Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:53 PM Apr 2016

doesnt it seem a little odd that a candidate pays people to post?

basically chicken shit marketing, but in the broken process of
American democracy, shouldnt this be unacceptable?
or at least a red flag?
Im just a little confused about that.

113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
doesnt it seem a little odd that a candidate pays people to post? (Original Post) reddread Apr 2016 OP
Careful, they'll kick you off of DU Awknid Apr 2016 #1
Please explain. I'm new here. Unicorn Apr 2016 #91
It's some sad shit alright. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #2
666 posts! Califonz Apr 2016 #6
There are no "accidents"! CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #9
Astroturf Octafish Apr 2016 #87
You don't think some Bernie folks are paid to JoePhilly Apr 2016 #3
thats called running a campaign reddread Apr 2016 #5
And you know this how? grossproffit Apr 2016 #11
locally? because I know most of them reddread Apr 2016 #19
Nope. People assure me the meanie bernie bros do it out of pure sexism. hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #24
Welcome to "full ignore." n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #71
I wonder how many DUers really care if someone puts them on "full ignore." MineralMan Apr 2016 #75
Is there "partial ignore?" missingthebigdog Apr 2016 #78
Well, kinda. Amaril Apr 2016 #92
I don't get why it's even a thing to announce it. hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #106
Announcing that you're putting someone on ignore MineralMan Apr 2016 #107
Agreed. I'm keeping my ignore list empty, even if a few around here are infuriating. hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #108
I am a Bernie supporter and I AM mean. PatrickforO Apr 2016 #103
We're talking about people posing as regular people-- CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #28
And that's the thing right there. notadmblnd Apr 2016 #55
Yes, because with paid shilling CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #56
No, you aren't the only one Amaril Apr 2016 #94
Why pay when you have the real deal numbering in the millions? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #82
Hillary's new logo: lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #93
This is nothing new. Milestone Apr 2016 #4
is it acceptable within the voting process? reddread Apr 2016 #10
It's what keeps some of these boats afloat. nt Snotcicles Apr 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Apr 2016 #8
Big red flag. In fact, YUUUUUUUGE! nt nc4bo Apr 2016 #12
You mean I'm doing this for free when someone could be *paying* me? Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #13
Twitter pays the big bucks. I'm clocking mad Tubman's! grossproffit Apr 2016 #16
That's what they offered? Nothing? Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #21
No doubt! I want my nickel a post! PatrickforO Apr 2016 #105
must read bloomberg article - "I was a political hacker" FourScore Apr 2016 #14
GIven some of the crap they peddle, I'd expect to be paid, too. n/t winter is coming Apr 2016 #15
Not at all. LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #17
Nothing Hillary does surprises me any more Doctor_J Apr 2016 #18
There Is NEVER A SURPRISE With Hillary... Same SOP for 30 years! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #60
Surprise requires imagination Fairgo Apr 2016 #97
Sorry, people, you misunderestimate her: sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #20
I heard it's a penny a word Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #33
No. Authenticity doesn't matter; whatever it takes to win. Meaningful public discourse is quaint and lostnfound Apr 2016 #22
It is chickenshit. PowerToThePeople Apr 2016 #23
It's the invisible hand of the Free Market typing. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #25
they should use both hands reddread Apr 2016 #26
It's like what Jeb Bush had to beg for: grasswire Apr 2016 #27
that was the response she got at the NY debate. reddread Apr 2016 #29
Hasn't the Sanders camp paid $16 million LisaM Apr 2016 #30
did they? reddread Apr 2016 #34
Link? riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #43
This doesn't say how much Bernie paid them, but BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #49
Link to Bernie paying staff to troll like Brock's minions riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #63
Part of astroturfing. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #31
