of the mortgage. Neither happened as quickly as had been anticipated by the original plan.

However, at this point, the college has a nice place to grow and still own considerable land and their student body is much larger than it was when they bought the property. Your post makes it seem the college lost through this -- it didn't. It went from a small building at a busy corner (North Avenue and North St) to a grand, but dilapidated building that needed a lot of renovation on a pretty piece of lakeshore property.

The college could never stayed in its original home and grown to the size that it became.

I have actually been in both buildings. The old building now is used by COTS, a Burlington non profit for the homeless, where they do their phone banking for contributions before Christmas. I saw the college when the community was welcomed to see it.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
26. So Jane was visionary but needed time to see that vision materialize.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:15 PM
Apr 2016

That's a common error in business. Expecting pay-offs too soon. I'm pleased the college is doing well.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
73. There has been plenty of coverage in the Vermont media, but not national coverage.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:12 AM
Apr 2016

This is an example from a non-right wing site with plenty of positive Bernie coverage.

http://vtdigger.org/2015/09/13/jane-sanders-overstated-donation-amounts-in-loan-application-for-burlington-college/

Former Burlington College president Jane Sanders overstated donation amounts in a bank application for a $6.7 million loan that was used by the college to purchase a prime 33-acre property on Lake Champlain in 2010.

Sanders told People’s United Bank that the college had $2.6 million in pledged donations to support the purchase of the former Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington property on North Avenue. The college, however, received only $676,000 in actual donations from 2010 through 2014, according to figures provided by Burlington College.

That’s far less than the $5 million Sanders listed as likely pledges in the loan agreement, and less than a third of the $2.14 million Sanders had promised People’s Bank the college would collect in cash during the four-year period.

Two people whose pledges are listed as confirmed in the loan agreement told VTDigger that their personal financial records show their pledges were overstated. Neither were aware that the pledges were used to secure the loan.

Burlington College also cited a $1 million bequest as a pledged donation that would be paid out over six years, even though the money would only be available after the donor’s death.


SniP

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
78. Well that wasn't smart. I understand her belief the money would come but it was a bad decision.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 04:41 AM
Apr 2016

Build it and they will come . . . where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, in the movies.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
15. One of least wealthy in Congress? What's there to see?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:23 PM
Apr 2016

I know, you gotta have something to grouse about.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
16. For one thing, Jane reportedly got a $200K payout when she was
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:29 PM
Apr 2016

involuntarily ousted from Burlington College, due to her financial mismanagement there.

And his deductions would be interesting to see. The writer of the OP article says they're unusually high.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
28. $200,000 - is that a lot in politics? I don't think so. What do you think about bank pay offs?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:18 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary Helps a Bank—and Then It Funnels Millions to the Clintons

The Wall Street Journal’s eyebrow-raising story of how the presidential candidate and her husband accepted cash from UBS without any regard for the appearance of impropriety that it created.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
33. She was not ousted for financial mismanagement and the $200K payout is
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:29 PM
Apr 2016

what happens when you have a contract. (In fact, the Burlington Public School System bought out a Principal for over $200,000.http://www.wptz.com/news/vermont-new-york/burlington/superintendent-jeanne-collins-to-resign-in-june/25961684 )

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
17. By this time in 2012, even Mitt had released his most recently completed tax return.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:30 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie saying that they've been too busy is not a believable excuse for not releasing his returns.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
34. Mitt would also have tax people to do this for him.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:32 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary and Mitch can do it with a phone call.

Bernie and Jane probably need to go home and find files. Giver them a little time. They will get to it

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
40. He said Jane does their taxes.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 07:05 PM
Apr 2016

so sure, he could make a call to a tax consultant and say look under the front door mat, there's a key. Go upstairs to Jane's study and look for our returns. We need them posted on-line asap!


Yeah, he could do this.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
48. How is he blaming her? She's with him on the campaign trial
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:17 PM
Apr 2016

When she has time to go home and get them dug up and posted it will get done.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
71. Who says?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

Is there some rule and deadline date that they've been given, or is it just coming up now because Brock is shining the cute little red laser for all of you to chase? You see, he got tired of Hillary being asked for transcripts, so he's decided to use this as a tit-for-tat...I read an article about this on a Hill blog (some blue review or something) a little earlier today. It's a deliberate ploy to send all the kitties chasing after the red dot to annoy Sanders and his campaign and supporters, so he will stop mentioning the transcripts.

Won't work though because he sees through it and we see through it.

