Current delegate totals Sanders 1031 Clinton 1258 (+227, est.) - Needed for majority 2024.

[JackRiddler]

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

1. K&R

[wendylaroux]

2. There ya go!!

thank you.

[pdsimdars]

3. Must be one of those darned Bernie supporters . . putting up the plain truth and all. . . .

without trying to mislead or deceive.

[Zira]

4. Yep, all those lobbyist really paying off for a bought out Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Can't wait until her tax haven gets exposed.

[onehandle]

5. Non-caucus, non-open primaries for next three weeks representing 25% of the U.S.

Buh-bye, 'Not Hillary' Party.

[Goblinmonger]

8. As a Sanders supporter, I have a good feeling about Wisconsin

I'm pretty sure we will come through for him.

[onehandle]

9. A smaller prize for April.

Swan song.

[Goblinmonger]

12. Glad we aren't important.

Hope that isn't the case in November after we will be dismissed today for going Sanders.

[lunamagica]

20. It's not that you are not important. It's that Sanders needs a landside win for WI to make

a difference. a ten or 20 point victory will not help him much

[JackRiddler]

22. May it be so - 49 minutes to polls close.

[daleanime]

27. Trust me, when it's made plain to me that I'm not wanted in the party....

I will leave. Until then please excuse me, we've got lots of work to do.

[justaddh2o]

6. And how about WA state's delegate count?

Google still hasn't updated the delegate count for Bernie in WA state. He won by 72.7% and still it shows him with just 25 delegates. What gives with that?

[JackRiddler]

13. I added those.

+15 Clinton, +50 Sanders added to the Google totals.

Hence in the thread title: Estimated ("est.&quot

Since these may vary + or - by 1-5 once the county/state level conventions (and the shenanigans) are done.

[casperthegm]

7. Thank you for posting the actual count

Tired of HRC supporters posting the delegates with the SD count, as if we on the DU aren't smart enough to know the truth.

[JackRiddler]

17. Avec plaisir

[yeoman6987]

10. I was wondering what the real numbers were

Thank you for proving us this information.

[JackRiddler]

14. My pleasure for you & the others, now let's keep this kicked.

Fighting disinfo is 24/7, unfortunately.

[SidDithers]

11. As a reminder...

On March 8, after the spectacular upset in Michigan, Bernie was 213 delegates behind Clinton (767-554, according to 538) or 212 delegates behind (773-561, according to RCP).


As good as Bernie has been over the last couple weeks, he's further behind Clinton than he was on March 8.


Math, baby.

Sid

[morningfog]

15. She was 335 ahead just a few contests ago. He's cut her lead by a third. As a reminder...

[Sheepshank]

19. and he still behind hundreds of delegate votes.

Hundreds!

[NWCorona]

16. Check back tomorrow

Math has a funny way of not staying static.

[Jefferson23]

18. Recommend..thanks, Jack. n/t

[JackRiddler]

21. You're welcome.

[BernieforPres2016]

23. Is that number before or after the adjustment coming in Nevada?

The last I saw was that Nevada is probably going from 20-15 Hillary to 20-15 Bernie, which would cut the margin by another 10 if you haven't included it.

[JackRiddler]

24. Not sure, I used Google as the base, so...

No, they still list Nevada as Clinton 20-15.

Anyway, given no WA final we can leave it as "estimated" for now. (I was probably slightly generous to Sanders in the addition there.)

(Was the swing really that great? Wow!)

[BernieforPres2016]

25. I was thinking the net number was under 220 after adjusting for Nevada

From what I have read, there is still one more step in Nevada but a 10 delegate swing is expected.

[BernieforPres2016]

26. This is a good model if you haven't seen it

http://demrace.com/?share=F2dyLJi2

It shows Clinton +226 but has not adjusted Nevada. It has an estimate for Washington. You can make your own estimates for the remaining primaries to come up with your own projection.