2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumdoesnt it seem a little odd that a candidate pays people to post?
basically chicken shit marketing, but in the broken process of
American democracy, shouldnt this be unacceptable?
or at least a red flag?
Im just a little confused about that.
Awknid
(381 posts)Unicorn
(424 posts)Why would that post get someone kicked off this site?
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Califonz
(465 posts)Sorry, that and the pic juxtaposed was hillaryious
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Cool!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Now with Social Media.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... push his message using social media?
reddread
(6,896 posts)nobody is pretending they arent a Bernie supporter or member of the campaign.
what a sad job some people have to do.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)"nobody is pretending they arent a Bernie supporter or member of the campaign."
reddread
(6,896 posts)online? none of the tells take place.
its pretty easy, theyre shooting for idiots.
at this stage, those tricks are too stale,
but THAT IS ALL BROCK CAN MUSTER.
If I were on a campaign, I would LOVE
that fool Brock for an opponent.
nothing but slime.
not even an issue.
either supreme confidence with their sights on the right
or just damn stupid and empty handed.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)I hear it relentlessly.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I doubt it very much. What do you think?
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)I don't seem to have that feature.....
Amaril
(1,267 posts)You can choose to either just block mail from someone or put them on full ignore (which blocks mail and posts). I guess you could call blocking mail to be a "partial" ignore.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Makes some people feel more important, I guess. I would never ignore anyone that way. It's easy to simply not click on a post or scroll past it.
The ignore feature on DU is designed to help people only see what they agree with. It's a way of avoiding having to face the reality that some people disagree with you.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)My whole mission in life is to turn into a unicorn and prance through a series of completely unrealistic meadows...
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)on Reddit, messageboards, comment sections and Twitter--being bullies and acting like disruptors to anyone who doesn't write positive comments about Hillary.
This is the definition of a paid shill! No one finds this acceptable.
It's like paying people to attend rallies. It's pathetic.
If you don't have enough organic support online--to spread your positive messages or to combat negativity--then you're a flawed candidate.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)They don't spread any message about HRC let alone positive messages about her. They only attack Senator Sanders and his supporters.
If you ask them honest questions as to her positions on issues, all you get is crickets.
Or am I the only one who has seen this time after time?
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)it isn't about propping up the candidate. It's really about demoralizing, disrupting and bullying the supporters of the other candidate. They want them to be frustrated and go away.
That's really what this is about. It always has been.
People who are paid to post like that, don't always have a strong grasp of the issues. They're not paid to dispense knowledge. They're paid to disrupt and silence so the other side gets frustrated, gives up and goes away.
Amaril
(1,267 posts)I've put about 30 of them on ignore recently. Like the saying goes, obvious trolls are obvious.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)The answer to your question is a resounding NO.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)" "
Apparently that is all her supporters need to say. It must be some kind of secret code.
Milestone
(37 posts)I'm pretty sure they've been paying people to post here for years.
reddread
(6,896 posts)were there never laws in place that protected us from media burn?
we didnt get her by accident.
that telecom deregulation worked miracles.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Response to reddread (Original post)
polichick This message was self-deleted by its author.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Well thanks for ruining my night.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Funny, I keep hearing this, and truly some people seem pretty one-track, but I've never figured out how to sign up to get paid anything...
FourScore
(9,704 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She is really revolting
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)That's in short supply in the world of "No we can't"
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)This is HRC's new effort to create jobs.
Of course, we don't know whether they
are well paying ones or not.
(sarc)
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Not sure if articles, abbreviations and prepositions are counted, though.
lostnfound
(16,180 posts)Naiive. The public is best kept deluded and manipulated.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)But, they can't win honestly.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)"Please Clap"?
reddread
(6,896 posts)they were not clapping it up.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)to Revolution Messaging?
see what happens when you hire Americans instead of an offshore call center?
no wonder we need those H1B visas bumped up.
American citizens are simply too greedy.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)talks about what they do for him.
"But theres more to it than that. Sanders has relied on Revolution Messaging and his own digital staff to help build a giant email list of supporters through online ads, videos, shareable graphics and social media posts at key moments in the campaign."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/03/18/revolution-messaging-helps-drive-sanders-political-revolution/81977160/
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)or STFU
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Busing people to caucuses to vote from other states too. Yes I do have proof
:large
Here is his FB. He admits it and talks about it
https://www.facebook.com/LakerGreg
reddread
(6,896 posts)those people were going to fight for Bernie one way or another.
California is a Bernie bulwark.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)brooklynite
(94,591 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)did I?
Check Brock's PR releases why dontcha?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)HDSam
(251 posts)to push pro-Clinton posts and counter anti-Clinton statements. I'd like to say it's surprising, but I've known other people who relied on tossing money around to make friends
What I'd really like to know is if the Clinton campaign is paying any number of website owners to push a pro-Clinton agenda.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)...so, no.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)I put up a poll earlier here in GDP. 82% said they were with Bernie. This site is WAY in favor of Bernie. If Hillary were paying even a handful of people to post, you'd have dozens of sock accounts and Bernie's people would be vastly outnumbered.
reddread
(6,896 posts)and I didnt make it up.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)I just don't think it's happening here.
I also am skeptical of Facebook since I've seen a lot of viciousness that never gets answered.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:39 PM - Edit history (1)
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Surely she can afford to buy the means necessary to have dozens of sock accounts.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Why waste a lot of money on this internet backwater?
msongs
(67,413 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)trudyco
(1,258 posts)This just looks like digital advertising, getting the word out on social media, organizing people, and figuring out how to raise money. Doesn't say anything about posing as a regular citizen and then manipulating peoples' opinions. Quite a different kettle of fish.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)In this case, it's like saying, "C'mon guys, I'm cool! Really!"
