Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result

[Tarc]

Sanders has a finely-honed shtick; lots of agitation, hand-waving, and angry pontificating. Lots of problem identification but little in the way of problem-solving.

This shtick appeals to those who have already gathered behind him, but if Sanders is to have a chance at the nomination, he needs to win delegate-rich states by sizable margins. To have a chance at that, he needs to broaden his appeal beyond that mostly white, mostly millennial base.

That didn't happen tonight, and if it didn't happen tonight, then the needle didn't move at all on his chances to New York and the nomination.

[Logical]

1. Lol, you just like reading your own posts? Nt

[berniepdx420]

2. Dang .. I thought your OP was referring to electing another Bush/Clinton

corporate

[Schema Thing]

3. Oh you mean like using the Kissinger game plan for other countries?

Wow, some common sense is finally getting through to Hillary supporters. That's growth! Well done!

[polichick]

4. Voting for another corporate tool expecting a different outcome is insane.

[Joe the Revelator]

5. Whatever he's doing won him 8/9 of the last contests. Who needs a different result?

[Tarc]

7. Low-delegate, mostly white open caucus/primary states

We're kinda done with those now.

[Corporate666]

8. So based on that...

you're predicting a big win for Sanders in NY, and big wins the following week in PA, CT, RI, DE, MD?

And it that does not come to pass, will you agree that Sanders made a mistake in not appealing to groups beyond young white people and should retire from the race?

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

6. We have elected enough Neocons...

I have seen the damage they wrought and I am not insane so I refuse to nominate another neocon to join the other eventual neocon from the right.

[Ron Green]

9. "Broaden his appeal?"

How about just keep telling the truth? That, not broadening appeal, is what this country really needs. Whether or not Americans respond is on us.