Debby Schultz: Clinton Used Private Email The Same Way as Previous Secretaries of State … (Video)

[insta8er]

Other Than the Private Server’

[vintx]

1. Is she stupid or lying?

Other SoS's used private email.

Not private email SERVERS.

Can these people seriously be this stupid? Or are they really just shameless fucking liars?


EDIT: LOL, I see, she got to it later.

What a fucking bullshit slinging scam artist. I fucking hate her so much. She needs to retire and go away. Far, far away.

[insta8er]

2. I didn't want to say it, but the way she is conducting herself on camera I would guess

she is lying!....Lets see how long we can keep this video up here.

[vintx]

3. Yep I saw how she later admitted she was just being a fucking liar.

Fucking pathetic. Con artists. Shameless con artists.

[insta8er]

7. And this is the "impartial" one who is making sure that both candidates are being fairly treated.

I can see why people accuse her of having her thumb on the scale for HRC, the way she is defending her is beyond being impartial.

When did this country become one that is supporting the people that so clearly are gaming the system?

[vintx]

11. Yes, anyone with two brain cells to rub together has seen right through her

right from the moment she announced the primary schedule. If not before.

Loathe is too soft a word. I absolutely abhor her.

[kgnu_fan]

22. she is bad.

[Demsrule86]

8. I guess you are stupid

Colin Powell said it was true on MSNBC and her is an article from News Week Feb 2016

The shocking truth about the last two Republican secretaries of state has finally come out: Colin Powell and aides to Condoleezza Rice trafficked in classified information on their personal email accounts. This is an enormous scandal!Oh, wait. No, it’s not.This news involving Powell and Rice is meaningless except that it sets up a rational conversation (finally) about the Hillary Clinton bogus “email-gate” imbroglio. Perhaps the partisans on each side will now be more willing to listen to the facts. From the beginning, the “scandal” about Clinton using a personal email account when she was secretary of state—including the finding that a few documents on it were retroactively deemed classified—has been a big nothing-burger perpetuated for partisan purposes, with reports spooned out by Republicans attempting to deceive or acting out of ignorance. Conservative commentators have raged, presidential candidates have fallen over themselves in apoplectic babbling, and some politicians have proclaimed that Clinton should be in jail for mishandling classified information. The nonsense has been never-ending, and attempts to cut through the fog of duplicity have been fruitless.

[vintx]

14. There is a HUGE difference between an email ACCOUNT and an email SERVER.

I guess we know why you're still spewing this nonsense. At least you're not a fucking liar.

[insta8er]

18. Man you do follow the Hillton drum to the exact beat, if you were to immerse yourself in anything

that is not controlled by the Hill gang, you would come to know that there are no documents being retro actively made classified.
The reason for this is...wait for it...wait for it..let me use capital letters so you might not miss it.. PRIVATE SERVER....That does not have any classification system installed on it. ONLY GOVERNMENT SERVERS have CLASSIFICATION Systems and triggers. So everything that was on that PRIVATE SERVER was not Classified on that system. BUT WAS CLASSIFIED ON THE GOVERNMENT SERVERS. I am in IT myself, if you need a crash course I will point you out to where you can read up on it.

[AzDar]

20. Why not both?

[bkkyosemite]

32. She is hoping the viewers will believe her and many do because they don't research what is

going on.

[TM99]

4. What a bold faced liar she is.

No, this is not the same.

A private email account is not the same as a private email server.

This woman need to be out on her ass really fucking soon!

[TheBlackAdder]

5. Information that is subject to subpoena, or information from hearsay?

[Autumn]

6. She's a liar. No other SOS mixed their "charity" personal and SOS business

in their private e mail and ran it through their private server to avoid FOIA requests.

[amborin]

9. Liar

[HooptieWagon]

10. Other SoS didn't exchange classified information with non-clearanced people...

...like Clinton did with Blumenthall, possibly others. And other SoS didn't form a slush fund to handle quid pro quo 'donations' from corporations and foreign govts with business pending in State Dept.

BTW...DWS is a liar. She lies constantly. You can tell she's lying because her lips are moving.

