2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy arent't Bernie's yuuuuge rallies.....
Translating into votes? Any rational answers for this? He should have blown Hillary out of the water by now if all hus rally goers showed up to vote and yet he is behind by over 3 million votes. What gives?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)He started out with next-to-no name recognition and now is well known across the country.
Bernie's campaign has been amazingly successful.
And Bernie is a good manager.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Admit please that what he and his people accomplished you and I and just about everybody would have thought impossible a year ago
As much as I wanted this and have for a long time, (been a Bernie fan longer than most have known who he is) I didnt think it was possible.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)over a 25 year campaign, it is used here by the dozens of GOP trolls that work here spreading it.
Among other places.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)like your candidate. Thank you for finally admitting she is a fatally flawed candidate. We appreciate your honesty.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)they will be personally responsible
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)don't she? Iraq, Syria, Libya, Honduras. Care to sell this myth of people dying by not voting Hillary some more? Or do you just intend on perpetuating the same tired tale of an apologist? It's truly your call.
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)It will be the fault of people who nominated a deeply flawed and untrustworthy candidate.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)He is even more flawed than she is.
It IS possible for BOTH choices to be unacceptable.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)It's like talking to a brick wall.
Thanks for the laugh.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)You need to admit that he has yuuuuge problems with the non-white vote
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)but because he went about it ALL wrong, still is.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)adding seats to our Assembly and Senate - unlike other so-called 'liberal' States - and we elected a moderate Democrat as our governor.
After the disrespect shown by Sanders supporters against our beloved Senator Boxer, you think a socialist-disguised-as-a-Democrat-so-he-could-be-president; a man who can't inspire the African-American or Latino vote; a man who allows his followers to heckle one of our most beloved Democrats, will win from the battle-tested Democrat, Hillary Clinton?? In what universe?
LonePirate
(13,431 posts)Of course, having a mostly cooperative legislature and a citizenry who prefers solving major problems instead of debating life's trivialities has also helped Brown. Still, he has a great record.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)when he wanted to veer off a bit to the dark side. He and Kamala Harris, the candidate running for Senator Boxer's seat now, have clashed a couple of times. She turned out to be more progressive than him.
However, Governor Brown listens to his legislature and is open to compromise. He doesn't march off angrily when he doesn't get his way. He listens, debates, and comes to a compromise that will help the State. That's what a president should do as well - be willing to work with the U.S. Congress (to a point) to get things done for the country, rather than staunchly stick to "his principles".
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)And other sorts of skullduggery.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)In in 20 states?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)"If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed."
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)It is in your best interest not to. That doesn't make it any less true. Just look at the exit polls.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I run a clean business.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Still...no sale. And all that smearing the Democratic Party nominee (according to MATH) isn't going to help you or your little revolution.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Also, you suck at math.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)I truly feel sorry for you, being so angry all the time.
And my math only sucks to those who don't understand it.
Here's the bottom line: BERNIE HAS LOST. BIG TIME. Does that give you the sadz?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)And I'm not the one using caps. You should chill out a bit, your blood pressure seems high. Maybe take a break and read a book, I suggest a math one. Start with the basics and work your way up.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)are used to SHOUT online, and that's exactly why I used them. They're not used to show anger. I'm sorry you fail to understand that. But that could explain why you don't understand MATH. You'd otherwise know that the faux-Dem LOST.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)You're all bluster and no bite.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)when the loud wailing of loss rises from the Sanders campaign when Democrats give Hillary Clinton my State.
I have no need for bluster. I'm a Hillary Clinton supporter and SHE HAS WON.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Your posts are kind of disturbing. Wailing and gnashing of teeth...you are coming from a dark place
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Severe anger management issues, Tourettes like yelling, speech repetition, talking to imaginary people, loss of logic and math faculties. I'm not a doctor, but I'm sure if you see a specialist they'll help you through these difficult times.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)livetohike
(22,165 posts)material. They came,they saw, they voted - for Hillary.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)follow politics and know how our gov't works. Only the idealists and clueless are so easily sold on his vision for a tyrannical utopia for the United States.
