![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Human101948 | Apr 2016 | OP |
onehandle | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
Human101948 | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
onehandle | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
Hiraeth | Apr 2016 | #32 | |
revbones | Apr 2016 | #11 | |
Jefferson23 | Apr 2016 | #15 | |
frylock | Apr 2016 | #22 | |
BuelahWitch | Apr 2016 | #28 | |
frylock | Apr 2016 | #29 | |
pantsonfire | Apr 2016 | #23 | |
Hiraeth | Apr 2016 | #33 | |
FreakinDJ | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
DebDoo | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
Human101948 | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
Dem2 | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
Human101948 | Apr 2016 | #12 | |
Dem2 | Apr 2016 | #21 | |
loyalsister | Apr 2016 | #37 | |
Tarc | Apr 2016 | #8 | |
Human101948 | Apr 2016 | #13 | |
Tarc | Apr 2016 | #14 | |
Post removed | Apr 2016 | #16 | |
Tarc | Apr 2016 | #17 | |
geek tragedy | Apr 2016 | #34 | |
WDIM | Apr 2016 | #9 | |
Waiting For Everyman | Apr 2016 | #10 | |
EndElectoral | Apr 2016 | #18 | |
geek tragedy | Apr 2016 | #35 | |
catnhatnh | Apr 2016 | #38 | |
geek tragedy | Apr 2016 | #39 | |
Betty Karlson | Apr 2016 | #19 | |
amborin | Apr 2016 | #20 | |
anotherproletariat | Apr 2016 | #24 | |
pdsimdars | Apr 2016 | #25 | |
arcane1 | Apr 2016 | #26 | |
VulgarPoet | Apr 2016 | #31 | |
Jefferson23 | Apr 2016 | #27 | |
apnu | Apr 2016 | #30 | |
KoKo | Apr 2016 | #36 |
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:28 AM
onehandle (51,122 posts)
1. And then he hired her. Cool campaign talk from 8 years ago, bro. nt
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:31 AM
Human101948 (3,457 posts)
2. Do you think President Obama was lying?
I don't.
|
Response to Human101948 (Reply #2)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:37 AM
onehandle (51,122 posts)
7. His full endorsement of her is coming soon.
The end is nigh.
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #7)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:46 PM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
32. he will not say anything until the process has run its course and then he will back the nominee
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:24 AM
revbones (3,660 posts)
11. Doesn't negate his calling her a liar.
He also appointed Republicans but campaigned against Republicans. Does that negate them as liars too?
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jefferson23 (30,099 posts)
15. Yea, politics is a werid game..then she left and Obama's foreign policy changes
were evident and differed from her "advice."
Enjoy that, bro. |
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:51 PM
frylock (34,825 posts)
22. Everyone knows that was an arranged marriage.
Response to frylock (Reply #22)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:15 PM
BuelahWitch (9,083 posts)
28. More like a shotgun wedding.
Response to BuelahWitch (Reply #28)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:39 PM
frylock (34,825 posts)
29. Hmmmnn, yes. That is an apt description.
Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:52 PM
pantsonfire (1,306 posts)
23. If she wins, she might hire him....n/t
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:31 AM
FreakinDJ (17,644 posts)
3. Nothing Changes = Nothing Changes
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:34 AM
DebDoo (319 posts)
4. To be fair, she has changed the world population by several hundred thousand
Response to DebDoo (Reply #4)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:36 AM
Human101948 (3,457 posts)
5. Ouch!
That hurts!
|
Response to DebDoo (Reply #4)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:37 AM
Dem2 (8,164 posts)
6. Blaming Bush for Bush's war is so passe these days
![]() |
Response to Dem2 (Reply #6)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:27 AM
Human101948 (3,457 posts)
12. Waraholics are aided and abetted by enablers...
Hillary was one of those.
|
Response to Human101948 (Reply #12)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:32 AM
Dem2 (8,164 posts)
21. Therefore
she's a mass murderer. I've been reminded of this a few thousand times this cycle.
It never get's old though. ![]() |
Response to DebDoo (Reply #4)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 02:08 PM
loyalsister (13,390 posts)
37. Those were unintended consequences
kind of like the explosion of the prison population.
