Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:56 AM May 2016

Why arent't Bernie's yuuuuge rallies.....

Translating into votes? Any rational answers for this? He should have blown Hillary out of the water by now if all hus rally goers showed up to vote and yet he is behind by over 3 million votes. What gives?

92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why arent't Bernie's yuuuuge rallies..... (Original Post) Txbluedog May 2016 OP
They are. Bernie won both Indiana and West Virginia. JDPriestly May 2016 #1
In caucuses he has and in many states he has and California is yet to come. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #2
He's a surprise, but not his success. There's enough hatred of Hillary that someone would benefit. CrowCityDem May 2016 #8
But he didnt create that hate, he benefited but the hate was created by the GOP Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #12
Admission is the start of addressing a problem timmymoff May 2016 #17
the fatal flaw is those who wont vote for the democrat, many will die as a result Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #20
Seems Hillary has quite a record of killing timmymoff May 2016 #27
Wrong Shadowflash May 2016 #81
You will be supporting Drumpf, SHAME on you Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #83
Where did you get THAT idea? Shadowflash May 2016 #85
So DRumpf it is, I see Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #86
*sigh* Shadowflash May 2016 #91
So DRumpf it is, I see Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #92
I said people hate her. Many are brainwashed by RW smears. Some by Bernie's smears. CrowCityDem May 2016 #21
He won't win California Txbluedog May 2016 #11
He does and he deserves that problem. Not because he isnt a civil rights proponent, he is, Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #15
California will NOT vote for Bernie. We didn't go for the b.s. in 2010 and remained Democratic, even BlueCaliDem May 2016 #13
A strong case could be made for Brown being the best governor in the country. LonePirate May 2016 #64
I would make that case. Absolutely. Our Legislature is pretty progressive, and have kept him in line BlueCaliDem May 2016 #66
Voter suppression. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #3
To the tune of 3 million plus votes Txbluedog May 2016 #6
Yup. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #10
So you has no basis in reality then Txbluedog May 2016 #14
I don't expect you to believe it. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #22
Well, apparently you're trying your damnedest. Sorry. No sale. eom BlueCaliDem May 2016 #16
I wouldn't want to sell to you anyway. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #23
And now you're having a temper-tantrum. So typical. BlueCaliDem May 2016 #28
I'm perfectly calm, but thanks. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #29
GUARDS! KingFlorez May 2016 #32
And you're having another self-inflicted conniption. BlueCaliDem May 2016 #39
I'm still perfectly calm. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #42
Sure you are. That's why you immediately came out swinging with your little gratuitous snarks. Caps BlueCaliDem May 2016 #46
You keep shouting...and yet I'm calm. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #47
You keep closing your ears off, dear one, and come June 7th, I'll close mine off BlueCaliDem May 2016 #53
You're so angry. Why do you yell so much? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #56
And he keeps closing his ears off...also typical of a Sanders supporter. *sigh* BlueCaliDem May 2016 #63
Now you're repeating yourself and talking in the wrong person. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #65
Aaaand...he keeps those ears closed... tsk tsk BlueCaliDem May 2016 #67
Are you talking to your ring? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #69
Aaaaand...he keeps those ears firmly closed still...awww... BlueCaliDem May 2016 #70
He failed to convince them with his rhetoric that he is Presidential livetohike May 2016 #4
Exactly. Sanders, a faux-Democrat, hasn't been able to sell his brand to people who actually BlueCaliDem May 2016 #31
Seems to be getting votes to me. He'll have mine, and many others. arcane1 May 2016 #5
And he's still lost. What does that tell you? BlueCaliDem May 2016 #34
Because those are his only voters, most of the time! CrowCityDem May 2016 #7
So hillary is picking up the new voters? timmymoff May 2016 #24
New, old, doesn't matter. She has MORE voters, and that's what counts. #FeelTheMath CrowCityDem May 2016 #26
More now and losing them daily. wooohoooo timmymoff May 2016 #30
Bernie helped her?? Since when is tarring someone help? CrowCityDem May 2016 #33
yes, by new voter registrtion timmymoff May 2016 #43
Bull. The "new" voter registration has a lot to do with new laws of automatic registration AND BlueCaliDem May 2016 #48
Nope I loved them giving back to her the tone she tried to set. timmymoff May 2016 #52
Senator Boxer is deeply loved in California. Those screamers at the Convention tried to shout her BlueCaliDem May 2016 #60
Because in most states, attendees at the rally did not vote in a Democratic Primary. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #9
And they never intended on doing so. I'll be damned if I help elect a President Trump. eom BlueCaliDem May 2016 #36
I feel exactly the same. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #38
Say hi to Dave for me! Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #18
The number of people who vote is much Eric J in MN May 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #25
I have not used my ignore button yet, because this is so hilariously by-the-Brock. djean111 May 2016 #40
If you read all my postings.... Txbluedog May 2016 #45
You sound a little like a frustrated authoritarian to me. djean111 May 2016 #49
uh huh xloadiex May 2016 #57
He just did not appeal to enough of the Democratic base to win KingFlorez May 2016 #35
He appealed to 9 million +of them timmymoff May 2016 #44
There aren't enough angry Sanders supporters out there to have an impact KingFlorez May 2016 #50
Sanders supporters arent the only people she has to worry about not voting for her timmymoff May 2016 #55
Where is that great post where the guy listed the votes. pdsimdars May 2016 #37
Yes but why is WA's results not replicated in other states Txbluedog May 2016 #41
Don't get what you're saying. pdsimdars May 2016 #74
The point of the OP is just to poke at Bernie's supporters. djean111 May 2016 #76
True, true. pdsimdars May 2016 #87
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #54
Beer pong ? Trust Buster May 2016 #51
Obama explained it in his Correspondents' Dinner joke re Hillary. LAS14 May 2016 #58
I've Been Seeing Here For The Longest Time That Bernie Is Behind By Over 3 Million Votes..... global1 May 2016 #59
Here you go ContinentalOp May 2016 #72
Do we feel confident that the votes are counted correctly? What about the people who had their Skwmom May 2016 #61
Yes three million plus Bernie votes were not counted....lol Txbluedog May 2016 #62
Of all the dumb memes whatchamacallit May 2016 #68
Because DWS etal. has a stranglehold on the caucus/primary system. Hiraeth May 2016 #71
The biggest rallies are in states with big populations. ContinentalOp May 2016 #73
Are "Translating into votes". Hes not in single digits, is he? 30-40% won't win, but he can keep on Sunlei May 2016 #75
Well, for one, independents kaleckim May 2016 #77
I'd go to a Bernie rally... Mike Nelson May 2016 #78
Seems that's why most people go to those rallies — for fun and to see what's up brush May 2016 #90
He's had some well organized rallies. People are curious, I'd probably go if it were convienient The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #79
Undemocratic closed primaries. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #80
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #82
These same type of occurances happened to Ron Paul, I still have not seen a President Ron Paul. Thinkingabout May 2016 #84
To begin with you have to remember where Bernie started jwirr May 2016 #88
"You guys are funny Just asked the question to gauge a response" .99center May 2016 #89