It's what I love about the African-American community: they see the snake oil for what it is.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)I'd rather vote for a winner who can actually get things done. I don't know about you, but I'm in no position to play "let's turn the U.S. into a giant experiment for socialism". I need my gov't to actually work for me. I can't afford to sit back and watch chaos happen with a lame-duck presidency for four years.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)She has peaked in performance, but never fear, she is seeking the gop donors now, in true democratic party fashion. Well, at least the Clinton brand of the democratic party (conservative wing) .
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)she has peaked. she was never going to garner anymore than she already had. Bernie tried to help her, but she chose the gop and their money over us. Let the fruit rot on the vine.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)and by not bringing up her emails. And by not pointing out her real record. He's been really soft on her moreso than us in here. But hey, she's been vetted what could anything Bernie has to say possibly harm her? or are you really just whining and want both sides of the issue, like her? Weak my friend, weak.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)nowhere did an article break down the voter registrations that show they're all Sanders followers. If you're talking about "independents" registering to vote for Sanders, then that's a weak position because they unregistered themselves immediately thereafter - which is what Republicans do after they try and muck up the Democratic Party nomination process, and which is why they didn't succeed at stealing NV for Sanders as they had hoped - hence the shouting at Senator Boxer last Saturday. Missed that, did you?
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I thought it was great and well deserved, Someone of her position talking down to people showed how sad the Hillary campaign has become. she didn't enjoy the medicine she earned. Tough cookies. As far as registrations and Bernie owning the youth vote, I noticed you chose to ignore that. So enjoy the bed you made. he tried to help but many Hillary supporters have said they do not even want our vote, and many of us are likely to oblige them. You are earning this loss , enjoy.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)down because she refuses to tow their line, and we Californians won't take kindly to that display of disrespect for one of the most liberal Senators, who stood with the CBC against G.W. Bush when they tried to ratify the (stolen) Ohio vote in 2004.
Heck, even poor but misguided Sanders-surrogate Nina Turner was 'booed' when she tried to gingerly ask that we unite. We can do without those bullies. Better they join the Tea Party where they'll be welcomed if they can't grow up and act like adults.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...bigger than the number who attend rallies.
Response to Txbluedog (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
djean111
(14,255 posts)And because it is wasted effort, doesn't work at DU, at all. Sorta like a fruit fly, little tiny buzzing around.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)You will know I started on this site because of the lemmings that I have to work with who are so broke supporting Sanders that they have no money to eat, so stressed out over his results that they are failing classes and yet are continuing to contribute to the Sanders campaign under the false hope that he is going to win and somehow magically erase their student debts and give them free college
djean111
(14,255 posts)You should get some help with that. Seriously.
And barking and sniping at DU does not make Hillary look any better, I promise you.
Oh, and my 21 YO grandson supports Bernie and is fully aware that some of Bernie's agenda means higher taxes, and thinks it would be totally worth it. Others of his friends are riled up about the TPP. Perhaps talking directly to your friends and telling them that you disagree with their own personal choices would be more useful to you.
Unless you really think your little posts here will put a halt to Bernie's campaign and support? bwhahahaha! You need to aim lower.
Maybe you could tell them where to go to get a job making some extra money.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's as simple as that. And when you factor in his refusal to do retail campaigning, you get an even clearer answer.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Are you saying you don't want those votes. I'm sure we could accommodate those wishes if they are truly your wishes.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Just like Hillary is 44 didn't derail Obama, angry Sanders supporters won't derail Clinton.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)so enjoy the bed you and her campaign have made. We tried to warn you. I'd say you better get busy selling the corporate queen to America, help is going to be a luxury.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)For instance, did you know that Bernie won Washington state by 40% (70.6 percent to 29.2 percent)? And did you also know that he got ZERO votes added for that?