If someone knows it will happen, it is an intended consequence. So yeah she personally responsible for intentionally killing people. |
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:42 AM
Tarc (10,438 posts)
8. The mutual Obama-Hillary bitterness was set aside once he hit the g.e., kids
That's what people with a vested interest in the party, y'know, do.
|
Response to Tarc (Reply #8)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:37 AM
Human101948 (3,457 posts)
13. This observer thinks not...
The sheer improbability of the thing is striking, too, of course. All the happy-pappy posturing of the general election—the emphatic endorsements, the labored “unity” in Denver, the energetic stumping by Hillary for Barack, the two-way tongue bath between 42 and the soon-to-be 44 at a rally in Florida in the campaign’s final week—did little to alleviate the bedrock enmity between the two sides. The Clintons continued to regard Obama as a featherweight, a phony, a usurper. Obama neither liked nor trusted nor thought he needed Hill or Bill; he bridled at their apparent insistence that he kiss their rings.
http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/52428/ |
Response to Human101948 (Reply #13)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:53 AM
Tarc (10,438 posts)
14. This is about how I'd expect a Bitterman to act...
![]() |
Response to Tarc (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #16)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:48 PM
geek tragedy (68,868 posts)
34. you are living proof that we need closed primaries. keep the enemy outside the gates nt
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:48 AM
WDIM (1,662 posts)
9. Sorta like Obama.
Must be a symptom if the Job. Say what it takes to get elected walk it back when you take office.
|
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:48 AM
Waiting For Everyman (9,385 posts)
10. Nailed it!
That's her m.o. alright, say anything and change nothing.
|
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:58 AM
EndElectoral (4,213 posts)
18. Sanders should actually air this ad in New York
Response to EndElectoral (Reply #18)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:48 PM
geek tragedy (68,868 posts)
35. and get a public smack-down from the President? nt
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #35)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:47 PM
catnhatnh (8,976 posts)
38. How COULD Obama "smack him down"?
"Bernie Sanders-I was lying and you know it! Now stop attacking the Queen!"
|
Response to catnhatnh (Reply #38)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:51 PM
geek tragedy (68,868 posts)
39. He just called out a superpac for using him in an ad
attacking a Senate candidate.
He'd do the same to Sanders. |
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:17 AM
Betty Karlson (7,231 posts)
19. in other words: she IS the status quo. Can we afford more of the same?
(hint: we can't!)
|
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:25 AM
amborin (16,631 posts)
20. she would start more reckless regime change, reward Wall Street, etc...
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:57 PM
anotherproletariat (1,446 posts)
24. Does anyone here realize how campaigns work?
Hillary's knocks on Sanders will be quickly rescinded once the primary is over...because she is a seasoned politician and knows how these cycles play out. My guess is that Sanders will not be as gracious, since - as the debate showed last night - the heat of the process is really getting under his skin.
|
Response to anotherproletariat (Reply #24)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:01 PM
pdsimdars (6,007 posts)
25. You got that debate commentary backwards.
Response to anotherproletariat (Reply #24)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:12 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
26. Your post is completely full of shit, and you know it.
Stop pretending and be real.
|
Response to anotherproletariat (Reply #24)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:45 PM
VulgarPoet (2,872 posts)
31. Say again, anotherbougie?
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jefferson23 (30,099 posts)
27. It was so spot on. K&R
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:44 PM
apnu (8,672 posts)
30. This is the stupid stuff from campaigning.
Every candidate says nasty stuff about the other candidate. Doesn't matter if its in the Democratic or Republican parties. There is always a vast difference between the campaigner and the elected official. Every single one. Obama the Campaigner is wholly a different person from Obama the President. This is also true of both Bushes, Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. Basically, for most of America's history, this is true of every candidate for every office.
This is negative FUD. (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) and its part and parcel of all political campaigns. I respect Bernie for, largely, staying away from negative campaigning. Pity his supporters don't. |
Response to Human101948 (Original post)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:55 PM
KoKo (84,711 posts)
36. So...are we going to have calls for Obama to retract his statement.....?
all these years later? This would be a great retro ad for Bernie to use. Sadly, nothing has changed with Hillary that makes the ad out of date.
|