2016 Postmortem

RandySF

(59,230 posts) Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:13 PM Apr 2016

Hilary's putting up respectable numbers

A win is a win and my hat's off to Bernie, but with 32% in, Hillary isn't exactly letting him walk away with it right now. I don't know where the totals are from, but if Milwaukee's still out, it might get a little closer.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hilary's putting up respectable numbers (Original Post) RandySF Apr 2016 OP

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #3

Results on that one: Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #8

Thank you. CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #9

Nope NYT is projecting it will be a +12-13 win for the Bern GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #2

You had the site with the needed projected wins nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #4

Do you mean timmymoff Apr 2016 #5

Milwaukee is mostly in. Vattel Apr 2016 #6

Better yet let's play the "trump" card... Jeffersons Ghost Apr 2016 #7

She's collapsing. YASSIR THE FAT Apr 2016 #10

Nope, it's got much worse for Clinton - now +12 Sanders and... JackRiddler Apr 2016 #11

Response to RandySF (Original post)

Post removed

Response to Post removed (Reply #1)

CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)

8. Results on that one:

Reply to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:54 PM

Apr 2016

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:47 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Obvious hide. The only real question is whether MIRT should take a look.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I was just in this thread and was about to alert on this when the jury "summons" came in. So my vote should be obvious. I'm no Hillary fan, but fat shaming? Really? Fuck no.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Ding. Ding. Ding. May be the most disgusting thing I ever read here since 2004. You make me want to puke
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Can't we disagree without this bullshit?

Juror #3 here...

CompanyFirstSergeant

(1,558 posts)

9. Thank you.

Reply to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #8)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:59 PM

Apr 2016

The photo was inappropriate.

I'm not being sensitive for myself - it was a private family moment that should be respected, that's all.

Politics aside.

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)

2. Nope NYT is projecting it will be a +12-13 win for the Bern

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:41 PM

Apr 2016

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

4. You had the site with the needed projected wins

Reply to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:42 PM

Apr 2016

iirc that is what he was supposed to do, in fact I think he over-performed... but I cannot find the site right now, and too tired to actually do math.

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)

5. Do you mean

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:43 PM

Apr 2016

numbers of dollars allowed to be hidden by her support of the Panamanian trade deal? Or numbers like the amount of days she supported a $15 minimum wage? Or number of dead due to her Iraq war vote? She is as inspiring a moldy 2x4.

Vattel

(9,289 posts)

6. Milwaukee is mostly in.

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:44 PM

Apr 2016

Jeffersons Ghost

(15,235 posts)

7. Better yet let's play the "trump" card...

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:51 PM

Apr 2016

Did any reader realize Trump has offended Muslims, Jews, Blacks, Hispanics and other people, repeatedly? How can they fix this election? Maybe with the right US Supreme Court appointee, the ultra-wealthy can finally reduce everyone to oppression of the working-class or abject slavery! Who is the only person allowed to appoint US Supreme Justices?

YASSIR THE FAT

(49 posts)

10. She's collapsing.

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:01 PM

Apr 2016

Collapsing big. The lies and the attacks from the Clinton campaign has only proven Bernie correct.

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)

11. Nope, it's got much worse for Clinton - now +12 Sanders and...

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:05 PM

Apr 2016

Milwaukee is nearly all in (439/479, only 51-49 for Clinton). Overall 58% reporting and most precincts that have not come in are in rural areas and HALF of Madison still to report, where he's getting 62% and the voting numbers are not much lower than in Milwaukee.

56% and looking like he should hit the magic 57%! (Not that whatever the final count this isn't a win, important, momentum, and a big step toward the nomination! No matter what spin the toothless and obsolescent punditry wants to put on it.)

Reply to this discussion