There were a number of states like that. He won by Yuuuuuge margins, and got ZERO votes. I think it was because they were caucuses.
This clearly shows where the enthusiasm is.
.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)I gave the only example I could remember but there were other states where Bernie got a huge win and no votes were given. I think it was becasue they were caucus states and the people didn't vote. But I think they should do something besides giving him no votes.
In any case, those totals aren't the rock solid concrete people think they are. I mean, look at those crowds. Bernie has the mojo.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Don't feed it.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)It is amazing how many you have to ignore and still the nonsense gets through.
Response to pdsimdars (Reply #37)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)ttp://www.vox.com/2016/5/1/11549570/obama-correspondents-dinner-joke
global1
(25,285 posts)Though there have been other primaries run since the first time 3 million was mentioned - the 3 million number never seems to change. I'm wondering if this is just a bogus talking point or if it is a valid number.
I've never seen proof of this 3 million number here nor learn how this is computed. Can anyone provide where these three million votes have come from (states?)?
And isn't there a difference in the fact that caucuses have fewer participants - yet Bernie has won his fair share of caucuses?
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)This doesn't include caucuses. I added up the caucuses on another thread and Bernie gets about an extra 200k lead from those, so it's really more like 2.9 million probably.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)registration changed without their knowledge?
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)Do you need to change your tin fil hat every day or is it reusable
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)this one is the dumbest.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)The rally attendance is really nothing compared to the population of those areas.
30,000 people in Seattle = less than 1% of WA voters and only 18% of people who actually voted for him in the WA caucus.
30,000 in NYC = only 1% of registered Dems in New York City
30,000 in Sacramento = 6% of registered Dem in Sacramento county
You just have to put it in perspective. The big rallies make for good photo ops, but they don't mean much in big cities were millions of people live.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Unlike Republicans stage full! of contenders, Neither of our candidates are quitters.
kaleckim
(651 posts)make up a larger share of the public, he does much, much better than she does with independents, and that group has largely been excluded from your party's voting process by design. It also seems that her corruption, center-right record, hawkish foreign policy and the chance that she can be indicted by the FBI are not problems with many in her party. If that's the case, and if Sanders is already going against the most powerful (and corrupt) Democratic family, with massive amounts of money, name recognition and establishment support, it's amazing he's gotten this far. He is trying to appeal to people that clearly don't share his values. He has because of his message and because of how horrible of a candidate she is. The fact that so many Democrats don't see the obvious says a lot about them and what their party has become. The general public supports him far more than Clinton and is more supportive of the most progressive candidate in the race than the Democratic Party. The left doesn't have a home with either of the two parties, and hasn't since HRC and her husband rose to power.
Mike Nelson
(9,973 posts)...Bernie's rallies look like fun! ...maybe a Trump rally... might be fun for the spectacle. That doesn't necessarily mean they'll get my vote.
brush
(53,925 posts)Voting seems to be an after thought.
Those huge rallies, btw, cost big bucks, with the rental and security and clean-up and all.
That's where all the $27 donations go, besides Weaver's and Devine's retirement accounts.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)it doesn't mean that I would vote for him.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Response to Txbluedog (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)It is a libertarian type drive, the groups traveled from place to place cheering Ron Paul and then when the date came to vote in the primaries, the large crowds did not show up. He is not the first to have really large crowds and not get elected. His agenda does not attract enough of the people who voted.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)out and where he is now. Most of the states he lost to her were lost by a very small margin. Iowa for instance was lost by 1 10th of a percent. And in many of them there were voting problems favoring Hillary that have been challenged by the Bernie campaign. Many of the ones he did win are by good sized margins.
What we are beginning to see in the conventions is another form of voting problems again favoring Hillary and not very legal as in NV.
.99center
(1,237 posts)Are you going to admit to trolling us once again?
Your whole point of being here seems to be to disrupt and make fun of those silly liberals for participating in our Democracy, while seeing how many people supporting Hillary will post in agreement to your "Moderate" views.