Now go chase your dot. I'm not playing this game any more.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
75. I haven't been paying attention to Brock. I've been doing my own taxes,
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:16 AM
Apr 2016

like most people, and that reminded me that this was still an issue.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
18. I think that I will lurk every morning
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:36 PM
Apr 2016

in the HRC group to find the attack plan of the day,
and then discard any OPs on the same subject,
because they are totally useless.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
27. I am sure he is looking into it
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:17 PM
Apr 2016

Give him a few months
Or the "nobody cares about it" defense like from your side.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
50. No but he's a yuuuge hypocrite for demanding transparency for everyone else
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:23 PM
Apr 2016

but showing Nixonian levels of secrecy and obfuscation on disclosures every presidential nominee has made.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
49. His full financial disclosures since his first term in Congress...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:20 PM
Apr 2016

...have always been available. Those disclosures are better than tax returns. We were fine with this in regard to John Kerry. Please stop this nonsense. All his relevant financial history is out there in a very thorough fashion.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
56. No, what I'm saying is in direct opposition to the argument Romney made.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:26 PM
Apr 2016

One of the legit defenses regarding the finances of Kerry, Sanders, McCain or anyone other Congress type critter who has ran is they have all been subject to the Ethics in Government Act since 1978. If you've been in the house or senate for decades, then disclosure of finances are always available. Thats a point that was brought up when Romney attempted to lie about Kerry... that even if Romney wasn't lying, the information was still always out there because Kerry had been subject to this requirement for ages. I remember using this argument to make right wing heads explode several times in 2012.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_in_Government_Act?wprov=sfla1

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
61. No, you implied Kerry only released his Senate disclosure forms, and not his tax returns,
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

and that's false.

Filing Senate disclosure forms, as Bernie has done, is a separate issue. Filing the Senate forms isn't a substitute for releasing your tax returns.

Kerry and Clinton have done both. It's time for Bernie to join them.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
62. No I did not imply that. But perhaps I wasn't being clear.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:02 PM
Apr 2016

It was pretty common to bring up the Senate financial disclosures in arguments regarding Romney's claims about John Kerry. If you weren't there for those discussions, then I apologize. I assumed you would know what I was getting at.

Bernie will release his returns. But the financial disclosures Senators and Congress members file are pretty much just as good as a tax return.


But let me ask you...

Have you even bothered to look at Bernie's financial disclosures? What question do you want answered that you can't get from those disclosures? Do you even have an actual, valid argument to make regarding what you want to see in Bernie's tax returns that you aren't seeing in his decades of public financial disclosures? I'm trying to understand if you and others are complaining about this because you THINK there is merit to it or because its just something to complain about.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
66. Not very different. The disclosures provide things tax returns don't and vice versa.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 11:53 PM
Apr 2016

But as far as income amounts, assets and sources for those things, they are in there.

The only thing you will see on a tax return is the rate paid in taxes along with credits and deductions. I'm not sure why you think thats so important. Also, Bernie said he will release them anyway, so your point in completely moot.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
70. That is common knowledge. The disclosure forms only report in ranges.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:03 AM
Apr 2016

But this isn't common knowledge -- and doesn't even include his real estate holdings in Vermont and D.C.

http://time.com/money/4235986/bernie-sanders-millionaire-finances/

But that form does not require Sanders to disclose the amount of savings or the kinds of investments he holds in his government retirement savings account, known as the Thrift Savings Plan — the well-regarded retirement plan, similar in many ways, to a private-sector 401(k), that GOP hopeful Marco Rubio actually proposes opening up to other Americans. The form also doesn’t include the large pension that Sanders will receive when he retires from Congress.

Sanders’ campaign did not reply to repeated emails from MONEY about his finances and his retirement account.

$1 Million-Plus Nest Egg

Although Sanders and his wife’s joint tax return showed income of only a little more than $200,000 for 2014 — including his $174,000 salary, his mayoral pension, and their Social Security payments — the senator’s expected retirement benefits make his situation much more comparable to those in the millionaire class he faults.

If Sanders, now 74, retires from politics at the end of his current Senate term two years from now, without having won the presidential election, he will be able to collect an annual pension of $71,340, MONEY calculated using the current Congressional pension formula.

For another 74-year-old man to buy a guaranteed income stream (or annuity) that would pay out the same inflation-adjusted benefit starting at age 76, it would cost “about $1 million,” according to a calculation that David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar Investment Management, ran for MONEY.

SNIP

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
74. No, the fact that financial disclosures are required isn't even common knowledge...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:15 AM
Apr 2016

But fine, they have ranges, I'll assume you are telling the truth, you don't come off as someone who lies to me.

The calculations for Senator/Congress critters pensions are publicly available. Anyone who had the time could look that information up and figure out how much Sanders will get.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie's defense for not ...