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
1. They are. Bernie won both Indiana and West Virginia.
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

He started out with next-to-no name recognition and now is well known across the country.

Bernie's campaign has been amazingly successful.

And Bernie is a good manager.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
2. In caucuses he has and in many states he has and California is yet to come.
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

Admit please that what he and his people accomplished you and I and just about everybody would have thought impossible a year ago
As much as I wanted this and have for a long time, (been a Bernie fan longer than most have known who he is) I didnt think it was possible.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
12. But he didnt create that hate, he benefited but the hate was created by the GOP
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:04 PM
May 2016

over a 25 year campaign, it is used here by the dozens of GOP trolls that work here spreading it.

Among other places.


 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
17. Admission is the start of addressing a problem
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:06 PM
May 2016

like your candidate. Thank you for finally admitting she is a fatally flawed candidate. We appreciate your honesty.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
20. the fatal flaw is those who wont vote for the democrat, many will die as a result
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:07 PM
May 2016

they will be personally responsible

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
27. Seems Hillary has quite a record of killing
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016

don't she? Iraq, Syria, Libya, Honduras. Care to sell this myth of people dying by not voting Hillary some more? Or do you just intend on perpetuating the same tired tale of an apologist? It's truly your call.

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
85. Where did you get THAT idea?
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:47 PM
May 2016

He is even more flawed than she is.

It IS possible for BOTH choices to be unacceptable.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
15. He does and he deserves that problem. Not because he isnt a civil rights proponent, he is,
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:05 PM
May 2016

but because he went about it ALL wrong, still is.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
13. California will NOT vote for Bernie. We didn't go for the b.s. in 2010 and remained Democratic, even
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:04 PM
May 2016

adding seats to our Assembly and Senate - unlike other so-called 'liberal' States - and we elected a moderate Democrat as our governor.