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)on some social media site?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Post in a short time period. Do they get the post fed to them in a file and then dumped here on DU?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Whaddaya gonna do?
Baobab
(4,667 posts)This is why they do it and you can also get an idea from this what they do and how they do it.
(if you are smart)
https://www.clear.rice.edu/comp551/papers/HalloyEtAl-RobotsAndRoaches-Science2007.pdf
Seriously.
reddread
(6,896 posts)DookDook
(166 posts)I think it's the only way we'll ever have a free and fair society is to let machines make all the decisions for us. I used to listen to a podcast about trans-humanism and one of the speakers used to talk about how we keep dumping information into the world wide web and we have to wonder what happens if it ever 'wakes-up.'
Baobab
(4,667 posts)nt
DookDook
(166 posts)We were some of the few people in the theater that seemed to enjoy it. Some people weren't too happy with the 'disney' like ending, but I had no problem with it.
Have you seen the movie, Robot and Frank? It was some great hard robot sci-fi. I really loved how they portrayed the near future. It was one of the few robot movies I've seen that didn't invoke Asimov's laws of robotics.
And just so I know that I'll be reimbursed for this, #feelthebern. Almost forgot to add that and then I wouldn't get any of my Bernie Bucks.
(I'm posting this from my Obama-phone)
Half this post is sarcastic.
oasis
(49,389 posts)playing fast and loose with the facts.
wouldn't be prudent.
reddread
(6,896 posts)was that?
glinda
(14,807 posts)lmbradford
(517 posts)I don't think her supporters have been able to articulate any issues that they stand with her on. They say "woman President" or I like the Clintons as if Bill would still govern. I am a woman who proudly stands with Bernie. I'm also old so I don't fit any of the identity politics that has been their only true issue. I enjoy truth, education, working toward the good of mankind and ethics in the people that I support and I will NOT vote for her ever.
She couldn't pay me enough to blog for her much less vote for her. I make plenty of money and pay a lot of taxes, but I have children who need a future. Just because I am ok doesn't mean that it is ok for me to not care about my friends, family, and fellow human beings. I was raised right. Doing the right thing isn't easy but it's necessary.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,181 posts)Hi, my name is Bob. I'm typing this from my palatial mansion in the Hamptons, waiting for my wife, Morgan Fairchild, to return so that we can jet to Aspen for the annual Broken Leg Festival. People ask me, "Bob, how did you get so rich? You're an asshole and never did anything worthwhile in your life. What gives?"
I tell them that I've found THE SECRET TO SUCCE$$ ON THE INTERNET BY BEING AN A$$HOLE.
And now, YOU TOO can ca$h in on this new trend! Why be an asshole for free when you can get paid BIG BUCKS for it?
Political candidates are always looking for new talent to write internet content for blogs, ads, message boards, and email campaigns. Ever hear of "SEND ME A DOLLAR, MADDI! RIGHT NOW! I'M NOT KIDDING, MADDI!"??? Yep, that was me.
And now, I've decided to share my secrets for success. For only $29.95 I'll send you my new course "THE SECRET TO SUCCE$$ ON THE INTERNET BY BEING AN A$$HOLE" by return email. For a limited time, I'll include a list of all current presidential candidates so you can start CASHING IN immediately!
Operators are standing by! This is a limited-time offer and may end at any time! Don't miss out!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)I sent you two checks. Will I receive two lists?
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It's not an environment you want to neglect if you are serious.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)it seems a little odd that they don't. It's disgusting, deceitful and crass.
It pays the bills I guess. If you have kids at home and need the cash you will sell your soul to protect and provide for your children.
I have the luxury of having no children.
reddread
(6,896 posts)I have understood that distinction for a long time
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)about the father who tied a pork chop around a his kid's neck to get the dog to play with him.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)If it is good enough for the people that brought us Tiananmen square and put an end to the Prague Spring.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Hillary, as a candidate is so effing terrible that people have to paid to defend her LMFAO
No one in Camp Clinton, Inc. realizes just how completely jacked up that mess actually is.
A candidate so flawed that the ONLY way to make her palatable to the masses is to buy supporters' services. PATHETIC!
apcalc
(4,465 posts)Ridiculous.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Not unusual at all. Even Bernie probably has people who are paid to write things that are positive about him.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Bunch of damned marijuana addicts.
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4fv43z/hillary_pac_spends_1_million_to_correct/
Response to reddread (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)they are being paid to lie.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)when it is only the LEADERSHIP who endorsed them, the few top establishment who have.
Whereas another candidate gets every endorsement by a poll of the MEMBERS of the organization.
EVERY TIME, that is the case.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Unicorn
(424 posts)Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)I can't believe he is paying me 27$ a word!
Ka-ching!!!!!
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Few care to defend her positions and those already distracting reach a smaller and smaller audience as posters realize no substance will be offered and disengage.
It takes a lot of screaming to hide a record that bad or that deep.
If not for " new " posters anything attempting to.defend her indefensible record would be delivered to a shrugging unresponsive majority and a rapid deploying to the huge ignore lists being filled.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)I've been trying to figure out how to get that fabled nickel a post since 2008.
I could be RICH now!
Dammit!
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)If I were a candidate with a terrible record, poor likability and even worse trust, I'd spend my campaign cash hiring people to say nice things about me.
Oh, I forgot amoral.
reddread
(6,896 posts)you should mention
https://www.google.com/#q=removing+blood+stains
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)whats the difference?
come on.
heres the difference!
I wont have my time wasted by complicit and
necessarily unresponsive souls.
please dont mistake this for rudeness.