Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 04:54 AM Apr 2016

I don't like the term "c*******e w***e", it demeans actual w***es

W***es are powerless people who are usually forced one way or another to do something most of us would find horribly degrading simply in order to survive.

Those politicians who sell out their constituents to corporations for a few favors or dollars on the other hand are powerful people acting traitorously for their own aggrandizement, something not even in the same moral universe as what the average w***e does and not in a good way.

Stop demeaning w***res by comparing them to corrupt politicians.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't like the term "c*******e w***e", it demeans actual w***es (Original Post) Fumesucker Apr 2016 OP
what bullshit. boston bean Apr 2016 #1
No Beano JackInGreen Apr 2016 #3
What part do you disagree with? Fumesucker Apr 2016 #4
It's absolutely true. senz Apr 2016 #22
I've known a few paid....artists, worked with a couple JackInGreen Apr 2016 #2
But for lobbyists-the corporate johns-that is the desired service. n/t JimDandy Apr 2016 #7
But the "service" was already paid for by the constituents Fumesucker Apr 2016 #9
The term whore simply means someone who sells themself for money JimDandy Apr 2016 #5
Unless you were born wealthy then you need to look in the mirror Fumesucker Apr 2016 #6
I just need my dictionary, not a mirror. n/t JimDandy Apr 2016 #8
Even if you work for yourself you're always selling yourself Fumesucker Apr 2016 #10
But I am not compromising my ethics TM99 Apr 2016 #11
This was the definition I was responding to.. Fumesucker Apr 2016 #12
A lot of people can't understand the concept of 'metaphor'. delrem Apr 2016 #15
And if you got an education TM99 Apr 2016 #23
You lead with a direct personal attack and want an adult discussion? Fumesucker Apr 2016 #24
So it is now a direct personal attack TM99 Apr 2016 #25
Well corporate horse does work. I.e. I'm betting on the corporate horse in this race Zira Apr 2016 #13
Looks like you were alerted on and B Calm Apr 2016 #14
I think someone may be feeling the Bern... Fumesucker Apr 2016 #16
No problem. B Calm Apr 2016 #17
thank you reddread Apr 2016 #18
How about pimps? Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #19
The problem is simply this: Buns_of_Fire Apr 2016 #20
It's easy to feel sympathy and concern for sex workers senz Apr 2016 #21
I agree..... daleanime Apr 2016 #26
What a very, very good point. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #27
I propose "corporate horror" AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #28

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
2. I've known a few paid....artists, worked with a couple
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:01 AM
Apr 2016

Unlike CWs you can appreciate PALPABLY successful services rendered, with the C****** Wh*** YOU'RE the one getting fucked.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. But the "service" was already paid for by the constituents
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:19 AM
Apr 2016

So you go to the club, pay big bucks for the long teasing lap dance and lots of bottles of "champagne" but then they disappear in the back room with someone else for five bucks and tell you to get lost?

You know who got screwed on that deal.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
5. The term whore simply means someone who sells themself for money
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:03 AM
Apr 2016

or some other benefit. Motivation or status (rich, poor, powerful, powerless) are not part of its definition.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
6. Unless you were born wealthy then you need to look in the mirror
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:06 AM
Apr 2016

I don't necessarily disagree with that either.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
10. Even if you work for yourself you're always selling yourself
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:22 AM
Apr 2016

Maybe even especially if you work for yourself.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
11. But I am not compromising my ethics
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:38 AM
Apr 2016

nor my integrity.

And that is what distinguishes them from sex workers.

There is a very good reason why Media Whores Online was popular in the early 2000's. Oh, lest we forget that just because a Democrat is in office and we are in a Democratic Primary that yes indeed there are still male and female corporate whores on both sides of the aisle who will compromise their ethics (if they even have any!) and their integrity (if they have any!) all for power, money, and influence.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
12. This was the definition I was responding to..
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:49 AM
Apr 2016
The term whore simply means someone who sells themself for money or some other benefit.


Mentioned nothing about ethics or integrity.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
15. A lot of people can't understand the concept of 'metaphor'.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:49 AM
Apr 2016

So they have trouble.

Professional attack dogs like David Brock are paid to play off of that lack of understanding and to play into their target's emotional responses. It's what guys like Brock studied and learned how to do, to become one of the highest paid operatives.

A lot more people do understand the concept of 'metaphor' but enjoy pretending that they don't, so go along with professional spinners like Brock both knowingly and willingly. For them it's just a kick.

Hard to tell the difference, sometimes.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
23. And if you got an education
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

then you would recognize the differences between denotations and connotations.

When the term is used as it is being done so here for more than a decade the inclusion of ethics and integrity is what distinguishes it from a simple sale for money or other benefits.

Come on, let's have a real adult discussion instead of an emotionally fueled secondary school rant.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
25. So it is now a direct personal attack
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:06 PM
Apr 2016

to point out that if one got an education, they would understand the difference between denotations and connotations?

Well then, obviously you simply have an agenda instead of a real point.

 

Zira

(1,054 posts)
13. Well corporate horse does work. I.e. I'm betting on the corporate horse in this race
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 05:53 AM
Apr 2016

to get beat by a bird.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
19. How about pimps?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:34 AM
Apr 2016

They take corporate money to let them screw you over on a daily basis and making people vote to get screwed...

Buns_of_Fire

(17,175 posts)
20. The problem is simply this:
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:56 AM
Apr 2016

There *** ****** ****** ****** **** *** *** the ****** ** ******* ******* ************. ****, and *** **** **** **** ******* a ********** *** ***** ** ********** ** **** *** sexism **** **** **** ********** but *** ********, if ******* *********** *** ******** ** *** *** *** *****-***** ******* *** **** ******* **** ******** *** *** country.

I apologize for being so blunt, but there it is.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
21. It's easy to feel sympathy and concern for sex workers
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:14 AM
Apr 2016

and impossible to feel it for corporate whores. Because the latter sell our government out from under us. They betray us.

We should keep them out of the presidency.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
28. I propose "corporate horror"
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:12 PM
Apr 2016

pretty much means the same thing and if you slip accidentally it's easy to correct in stride

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't like the term "c*...