After the disrespect shown by Sanders supporters against our beloved Senator Boxer, you think a socialist-disguised-as-a-Democrat-so-he-could-be-president; a man who can't inspire the African-American or Latino vote; a man who allows his followers to heckle one of our most beloved Democrats, will win from the battle-tested Democrat, Hillary Clinton?? In what universe?

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
64. A strong case could be made for Brown being the best governor in the country.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:04 PM
May 2016

Of course, having a mostly cooperative legislature and a citizenry who prefers solving major problems instead of debating life's trivialities has also helped Brown. Still, he has a great record.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
66. I would make that case. Absolutely. Our Legislature is pretty progressive, and have kept him in line
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

when he wanted to veer off a bit to the dark side. He and Kamala Harris, the candidate running for Senator Boxer's seat now, have clashed a couple of times. She turned out to be more progressive than him.

However, Governor Brown listens to his legislature and is open to compromise. He doesn't march off angrily when he doesn't get his way. He listens, debates, and comes to a compromise that will help the State. That's what a president should do as well - be willing to work with the U.S. Congress (to a point) to get things done for the country, rather than staunchly stick to "his principles".

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
22. I don't expect you to believe it.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:08 PM
May 2016

It is in your best interest not to. That doesn't make it any less true. Just look at the exit polls.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
28. And now you're having a temper-tantrum. So typical.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016

Still...no sale. And all that smearing the Democratic Party nominee (according to MATH) isn't going to help you or your little revolution.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
39. And you're having another self-inflicted conniption.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:19 PM
May 2016

I truly feel sorry for you, being so angry all the time.

And my math only sucks to those who don't understand it.

Here's the bottom line: BERNIE HAS LOST. BIG TIME. Does that give you the sadz?

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
42. I'm still perfectly calm.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:26 PM
May 2016

And I'm not the one using caps. You should chill out a bit, your blood pressure seems high. Maybe take a break and read a book, I suggest a math one. Start with the basics and work your way up.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
46. Sure you are. That's why you immediately came out swinging with your little gratuitous snarks. Caps
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:32 PM
May 2016

are used to SHOUT online, and that's exactly why I used them. They're not used to show anger. I'm sorry you fail to understand that. But that could explain why you don't understand MATH. You'd otherwise know that the faux-Dem LOST.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
53. You keep closing your ears off, dear one, and come June 7th, I'll close mine off
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:40 PM
May 2016

when the loud wailing of loss rises from the Sanders campaign when Democrats give Hillary Clinton my State.

I have no need for bluster. I'm a Hillary Clinton supporter and SHE HAS WON.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
56. You're so angry. Why do you yell so much?
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:43 PM
May 2016

Your posts are kind of disturbing. Wailing and gnashing of teeth...you are coming from a dark place

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
65. Now you're repeating yourself and talking in the wrong person.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:08 PM
May 2016

Severe anger management issues, Tourettes like yelling, speech repetition, talking to imaginary people, loss of logic and math faculties. I'm not a doctor, but I'm sure if you see a specialist they'll help you through these difficult times.

livetohike

(22,165 posts)
4. He failed to convince them with his rhetoric that he is Presidential
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:00 PM
May 2016

material. They came,they saw, they voted - for Hillary.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
31. Exactly. Sanders, a faux-Democrat, hasn't been able to sell his brand to people who actually
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:13 PM
May 2016

follow politics and know how our gov't works. Only the idealists and clueless are so easily sold on his vision for a tyrannical utopia for the United States.

It's what I love about the African-American community: they see the snake oil for what it is.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
34. And he's still lost. What does that tell you?
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:16 PM
May 2016

I'd rather vote for a winner who can actually get things done. I don't know about you, but I'm in no position to play "let's turn the U.S. into a giant experiment for socialism". I need my gov't to actually work for me. I can't afford to sit back and watch chaos happen with a lame-duck presidency for four years.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
24. So hillary is picking up the new voters?
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:08 PM
May 2016

She has peaked in performance, but never fear, she is seeking the gop donors now, in true democratic party fashion. Well, at least the Clinton brand of the democratic party (conservative wing) .

