2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat IS THIS? Bernie's Votes Going Down... CAUGHT LIVE! Screen Shots In Article!
https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/2016/04/26/election-live-results-observers-catch-sanders-votes-going-down-screen-shot/Election "shenanigans" have been going on for a long time... THIS would appear to be one more example... Counting is merely ADDING to in this case TWO columns. Votes are either added to one candidate or the other. There is no other mathematical function involved... PERIOD! Yet time and again we witness this CRAP! Check out the screen shots provided in this article.
As a candidate for congress in 2006, I witnessed the same sort of thing going on LIVE in returns in my election. We did not screen shot it though.
THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY! Can someone please copy and paste the screen shots into the comments. THIS IS IMPORTANT!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Dem2
(8,178 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)they went.
How did Bernie have 6247 votes in Sussex county and a little bit later had 2383?
Where did his 3,864 votes go?
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Out AND OUT THIEVERY!
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 27, 2016, 10:12 AM - Edit history (1)
Somebody is taking data in and it gets fed into their system. You don't think they make mistakes? That results are accidentally sent to the wrong precinct, or that the person doing the data entry fat-fingeed it?
what exactly are you asserting? Any evidence of problems in the actual official returns?
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)She was on top all the way and all of a sudden SHE lost votes in one swoop. It was Hillary who suddenly lost votes, I was watching the screen when it happened and couldn't believe it. Then the numbers were restored within the next update. So everyone should take a deep breath. Bernie had nothing taken or stolen from him. But this kind of innuendo helps Trump and I am sure that Bernie supporters will push it all the way. And no explanation will satisfy them.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)STRICT CRITERIA that allows review under ONLY the most tight and unreasonable circumstances!
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)You cannot go any higher than 100%! The 112% is when the "reallocating" of vote totals is taking place!
Fuck the "Establishment" and their bought and paid for willing candidate!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
randome
(34,845 posts)(I bet there are quite a few here and that would be sad.)
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...like he did in every other State where his supporters claimed voter fraud.
Won't he?
riversedge
(73,379 posts)jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)...if it werent for you meddling bloggers!
djean111
(14,255 posts)No way around that. Ever.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)She wins fair and square and is rated the most honest candidate of 2016.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)And is pleased that so many are receptive to GOP propaganda.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Tarc
(10,579 posts)With a graphic, with a caption, with data or so on. Sweet fucking jesus on a pogo stick, do you really think the tv channel there is being hacked real-time by Hillary supporters? Are they "stealing" the votes bite by bit...or byte by byte in this case...as you watch live?
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)They did this shit in 2002,2004, 2006, 2008-2012 the local races got maneuvered. On and on. This thread should be jumping!
This is the same activity reported and screen shot in the NY primary on TV. Typos again?
Dem2
(8,178 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm from Florida... THIS IS Better Known As... VOTE FLIPPING!
NO DEMOCRACY PERIOD!!!!
Dem2
(8,178 posts)Your faux outrage is quite entertaining, thank you
jillan
(39,451 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)already with the 1st debate setting, continued with the
"computer glitch" in August + October.(no investigation),
The raw counts in IA were never published, etc., etc.
This whole primary has been a sham from the beginning
on, and the party establishment has been doing it, imo.
They just wanted us to believe that we had a choice.
Fresh_Start
(11,342 posts)for example the 112% reporting example isn't an error it proves your case.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Five views of one sign, onr possibly but not probably genuine, a testament to very limited capabilities with Photoshop.
Your post is a smear, but not an artful one. Downright clumsy, but apparently the best you have.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)they know they can get away with it and there is no one gonna stop them. They must be laughing their asses off.