[Tarc]

12. You know you've lost the argument when you have to defend Fox News

in order to attack Hillary Clinton.

[snowy owl]

28. So you're in the box for MSNBC? Both are opinion. Better to diversify...you're smarter when you do.

[bkkyosemite]

33. It was not Fox News that spoke it was Ms. Debbie in her own words.

[djean111]

13. She is a liar. n/t

[Skwmom]

15. Ms. Payday Lender has no problem telling a lie.

[snowy owl]

16. Saw this. Wallace is good. I need to send more money to Canova.

Did you notice the fast smile at the very beginning? She is just so false. It was a real effort to show support for both candidates, wasn't it DWS?

[Dem2]

17. OK, I see your purpose here

[insta8er]

19. Hey Dem2..wondered when you were going to show up...

[sadoldgirl]

21. K&R

Thanks for posting this.

[FlatBaroque]

23. Loathsome turd /

[awake]

24. Bull shit John Kerry has never used personal email for Goverment business

Debby Schultz is a real pice of work, and she is incharge of running the DNC, what a tragedy.

[snowy owl]

25. The lying is so hard to take, isn't it. They get away with it by an uninformed electorate.

[Lizzie Poppet]

26. What a lying POS she is.

[whatchamacallit]

27. God I hate that POS

[840high]

29. +100

[jfern]

30. And other than the classified information

How was the play besides that, Mrs. Lincoln?

[onecaliberal]

31. Lying POS

[MisterP]

34. if you admit that there's a difference between having a different email address

and setting up a secret server in your house's basement, then you can't be a glassy-eyed votary dedicated to destroying every principle of the party to ensure a coronation

duh!

[beedle]

35. Back in the late 80's early 90s I set up a few classified systems

I'm not sure at all if this still works the same way as it used to but I would suspect that it would still make sense to operate in a similar fashion.


You and your ID are classified at a certain 'security level', let's say for the sake of an example I have a security level of "6".

All my communications are also by default at 'level 6', meaning that by default only people at security level 6 or above will be able to access my documents, and I will not be able to send even an email to anyone at a level less than 6.

If I tried to send an email to a level 5 or lower person the system would automatically prevent me from doing so, coming back with a message warning me with a gentle reminder of my attempt to breach security protocol.

So, if I want to send an email or document to a level 5 or lower I would be reminded that I need to review what I am sending to make sure that the information was suitable for someone under my security classification to view. The system couldn't decide that (unless of course I was attempting to forward an email or document from someone else with the same or higher classification, in which case I would just be refused, the owner of the original email or document would be the only person able to lower the security level on their documents or emails - well, there were other ways, but it needed to go up the chain to happen.)

If I reviewed my document and decided that all the level 6 classified info was either removed, or was actually suitable to a lower security level I would have to temporarily lower my personal security level on the system, to the level that I was attempting to send the information to .. so if I though I needed to send an email to a level 5 person to say invite them to lunch, I would set my security level to 5 and send the email (soon as I finished that single function my security level was immediately returned to a level 6 to make sure I didn't accidentally send out level 6 info to other level 5 people.)

Okay, so that's probably a little long winded and not really that relevant on on modern systems, but security level systems, be they computer or otherwise should still work in a similar fashion. The information you handle is automatically at YOUR security level, and you need to explicitly lower the security level if you are passing it on to others of a lower security level, and that process needs to be documented or at least recorded.

A private system in your basement is highly unlikely to meet the requirements of the a government department such as the State Department, meaning every single email sent from the system was in breach of security protocols. Yeah, it's possible that nothing was passed on to people of the wrong security level, unlikely but possible, but just the fact that there was no audit trail available to confirm this assertion would make it a serious breach of security.

Now maybe things have changed from the early 90's, maybe there are no more security levels and State Department security protocols are just a 'best efforts' things these days ... again, that's highly unlikely, and no matter how low the standards have fallen, I still have serious doubts your average basement server Windows IT admin is up to the task of keeping a certified secure system up and running to DoD level standards (especially since we know for sure that they didn't even use a fucking certificate to encrypt their communications for a good part of the servers existence.)