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
30. More now and losing them daily. wooohoooo
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:12 PM
May 2016

she has peaked. she was never going to garner anymore than she already had. Bernie tried to help her, but she chose the gop and their money over us. Let the fruit rot on the vine.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
43. yes, by new voter registrtion
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:26 PM
May 2016

and by not bringing up her emails. And by not pointing out her real record. He's been really soft on her moreso than us in here. But hey, she's been vetted what could anything Bernie has to say possibly harm her? or are you really just whining and want both sides of the issue, like her? Weak my friend, weak.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
48. Bull. The "new" voter registration has a lot to do with new laws of automatic registration AND
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:36 PM
May 2016

nowhere did an article break down the voter registrations that show they're all Sanders followers. If you're talking about "independents" registering to vote for Sanders, then that's a weak position because they unregistered themselves immediately thereafter - which is what Republicans do after they try and muck up the Democratic Party nomination process, and which is why they didn't succeed at stealing NV for Sanders as they had hoped - hence the shouting at Senator Boxer last Saturday. Missed that, did you?

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
52. Nope I loved them giving back to her the tone she tried to set.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:40 PM
May 2016

I thought it was great and well deserved, Someone of her position talking down to people showed how sad the Hillary campaign has become. she didn't enjoy the medicine she earned. Tough cookies. As far as registrations and Bernie owning the youth vote, I noticed you chose to ignore that. So enjoy the bed you made. he tried to help but many Hillary supporters have said they do not even want our vote, and many of us are likely to oblige them. You are earning this loss , enjoy.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
60. Senator Boxer is deeply loved in California. Those screamers at the Convention tried to shout her
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:54 PM
May 2016

down because she refuses to tow their line, and we Californians won't take kindly to that display of disrespect for one of the most liberal Senators, who stood with the CBC against G.W. Bush when they tried to ratify the (stolen) Ohio vote in 2004.

Heck, even poor but misguided Sanders-surrogate Nina Turner was 'booed' when she tried to gingerly ask that we unite. We can do without those bullies. Better they join the Tea Party where they'll be welcomed if they can't grow up and act like adults.

Response to Txbluedog (Original post)

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
40. I have not used my ignore button yet, because this is so hilariously by-the-Brock.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:22 PM
May 2016

And because it is wasted effort, doesn't work at DU, at all. Sorta like a fruit fly, little tiny buzzing around.

 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
45. If you read all my postings....
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:29 PM
May 2016

You will know I started on this site because of the lemmings that I have to work with who are so broke supporting Sanders that they have no money to eat, so stressed out over his results that they are failing classes and yet are continuing to contribute to the Sanders campaign under the false hope that he is going to win and somehow magically erase their student debts and give them free college

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
49. You sound a little like a frustrated authoritarian to me.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:36 PM
May 2016

You should get some help with that. Seriously.
And barking and sniping at DU does not make Hillary look any better, I promise you.

Oh, and my 21 YO grandson supports Bernie and is fully aware that some of Bernie's agenda means higher taxes, and thinks it would be totally worth it. Others of his friends are riled up about the TPP. Perhaps talking directly to your friends and telling them that you disagree with their own personal choices would be more useful to you.

Unless you really think your little posts here will put a halt to Bernie's campaign and support? bwhahahaha! You need to aim lower.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
35. He just did not appeal to enough of the Democratic base to win
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:16 PM
May 2016

It's as simple as that. And when you factor in his refusal to do retail campaigning, you get an even clearer answer.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
44. He appealed to 9 million +of them
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:28 PM
May 2016

Are you saying you don't want those votes. I'm sure we could accommodate those wishes if they are truly your wishes.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
50. There aren't enough angry Sanders supporters out there to have an impact
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:37 PM
May 2016

Just like Hillary is 44 didn't derail Obama, angry Sanders supporters won't derail Clinton.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
55. Sanders supporters arent the only people she has to worry about not voting for her
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

so enjoy the bed you and her campaign have made. We tried to warn you. I'd say you better get busy selling the corporate queen to America, help is going to be a luxury.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
37. Where is that great post where the guy listed the votes.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:17 PM
May 2016

For instance, did you know that Bernie won Washington state by 40% (70.6 percent to 29.2 percent)? And did you also know that he got ZERO votes added for that?
There were a number of states like that. He won by Yuuuuuge margins, and got ZERO votes. I think it was because they were caucuses.





This clearly shows where the enthusiasm is.


.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
74. Don't get what you're saying.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:20 PM
May 2016

I gave the only example I could remember but there were other states where Bernie got a huge win and no votes were given. I think it was becasue they were caucus states and the people didn't vote. But I think they should do something besides giving him no votes.
In any case, those totals aren't the rock solid concrete people think they are. I mean, look at those crowds. Bernie has the mojo.

