Getting Warren to be VP under Hillary would be the best way for Wall Street to muzzle her voice.

[reformist2]

It would take her out of the Senate and pull her off of all those committees. And she'd have no ability to shape policy anymore.

Even worse, since the VP position is often seen as the "cheerleader" position for whatever policies the president is supporting, it would force Warren into the distasteful position of defending all of Hillary's half-assed proposals that actually protect Wall Street interests.

I don't think Elizabeth Warren would be so foolish as to think the Vice President position is worth a damn. At least I hope she isn't. But if she is, it would be an excellent way for the powers that be to stifle one of the strongest voices for reform in a generation.

So Liz, just say NO to the VP position if offered.... unless it's BERNIE offering it to you, then by all means, say YES!!!

[ViseGrip]

1. BINGO! Liz is not an idiot!

[quantumjunkie]

2. NO CHANCE -- Warren has always criticized Hillary's bottomless corruption

As we all know from that famous video, Warren has always criticized Hillary for becoming corrupt and taking big money from the banks. Of course Hillary would like Warren to be her cheerleader VP because as you said it would remove her biggest critic when she gets into office and commences more cash funnelling.

She'd be much more valuable in the Senate or, preferably, as President.

[notadmblnd]

3. I said as much earlier. I also said I think Senator Warren is smarter than that.

I'm thinking she owes Wassermann-Schultz- her pardner in crime, big time. And she'd get a two-fer. Female and first AA VP.

[Art_from_Ark]

4. Yeah, she'd always have to be playing second fiddle to Hillary

[Agnosticsherbet]

5. I think Warren would make a great VP for Clinton.

I am sure that, if asked, she will give the chance a great deal of thought and decide on a course that is best for her goals and agenda as a Senator and Public Servant.

[oldandhappy]

6. clinton will not have a veep that can out shine her.

clinton demands loyalty over truth, obedience over any original thinking.

[Eric J in MN]

7. I disagree. Elizabeth Warren probably won't be the VP nominee

...because Clinton's Wall Street donors wouldn't want Warren to have more access to the president than they do.

[whatchamacallit]

8. I agree, she'd be flushing her reputation down the toilet

Bad move all around.

[rhett o rick]

9. It won't be offered. Goldman-Sachs hold the top spot for the VP under H. Clinton.

It's the least she can do and most likely the least she will do.

[djean111]

10. That would not induce anybody to change their mind and vote for Hillary.

But I bet the idea is juicy porn for Wall Street and the Third Way - relegating Warren to dinners and funerals, and getting this "out of hand" woman out of the Senate.

It would be a desperate, cynical, pandering move. No sale.