Bernie campaign has been doing it from the jump fun n serious Apr 2016 #32
they really didnt have a choice reddread Apr 2016 #36
Not really. It is a Corporate thing to do. Downwinder Apr 2016 #35
Nobody here is being paid to post; with all due respect, DU isn't important to the national election brooklynite Apr 2016 #37
I didnt say anything about DU reddread Apr 2016 #41
Reddit is and other mega forums nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #45
So they're paying people HDSam Apr 2016 #38
Well, she's hopelessly corrupt... Barack_America Apr 2016 #39
I don't buy that, at least not here. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #40
I didnt say DU reddread Apr 2016 #42
Well if it's somewhere else, then who knows? nolawarlock Apr 2016 #44
You may not buy that, but Hillary does. nt mhatrw Apr 2016 #74
Well then why are Bernie folks in such a majority here. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #83
She just needs enough to jam discussion up a little. mhatrw Apr 2016 #110
bernie pays people to post his ads all over the place. and he is still losing nt msongs Apr 2016 #46
All campaigns do it, including Obama's and BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #47
Where does it say that they pay people to pose is regular folks? trudyco Apr 2016 #50
See. Skills in addition to email. JonathanRackham Apr 2016 #48
Kind of like a laugh track mindwalker_i Apr 2016 #51
Desperation bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #52
Didn't she pay a bunch of people from India to rec her jwirr Apr 2016 #53
From some of the post I have wondered if there were paid posters, especially with many Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #54
When a good chunk of your base needs their grandchildren to reset the router Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #57
Read this: Baobab Apr 2016 #58
thank you reddread Apr 2016 #61
I know that my wife and I are looking forward to our robot overlords. DookDook Apr 2016 #95
Have you ever seen Kubrick (and Spielberg's) film "AI" ? Baobab Apr 2016 #96
We saw it in the theater, when we used to go out to the movies. DookDook Apr 2016 #104
No, campaigns would be stupid to allow zealots to go unchecked oasis Apr 2016 #59
disappearing Sanders from photos fast and loose? reddread Apr 2016 #64
Used to be illegal but no longer is if you skirt the edges. glinda Apr 2016 #62
Who else would? lmbradford Apr 2016 #65
I Made $$$Millions$$$ Bring an A$$hole on the Internet! You Can Too! Buns_of_Fire Apr 2016 #66
Now THAT is funny!!! Octafish Apr 2016 #99
No. Bernie's campaign has paid social media. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #67
Unfortunately Aerows Apr 2016 #68
same here reddread Apr 2016 #69
It's like the old joke Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #70
Can think of a couple countries that do it. One_Life_To_Give Apr 2016 #72
Signs of a fearfully weak candidate. Red flags should be waving! nc4bo Apr 2016 #73
This entire thread is apcalc Apr 2016 #76
and post #76 took it to new heights. Thanks for the contribution. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #80
Not really. Most national campaigns have paid staff doing that. MineralMan Apr 2016 #77
very odd silvershadow Apr 2016 #79
The reddit youths aren't buying it. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Apr 2016 #84
Or astroturf. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #88
That explains why all the posts that Hillary has won the nomination, B Calm Apr 2016 #85
Same kind of candidate that says they have been "endorsed" by some organization pdsimdars Apr 2016 #86
No more than a SoS who paid for FaceBook and Twitter 'likes" azurnoir Apr 2016 #89
Corrupt. But then I expected it from someone funded by the 1%. Unicorn Apr 2016 #90
Did any of you guys get your Bernie Bucks yet? Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #98
It takes a lot of distracting when your record sucks. SwampG8r Apr 2016 #100
What's the point of being obscenely wealthy, if you can buy people's support? nt Romulox Apr 2016 #101
Gosh darn it. I really missed the train on this one. PatrickforO Apr 2016 #102
Not odd at all. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #109
such kindness reddread Apr 2016 #113
Sanders paid people in SC to knock on doors. What is the difference? seabeyond Apr 2016 #111
Im thinking they didnt introduce themselves as Hillary supporters BUT reddread Apr 2016 #112
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
5. thats called running a campaign
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