Response to pdsimdars (Reply #37)

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
58. Obama explained it in his Correspondents' Dinner joke re Hillary.
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:52 PM
May 2016

ttp://www.vox.com/2016/5/1/11549570/obama-correspondents-dinner-joke

global1

(25,285 posts)
59. I've Been Seeing Here For The Longest Time That Bernie Is Behind By Over 3 Million Votes.....
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:52 PM
May 2016

Though there have been other primaries run since the first time 3 million was mentioned - the 3 million number never seems to change. I'm wondering if this is just a bogus talking point or if it is a valid number.

I've never seen proof of this 3 million number here nor learn how this is computed. Can anyone provide where these three million votes have come from (states?)?

And isn't there a difference in the fact that caucuses have fewer participants - yet Bernie has won his fair share of caucuses?

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
72. Here you go
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:08 PM
May 2016
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_vote_count.html

This doesn't include caucuses. I added up the caucuses on another thread and Bernie gets about an extra 200k lead from those, so it's really more like 2.9 million probably.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
61. Do we feel confident that the votes are counted correctly? What about the people who had their
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:55 PM
May 2016

registration changed without their knowledge?
 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
62. Yes three million plus Bernie votes were not counted....lol
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:58 PM
May 2016

Do you need to change your tin fil hat every day or is it reusable

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
73. The biggest rallies are in states with big populations.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:15 PM
May 2016

The rally attendance is really nothing compared to the population of those areas.

30,000 people in Seattle = less than 1% of WA voters and only 18% of people who actually voted for him in the WA caucus.
30,000 in NYC = only 1% of registered Dems in New York City
30,000 in Sacramento = 6% of registered Dem in Sacramento county

You just have to put it in perspective. The big rallies make for good photo ops, but they don't mean much in big cities were millions of people live.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
75. Are "Translating into votes". Hes not in single digits, is he? 30-40% won't win, but he can keep on
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:25 PM
May 2016

Unlike Republicans stage full! of contenders, Neither of our candidates are quitters.

kaleckim

(651 posts)
77. Well, for one, independents
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:28 PM
May 2016

make up a larger share of the public, he does much, much better than she does with independents, and that group has largely been excluded from your party's voting process by design. It also seems that her corruption, center-right record, hawkish foreign policy and the chance that she can be indicted by the FBI are not problems with many in her party. If that's the case, and if Sanders is already going against the most powerful (and corrupt) Democratic family, with massive amounts of money, name recognition and establishment support, it's amazing he's gotten this far. He is trying to appeal to people that clearly don't share his values. He has because of his message and because of how horrible of a candidate she is. The fact that so many Democrats don't see the obvious says a lot about them and what their party has become. The general public supports him far more than Clinton and is more supportive of the most progressive candidate in the race than the Democratic Party. The left doesn't have a home with either of the two parties, and hasn't since HRC and her husband rose to power.

Mike Nelson

(9,973 posts)
78. I'd go to a Bernie rally...
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

...Bernie's rallies look like fun! ...maybe a Trump rally... might be fun for the spectacle. That doesn't necessarily mean they'll get my vote.

brush

(53,925 posts)
90. Seems that's why most people go to those rallies — for fun and to see what's up
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:16 PM
May 2016

Voting seems to be an after thought.

Those huge rallies, btw, cost big bucks, with the rental and security and clean-up and all.

That's where all the $27 donations go, besides Weaver's and Devine's retirement accounts.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
79. He's had some well organized rallies. People are curious, I'd probably go if it were convienient
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:31 PM
May 2016

it doesn't mean that I would vote for him.

Response to Txbluedog (Original post)

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
84. These same type of occurances happened to Ron Paul, I still have not seen a President Ron Paul.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:40 PM
May 2016

It is a libertarian type drive, the groups traveled from place to place cheering Ron Paul and then when the date came to vote in the primaries, the large crowds did not show up. He is not the first to have really large crowds and not get elected. His agenda does not attract enough of the people who voted.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
88. To begin with you have to remember where Bernie started
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:55 PM
May 2016

out and where he is now. Most of the states he lost to her were lost by a very small margin. Iowa for instance was lost by 1 10th of a percent. And in many of them there were voting problems favoring Hillary that have been challenged by the Bernie campaign. Many of the ones he did win are by good sized margins.

What we are beginning to see in the conventions is another form of voting problems again favoring Hillary and not very legal as in NV.

.99center

(1,237 posts)
89. "You guys are funny Just asked the question to gauge a response"
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:00 PM
May 2016

Are you going to admit to trolling us once again?
Your whole point of being here seems to be to disrupt and make fun of those silly liberals for participating in our Democracy, while seeing how many people supporting Hillary will post in agreement to your "Moderate" views.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why arent't Bernie's yuuu...