Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNYT Editorial Board: Why Mrs. Clinton Needs to Say More About the Crime Bill
Mrs. Clinton advocated for some of the most significant initiatives of her husbands presidency, which were most often the product of compromise in a divided Congress. Indeed, many Democrats revere Mr. Clinton as the leader who brought the party back from the political wilderness by eschewing ideological purity in favor of a more incremental, politically centrist philosophy.
That legacy and experience lies at the heart of Mrs. Clintons approach as a progressive who gets things done. And the 1994 crime bill, which has emerged as a hot-button issue in the current campaign, is a good example in both its substance and the style of the Clinton manner of policy making.
...
Mr. Sanderss durability in this race is due in part to young, idealistic Democrats who werent born before or dont remember the partisan battles of the 1990s. Indeed, 2016s newest voters only know the Obama-era Congress, and its near-constant state of confrontation. On the crime bill, as on the Iraq war, trade deals and gay marriage, some young critics view Mrs. Clintons changes in position as politically convenient or unprincipled. The way to reach those voters is to acknowledge their objections and better explain what it takes to move an agenda through a hostile Congress.
...
Mrs. Clintons record as a senator is one of pragmatism, reflecting temperamental and philosophical differences with Mr. Sanders, whose reluctance to compromise contributes to his limited legislative record. She should take this opportunity to spell out what she would do with Congress to address mass incarceration as president.
That legacy and experience lies at the heart of Mrs. Clintons approach as a progressive who gets things done. And the 1994 crime bill, which has emerged as a hot-button issue in the current campaign, is a good example in both its substance and the style of the Clinton manner of policy making.
...
Mr. Sanderss durability in this race is due in part to young, idealistic Democrats who werent born before or dont remember the partisan battles of the 1990s. Indeed, 2016s newest voters only know the Obama-era Congress, and its near-constant state of confrontation. On the crime bill, as on the Iraq war, trade deals and gay marriage, some young critics view Mrs. Clintons changes in position as politically convenient or unprincipled. The way to reach those voters is to acknowledge their objections and better explain what it takes to move an agenda through a hostile Congress.
...
Mrs. Clintons record as a senator is one of pragmatism, reflecting temperamental and philosophical differences with Mr. Sanders, whose reluctance to compromise contributes to his limited legislative record. She should take this opportunity to spell out what she would do with Congress to address mass incarceration as president.
Much more @: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/13/opinion/why-mrs-clinton-needs-to-say-more-about-the-crime-bill.html
=========
Hillary Clinton's pragmatism is something this country could do without. Bill & Hillary's "pragmatism" got us financial deregulation, the crime bill, the PATRIOT act, the Iraq War, etc. But, hey, it sure got them a lot of friendly corporate partners.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1582 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Editorial Board: Why Mrs. Clinton Needs to Say More About the Crime Bill (Original Post)
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
OP
Bill & Hillary's "pragmatism" got us financial deregulation, the crime bill, the PATRIOT act,
elleng
Apr 2016
#5
Yes, the editorial (which you may not have read) mentions that. They also mention
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
#8
He opposed the parts that Hillary promoted, the ones that unfairly targeted minorities:
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#9
jfern
(5,204 posts)1. Endorse first and then ask for her to not totally suck later?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)2. They have not published a single such editorial admonishing Bernie
Almost makes you wonder why the hell they'd support such a compromised candidate in the first place?
elleng
(130,865 posts)6. Really!
They should know better! Think they're as 'divided' internally as the Dem party is???
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)3. Ouch. She keeps trying to run away from her record but can't.
Her vote for the Iraq war and opposition to marriage equality are just two examples of her lack of judgement and/or willingness to side with the majority instead of doing the right thing.
dchill
(38,474 posts)4. Personally, I thought Governor Moonbeam...
would have made a great President.
elleng
(130,865 posts)5. Bill & Hillary's "pragmatism" got us financial deregulation, the crime bill, the PATRIOT act,
the Iraq War, etc.
ecstatic
(32,687 posts)7. Bernie voted for that crime bill, BTW. nt
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)8. Yes, the editorial (which you may not have read) mentions that. They also mention
that he voted for the bill because it had good things in it (VAWA, gun regulation). He opposed the mass incarceration provisions.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)9. He opposed the parts that Hillary promoted, the ones that unfairly targeted minorities:
But voted for it to save women's lives:
AzDar
(14,023 posts)10. She's a HORRIBLE Candidate... Dishonest, Corrupt, and SO NOT a Progressive.