nobody is pretending they arent a Bernie supporter or member of the campaign.

what a sad job some people have to do.

grossproffit

(5,591 posts)
11. And you know this how?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:58 PM
Apr 2016

"nobody is pretending they arent a Bernie supporter or member of the campaign."

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
19. locally? because I know most of them
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:02 PM
Apr 2016

online? none of the tells take place.
its pretty easy, theyre shooting for idiots.
at this stage, those tricks are too stale,
but THAT IS ALL BROCK CAN MUSTER.

If I were on a campaign, I would LOVE
that fool Brock for an opponent.
nothing but slime.
not even an issue.

either supreme confidence with their sights on the right
or just damn stupid and empty handed.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
75. I wonder how many DUers really care if someone puts them on "full ignore."
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:52 AM
Apr 2016

I doubt it very much. What do you think?

Amaril

(1,267 posts)
92. Well, kinda.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:36 PM
Apr 2016

You can choose to either just block mail from someone or put them on full ignore (which blocks mail and posts). I guess you could call blocking mail to be a "partial" ignore.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
107. Announcing that you're putting someone on ignore
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 07:48 PM
Apr 2016

Makes some people feel more important, I guess. I would never ignore anyone that way. It's easy to simply not click on a post or scroll past it.

The ignore feature on DU is designed to help people only see what they agree with. It's a way of avoiding having to face the reality that some people disagree with you.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
103. I am a Bernie supporter and I AM mean.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:28 PM
Apr 2016

My whole mission in life is to turn into a unicorn and prance through a series of completely unrealistic meadows...

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
28. We're talking about people posing as regular people--
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016

on Reddit, messageboards, comment sections and Twitter--being bullies and acting like disruptors to anyone who doesn't write positive comments about Hillary.

This is the definition of a paid shill! No one finds this acceptable.

It's like paying people to attend rallies. It's pathetic.

If you don't have enough organic support online--to spread your positive messages or to combat negativity--then you're a flawed candidate.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
55. And that's the thing right there.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:33 PM
Apr 2016

They don't spread any message about HRC let alone positive messages about her. They only attack Senator Sanders and his supporters.

If you ask them honest questions as to her positions on issues, all you get is crickets.

Or am I the only one who has seen this time after time?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
56. Yes, because with paid shilling
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:40 PM
Apr 2016

it isn't about propping up the candidate. It's really about demoralizing, disrupting and bullying the supporters of the other candidate. They want them to be frustrated and go away.

That's really what this is about. It always has been.

People who are paid to post like that, don't always have a strong grasp of the issues. They're not paid to dispense knowledge. They're paid to disrupt and silence so the other side gets frustrated, gives up and goes away.

Amaril

(1,267 posts)
94. No, you aren't the only one
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:40 PM
Apr 2016

I've put about 30 of them on ignore recently. Like the saying goes, obvious trolls are obvious.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
82. Why pay when you have the real deal numbering in the millions?
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

The answer to your question is a resounding NO.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
93. Hillary's new logo:
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:36 PM
Apr 2016

" "

Apparently that is all her supporters need to say. It must be some kind of secret code.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
10. is it acceptable within the voting process?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:58 PM
Apr 2016

were there never laws in place that protected us from media burn?
we didnt get her by accident.
that telecom deregulation worked miracles.

Response to reddread (Original post)

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
13. You mean I'm doing this for free when someone could be *paying* me?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:59 PM
Apr 2016

Well thanks for ruining my night.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
105. No doubt! I want my nickel a post!
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:30 PM
Apr 2016

Funny, I keep hearing this, and truly some people seem pretty one-track, but I've never figured out how to sign up to get paid anything...

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
20. Sorry, people, you misunderestimate her:
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:02 PM
Apr 2016

This is HRC's new effort to create jobs.

Of course, we don't know whether they
are well paying ones or not.


(sarc)

lostnfound

(16,180 posts)
22. No. Authenticity doesn't matter; whatever it takes to win. Meaningful public discourse is quaint and
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:03 PM
Apr 2016

Naiive. The public is best kept deluded and manipulated.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
34. did they?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:21 PM
Apr 2016

see what happens when you hire Americans instead of an offshore call center?

no wonder we need those H1B visas bumped up.
American citizens are simply too greedy.

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
49. This doesn't say how much Bernie paid them, but
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:07 PM
Apr 2016

talks about what they do for him.

