2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy don't we project some imagiary Homophobia on Bernie
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by etherealtruth (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
...and prevent anyone from countering by posting it in the HC forum.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107141517
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)...stuff about Bernie that we're not allowed to respond to because we've all been blocked from the group. That's what I mean by "That's how they operate." See? Wasn't it nice that we were able to have this exchange rather than my just having said it without you being able to respond?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)In addition to the stakes, it says a lot about the players.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)at the other kids.
They need to get off the playground and grow-up.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)If Sanders supporters complained about other things the way they complain about election results
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/05/18/if-sanders-supporters-complained-about-other-things-the-way-they-complain-about-election-results/
By Alexandra Petri May 18
With apologies to my Facebook feed.
CHESS:
This game is rigged. The pawns get to move almost NOWHERE, whereas the QUEEN (DETECT ANY RESEMBLANCE HERE???) can just move wherever she likes with no apparent rhyme or reason. Shes not a bishop or a rook. Why does she move like one? Also, the black pieces have to move second, which is TOTALLY unfair and needs to be looked into, unless I am playing with the white pieces today.
SCRABBLE:
I played exactly the same word as my opponent, using exactly the same letters, and received fewer points for it just because I wasnt on some pink square, which my opponent claimed gave you DOUBLE the points. Pretty sure thats the definition of rigged. Why would you just randomly have squares all over the board that counted for MORE or FEWER points when its just the same words? Also my opponent had two BLANK tiles, which just got to be WHATEVER letters she wanted. This seems made-up. Milton Bradley are shills who are trying to prevent the revolution. Also, BERN is totally a word.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)ETA: Oh, I get you now. Pink also means "communist," in addition to being "the girls' color."
Thanks! Got it now.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)when he refused to speak to AIPAC
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)There's totally a pink square.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)You've been blocked any way - am I right? They don't want us over there and they didnt invite us to their party. And we can't even alert on their posts no matter how scandalous. So don't read it! They show who they are for all to see (unless of course you have them on ignore - which I am not advocating just saying it is an option...they block you you have the right to ignore them)!
Let them have there fun. We will all still be here in 2017.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)I'm just not that kind of person.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)imaginary homophobia in that post.
Henhouse
(646 posts)You seriously aren't trying to argue that the Scrabble rules in re: to pink squares counting as double words is an attack on Sanders?
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..and I'm sure others feel the same way. Perhaps, some have no feelings and didn't react.
DURHAM D
(32,617 posts)Note: I am a member of the LGBT community.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Your accusation and your posts in this thread don't make any sense? Explain the imaginary homophobia supposedly being projected here?
Arkansas Granny
(31,538 posts)The pink squares are designated as double word squares. There is nothing homophobic about that reference and there is nothing homophobic about the responses.
Your remarks are ridiculous.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,538 posts)What do you think she's "on about"?
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)read what he accuses of being homophobia. If one were to read it, they'd realize there is no homophobia.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Correlates to the LGBQT community?
Your attempt to use this in this manner is a statement. Not the statement you are thinking. Transparent in how you just opened up your own thoughts to us while trying to paint others as homophobic.
From that section of the link.
"I played exactly the same word as my opponent, using exactly the same letters, and received fewer points for it just because I wasnt on some pink square, which my opponent claimed gave you DOUBLE the points. Pretty sure thats the definition of rigged. Why would you just randomly have squares all over the board that counted for MORE or FEWER points when its just the same words? Also my opponent had two BLANK tiles, which just got to be WHATEVER letters she wanted. This seems made-up. Milton Bradley are shills who are trying to prevent the revolution. Also, BERN is totally a word."
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On Sun May 22, 2016, 08:10 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Why don't we project some imagiary Homophobia on Bernie
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512027139
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Off the chain false accusation. Please hide this wildly OTT projection of imaginary homophobia, thank you.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 22, 2016, 08:15 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Many imaginary things have been posted about Hillary Clinton, much of it brought here from right wing conspiracy sites. Let it stand.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's an opinion. Counter it if you don't like it.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Attacks a whole group of DU'rs, Over the line.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Both sides need to stop this nonsense.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Statement of Purpose GDP:
A forum for general discussion of the Democratic presidential primaries. Disruptive meta-discussion is forbidden.