"But there’s more to it than that. Sanders has relied on Revolution Messaging and his own digital staff to help build a giant email list of supporters through online ads, videos, shareable graphics and social media posts at key moments in the campaign."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/03/18/revolution-messaging-helps-drive-sanders-political-revolution/81977160/

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
32. Bernie campaign has been doing it from the jump
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:20 PM
Apr 2016

Busing people to caucuses to vote from other states too. Yes I do have proof

:large

Here is his FB. He admits it and talks about it

https://www.facebook.com/LakerGreg

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
36. they really didnt have a choice
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:23 PM
Apr 2016

those people were going to fight for Bernie one way or another.
California is a Bernie bulwark.

HDSam

(251 posts)
38. So they're paying people
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:24 PM
Apr 2016

to push pro-Clinton posts and counter anti-Clinton statements. I'd like to say it's surprising, but I've known other people who relied on tossing money around to make friends

What I'd really like to know is if the Clinton campaign is paying any number of website owners to push a pro-Clinton agenda.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
40. I don't buy that, at least not here.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:26 PM
Apr 2016

I put up a poll earlier here in GDP. 82% said they were with Bernie. This site is WAY in favor of Bernie. If Hillary were paying even a handful of people to post, you'd have dozens of sock accounts and Bernie's people would be vastly outnumbered.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
44. Well if it's somewhere else, then who knows?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:42 PM
Apr 2016

I just don't think it's happening here.

I also am skeptical of Facebook since I've seen a lot of viciousness that never gets answered.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
83. Well then why are Bernie folks in such a majority here.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:58 PM
Apr 2016

Surely she can afford to buy the means necessary to have dozens of sock accounts.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
110. She just needs enough to jam discussion up a little.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:40 PM
Apr 2016

Why waste a lot of money on this internet backwater?

trudyco

(1,258 posts)
50. Where does it say that they pay people to pose is regular folks?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:20 PM
Apr 2016

This just looks like digital advertising, getting the word out on social media, organizing people, and figuring out how to raise money. Doesn't say anything about posing as a regular citizen and then manipulating peoples' opinions. Quite a different kettle of fish.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
54. From some of the post I have wondered if there were paid posters, especially with many
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:26 PM
Apr 2016

Post in a short time period. Do they get the post fed to them in a file and then dumped here on DU?

DookDook

(166 posts)
95. I know that my wife and I are looking forward to our robot overlords.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:47 PM
Apr 2016

I think it's the only way we'll ever have a free and fair society is to let machines make all the decisions for us. I used to listen to a podcast about trans-humanism and one of the speakers used to talk about how we keep dumping information into the world wide web and we have to wonder what happens if it ever 'wakes-up.'

DookDook

(166 posts)
104. We saw it in the theater, when we used to go out to the movies.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:29 PM
Apr 2016

We were some of the few people in the theater that seemed to enjoy it. Some people weren't too happy with the 'disney' like ending, but I had no problem with it.

Have you seen the movie, Robot and Frank? It was some great hard robot sci-fi. I really loved how they portrayed the near future. It was one of the few robot movies I've seen that didn't invoke Asimov's laws of robotics.

And just so I know that I'll be reimbursed for this, #feelthebern. Almost forgot to add that and then I wouldn't get any of my Bernie Bucks.

(I'm posting this from my Obama-phone)

Half this post is sarcastic.

oasis

(49,389 posts)
59. No, campaigns would be stupid to allow zealots to go unchecked
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:45 PM
Apr 2016

playing fast and loose with the facts.

wouldn't be prudent.

lmbradford

(517 posts)
65. Who else would?
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:06 AM
Apr 2016

I don't think her supporters have been able to articulate any issues that they stand with her on. They say "woman President" or I like the Clintons as if Bill would still govern. I am a woman who proudly stands with Bernie. I'm also old so I don't fit any of the identity politics that has been their only true issue. I enjoy truth, education, working toward the good of mankind and ethics in the people that I support and I will NOT vote for her ever.

She couldn't pay me enough to blog for her much less vote for her. I make plenty of money and pay a lot of taxes, but I have children who need a future. Just because I am ok doesn't mean that it is ok for me to not care about my friends, family, and fellow human beings. I was raised right. Doing the right thing isn't easy but it's necessary.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,181 posts)
66. I Made $$$Millions$$$ Bring an A$$hole on the Internet! You Can Too!
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:24 AM
Apr 2016

Hi, my name is Bob. I'm typing this from my palatial mansion in the Hamptons, waiting for my wife, Morgan Fairchild, to return so that we can jet to Aspen for the annual Broken Leg Festival. People ask me, "Bob, how did you get so rich? You're an asshole and never did anything worthwhile in your life. What gives?"

I tell them that I've found THE SECRET TO SUCCE$$ ON THE INTERNET BY BEING AN A$$HOLE.

And now, YOU TOO can ca$h in on this new trend! Why be an asshole for free when you can get paid BIG BUCKS for it?

Political candidates are always looking for new talent to write internet content for blogs, ads, message boards, and email campaigns. Ever hear of "SEND ME A DOLLAR, MADDI! RIGHT NOW! I'M NOT KIDDING, MADDI!"??? Yep, that was me.

And now, I've decided to share my secrets for success. For only $29.95 I'll send you my new course "THE SECRET TO SUCCE$$ ON THE INTERNET BY BEING AN A$$HOLE" by return email. For a limited time, I'll include a list of all current presidential candidates so you can start CASHING IN immediately!

Operators are standing by! This is a limited-time offer and may end at any time! Don't miss out!

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
67. No. Bernie's campaign has paid social media.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:26 AM
Apr 2016

It's not an environment you want to neglect if you are serious.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
68. Unfortunately
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:31 AM
Apr 2016

it seems a little odd that they don't. It's disgusting, deceitful and crass.

It pays the bills I guess. If you have kids at home and need the cash you will sell your soul to protect and provide for your children.

I have the luxury of having no children.

Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
70. It's like the old joke
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 08:27 AM
Apr 2016

about the father who tied a pork chop around a his kid's neck to get the dog to play with him.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
72. Can think of a couple countries that do it.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 08:33 AM
Apr 2016

If it is good enough for the people that brought us Tiananmen square and put an end to the Prague Spring.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
73. Signs of a fearfully weak candidate. Red flags should be waving!
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 08:37 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary, as a candidate is so effing terrible that people have to paid to defend her LMFAO 

No one in Camp Clinton, Inc. realizes just how completely jacked up that mess actually is.  

A candidate so flawed that the ONLY way to make her palatable to the masses is to buy supporters' services. PATHETIC!  


MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
77. Not really. Most national campaigns have paid staff doing that.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 10:00 AM
Apr 2016

Not unusual at all. Even Bernie probably has people who are paid to write things that are positive about him.

Response to reddread (Original post)

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
85. That explains why all the posts that Hillary has won the nomination,
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:24 PM
Apr 2016

they are being paid to lie.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
86. Same kind of candidate that says they have been "endorsed" by some organization
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:27 PM
Apr 2016

when it is only the LEADERSHIP who endorsed them, the few top establishment who have.
Whereas another candidate gets every endorsement by a poll of the MEMBERS of the organization.
EVERY TIME, that is the case.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
100. It takes a lot of distracting when your record sucks.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:21 PM
Apr 2016

Few care to defend her positions and those already distracting reach a smaller and smaller audience as posters realize no substance will be offered and disengage.
It takes a lot of screaming to hide a record that bad or that deep.
If not for " new " posters anything attempting to.defend her indefensible record would be delivered to a shrugging unresponsive majority and a rapid deploying to the huge ignore lists being filled.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
102. Gosh darn it. I really missed the train on this one.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:22 PM
Apr 2016

I've been trying to figure out how to get that fabled nickel a post since 2008.

I could be RICH now!

Dammit!

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
109. Not odd at all.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 07:57 PM
Apr 2016

If I were a candidate with a terrible record, poor likability and even worse trust, I'd spend my campaign cash hiring people to say nice things about me.

Oh, I forgot amoral.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
112. Im thinking they didnt introduce themselves as Hillary supporters BUT
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:52 PM
Apr 2016

whats the difference?
come on.

heres the difference!
I wont have my time wasted by complicit and
necessarily unresponsive souls.
please dont mistake this for rudeness.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»doesnt it seem a little o...